Posted on 07/03/2011 7:57:06 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
“Lively” like, It isn’t lively enough now?
And The Clintoon “did not have sex with......that woman....” either. Fact: Paul Revere warned the British. What does intention have to do with it? Nothing. Nothing at all.
No doubt!
As a ‘Potential’ Presidential Candidate, Life Is Good
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2743202/posts
Highly recommend reading posts 22 and 27 by Polybius, links direct to these posts;
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2743202/posts?page=22#22
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2743202/posts?page=27#27
She was not ask a question, the reporter ask her how were things going. Sort of one of those nice day statements, a good answer would have been wonderful. And her statement was not an answer, it was gibberish.
Actually, that would be a good thing.
Then, if we could Cain and Bachman to flip a coin and decide who gets to run, we’d be down to ONE conservatives candidate. Everybody endorses this one candidate, the conservative base gets behind them, and suddenly Romney, Huntsman, Gingrich and all the other RINOs are completely irrelevant.
Then its Obama’s turn.
Gov Palin and Gov Perry are both smart enough to not push the Right into the arms of a third party candidate. If they both run in the GOP primary, one of them would bow to the stronger candidate and then campaign for them. They are not destructive. They know a 3rd party choice would give Obama another 4 years to finish off this country.
got a link to the video or audio of where the reporter asked her that question?
"What have you seen so far today and what are you going to take away from your vistit?"
That is it verbatim and in its entirety.
It wasn't even about Paul Revere and it certainly was not a "gotcha" question.
Yes, Palin fumbled some wording about Paul Revere in an impromptu moment but she was basically correct. It caused me to research the history of the ride and to learn something. Any article that describes what she said in the way this one does is intellectually dishonest and not worth reading in my opinion.
Nobody is more aware of that fact than me. It alarms me that so many here believe that the general public is absolutely sold on a strong Conservative candidate. Especially, this dream that the most conservative candidate will win in a landslide, when most of the polls show that the country is still very much evenly divided.
With fraud, immigration, Welfare recipient class, etc, we are looking at another near 50/50 election again. It will be close, in spite of all the projection and claims of the opposite.
Thank God Sarah will win both elections and be our nexr President.It becomes obvious with each passing event.
Yes, it was more of having a nice time statement.
I don’t think Palin is running.
Perry/Bolton
Clairity’s links in Post #44 are certainly something to toss in the political pot of punditry.
“Romney would then walk all over the general primaries like McCain did.”
This is our greatest danger — the conservative vote being split among many candidates, and Romney becomes the nominee, just to lose spectecularly to Obama.
Not Bolton. I love the guy but, no way.
If you ask a kid in school about. Paul and what he did, an improper answer would be he rode out to warn the British. I do not care what planet you are from, that is the fact.
I am not hard over on Bolton -— I am thinking of him as a good VP for Perry, the same way Cheney was for Bush. While Bolton is not quite Cheney, but he would bring foreign policy experience, while Perry could run on the economy.
But I’ll be happy with whomever Perry picks as VP. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.