Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton to Obama: Don't blink on debt ceiling showdown
CNN ^ | July 3, 2011 | Pamela Sellers

Posted on 07/03/2011 3:34:17 AM PDT by bobk333

"This is the political equivalent of the government shutdown when I was president," Clinton said. "The White House could blink. I hope not."

Clinton made his argument in front of a large crowd at the left-leaning Aspen Ideas Festival in Colorado Saturday. Should the United States default on its payments, the country's credit ratings will decline, Clinton said, and interest rates could rise.

Growing anti-government forces like the Tea Party are truly affecting healthy government reform, Clinton said. "It's astonishingly good politics," he admitted, "but poor economic policy."

(Excerpt) Read more at edition.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintondebtceiling; debtceiling; debtlimit; government; governmentshutdown; obama; shutdown; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: bobk333

So far, polls show that a majority is with the GOP on this issue. They don’t want the debt ceiling raised. They want government cut and they want steps taken to pay down the debt.

But the parade of sob stories hasn’t begun yet and the tide of public opinion can change.

I hope and trust that the GOP has a counter strategy when the sob stories appear. I think they do.

The best counter is to point to the debt we’re saddling our children and grandchildren with, but in this “me first and only” generation of the FSA, that appeal may fall on deaf ears.


21 posted on 07/03/2011 5:41:10 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobk333

There is only one party in DC now and they BOTH stand for the same immoral and unethical corruption... and the saddest part is this is not a statement made out of anger at republican inaction... it is the truth.

LLS


22 posted on 07/03/2011 5:46:04 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ("GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH"! I choose LIBERTY and PALIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DooDahhhh

RAPIST and pervert.

LLS


23 posted on 07/03/2011 5:47:01 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ("GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH"! I choose LIBERTY and PALIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bobk333

The situation is different this time and Clinton knows it is different this time. Obama has a political tin ear, whereas Clinton, for all his Clintonesq crap, has a way of not only sensing the tune, but then turning around and calling it. This time he is calling it for Obama. This time, if the Government ‘shuts down’ Obama will take the fall.


24 posted on 07/03/2011 5:48:10 AM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We deserve the government we allow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eCSMaster
The republican leadership will do nothing... they will not act... they will not confront... they will not defend. As trent lott said when challenged as to why he was not defending republican positions and countering democrat propaganda... and why as defacto leader he was not defending the party... he said... “THAT IS NOT MY JOB”. Well... that is exactly why we will see no defense or offense... that and the fact that the current leadership supports obama and his agenda behind the scenes. All that you and I will get is rhetoric with nothing backing it up... fiat words.

LLS

25 posted on 07/03/2011 5:53:33 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ("GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH"! I choose LIBERTY and PALIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

Who will loan money when the government has legislated that many of those loans do not have to be repaid?

LLS


26 posted on 07/03/2011 5:54:58 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ("GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH"! I choose LIBERTY and PALIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Impeachment starts in the House and the Senate holds a trial... The House indicts... the Senate tries.

LLS


27 posted on 07/03/2011 5:56:05 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ("GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH"! I choose LIBERTY and PALIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bobk333
I hope Boehner and the Republicans don't blink.

What did the Easter Bunny bring you this year?

28 posted on 07/03/2011 5:56:27 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4. If that is granted, all else follows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reefdiver
TRENT LOTT would not remove clinton from office... and that is what stopped his expulsion... and they had the dirt on old trent... and they still do. He is guilty of many things... look up his Brother-in-Law dickie scruggs... trent and dickie arejustthisclose.

LLS

29 posted on 07/03/2011 5:58:26 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ("GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH"! I choose LIBERTY and PALIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: reefdiver
The Senate rinos would not remove the scum bag from office

There were 55 Republicans in the US Senate, and 45 Democrats. Removal from office would have required 67 "guilty" votes.

The fact that five Republicans voted against conviction on all 3 charges was of no importance in the grand scheme of things.

Removal from office would have required between 12 and 17 Democrats, and that was never a possibility.

I would say that the Clinton impeachment was probably (politically) a mistake.

30 posted on 07/03/2011 6:03:41 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4. If that is granted, all else follows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
TRENT LOTT would not remove clinton from office... and that is what stopped his expulsion

How did Trent Lott prevent the necessary 12-17 Democrats from voting to convict?

Clinton was NEVER, NEVER, NEVER going to be removed from office by a 55-45 Senate, with or without RINOs and with or without Trent Lott.

31 posted on 07/03/2011 6:07:46 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4. If that is granted, all else follows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Got it !


32 posted on 07/03/2011 6:12:25 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Eh ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Who will loan money when the government has legislated that many of those loans do not have to be repaid?


Not sure it will happen exactly that way as lending would stop altogether. What is more likely is hyperinflation was the Government prints more $$ to “create” prosperity. The effect will be almost the same—existing debt will lose much of its original value.


33 posted on 07/03/2011 6:22:04 AM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Who will loan money when the government has legislated that many of those loans do not have to be repaid?


Not sure it will happen exactly that way as lending would stop altogether. What is more likely is hyperinflation was the Government prints more $$ to “create” prosperity. The effect will be almost the same—existing debt will lose much of its original value.


34 posted on 07/03/2011 6:22:04 AM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bobk333
America's Ruling Class -- And the Perils of Revolution

Differences between Bushes, Clintons, and Obamas are of degree, not kind.

35 posted on 07/03/2011 6:25:18 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
I would say that the Clinton impeachment was probably (politically) a mistake.

Agreed. Waste of time and political capital.

36 posted on 07/03/2011 6:26:10 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator (And, therefore, isn't Jim (Robinson) the original Blog Father? - FReeper Aevery_Freeman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bobk333

Daddy Blues


37 posted on 07/03/2011 6:57:39 AM PDT by FrankR (A people that values its privileges above its principles will soon lose both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
trent lott told Henry Hyde not to “bring that trash into MY Senate Chamber"... I remember Henry and his aide walking across that grass knoll that led to the Senate... trent would not meet with them. You may be 100% correct in your assumption that they votes were not there... as we all know rats will group together to protect one another... a trait completely missing in the spineless gop... but to say that trent lott did not block the actions that would have led to a vote are wrong. Our two points are not mutually exclusive.

LLS

38 posted on 07/03/2011 7:02:01 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ("GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH"! I choose LIBERTY and PALIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

I knew that you knew that! :-)

LLS


39 posted on 07/03/2011 7:06:26 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ("GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH"! I choose LIBERTY and PALIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

True... good points.

LLS


40 posted on 07/03/2011 7:07:59 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ("GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH"! I choose LIBERTY and PALIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson