Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rare Earth Metals Abundant in Deep-Sea Mud (Major Economic, Geopolitical Implications )
CBC ^ | July 4, 2011 | Staff

Posted on 07/04/2011 12:32:57 PM PDT by lbryce


A map published with the study shows rare earth element deposits in the Pacific Ocean less than two metres deep.

Abundant, rich deposits of materials used to make modern electronics have been found in the deep sea, suggesting that China could lose its tight control over the global supply.

China currently controls 97 per cent of the world's production of rare earth elements and the metal yttrium, which are used in energy-efficient batteries and power sources for devices such as flat-screen televisions, electric cars and smartphones. As demand for the elements grows, China has been hiking taxes and putting restrictions on exports. Prices of rare earth elements have increased roughly 700 per cent over the past decade.

It turns out that those elements are so abundant on the bottom of the ocean that the mud covering just one square kilometre of ocean floor in the Pacific Ocean could supply one-fifth of the current annual world consumption, according to a new study published online Sunday in Nature Geoscience.

Researchers led by Yasuhiro Kato at the University of Tokyo's department of systems innovation also found that extracting the elements from the mud was easy — almost all of them came out after being mixed with solutions of hydrochloric or sulphuric acid that are considered dilute (roughly five times the concentration of acid in your stomach). Much of it is found in the accessible surface layer of mud.

Scientists had previously known that rare earth elements and yttrium are found in some kinds of deep-sea mud, but they knew little about the distribution of those deposits.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbc.ca ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; rareearthmetals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Comment #1 Removed by Moderator

To: lbryce
extracting the elements from the mud was easy — almost all of them came out after being mixed with solutions of hydrochloric or sulphuric acid that are considered dilute (roughly five times the concentration of acid in your stomach). Much of it is found in the accessible surface layer of mud.
Can the elements be extracted from the mud in situ?

2 posted on 07/04/2011 12:48:18 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

If this pans out...is very good news. The Chinese dont like to play nice in the market place.


3 posted on 07/04/2011 12:49:11 PM PDT by blasater1960 (Deut 30, Psalm 111...the Torah and the Law, is attainable past, present and forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Time to get the Glomar Explorer out of storage.


4 posted on 07/04/2011 12:49:15 PM PDT by Ed Condon (Give 'em a heading, an altitude, and a reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I guess BO will ban this now.


5 posted on 07/04/2011 12:50:58 PM PDT by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
the regulatory bureaucratic labyrinth

Anyone who can't figure out that almost all of those areas are in "international" waters, outside of the reach of the Obamunist bureaucrats, doesn't deserve to make a dime.

6 posted on 07/04/2011 12:51:07 PM PDT by FreeKeys (THE basic, fatal system flaw destroying our liberty: allowing morons, moochers, & looters to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

1) Afghanistan also is rich with the elements, but they lack the infrastructure for extraction.
2) Focus on international waters so Obama and the environazi’s can’t stop you.


7 posted on 07/04/2011 12:51:16 PM PDT by G Larry (I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his character)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

China will need some more aircraft carriers.


8 posted on 07/04/2011 12:51:28 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Excerpted articles should not be continued in the body of the thread. Thank you.


9 posted on 07/04/2011 12:58:10 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blasater1960
If this pans out...

Good one!

10 posted on 07/04/2011 12:59:14 PM PDT by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

But won’t the acid harm the __________ (fill in the blank)if so then we can’t even consider extracting it.

I’m sure the Left are going through their lists of undersea creatures to see which one fits best for this application.


11 posted on 07/04/2011 1:07:02 PM PDT by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jonno

Oh no! All my rare earth stocks will be toast tomorrow! This could be a ploy by the short sellers. Yes I have been hearing about Nautilus Minerals for years. I don’t think they will be dredging up the ocean just yet.


12 posted on 07/04/2011 1:14:50 PM PDT by Sicvee (Sicvee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: King Moonracer
I guess BO will ban this now.

For the children.

13 posted on 07/04/2011 1:15:50 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." - Bertrand de Jouvenel des Ursins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: redangus
“I’m sure the Left are going through their lists of undersea creatures to see which one fits best for this application.”

I predict they have already designated a species.

It will be a bottom feeding organism known to science as: Retrogradosus marinus biolgus. These abysmally parasitic organism feed only in the mud in the bottom of troughs cut into the floor of the abyssal plain where their disgusting and destructive behavior can be concealed by a mile or more of sea water.

14 posted on 07/04/2011 1:21:59 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles, Kill the EPA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Can the minerals be recovered on site? From what the erudite writer wrote, there should be absolutely no problems.

Why?

Read this howler: “A map published with the study shows rare earth element deposits in the Pacific Ocean less than two metres deep.”

How much trouble can there be recovering anything that is only two meters underwater?


15 posted on 07/04/2011 2:07:28 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles, Kill the EPA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blasater1960

I’m very sceptical about these reports!!! It sounds like the world is trying to put pressure on China by cliaming that rare earths can be easily mined from the ocean bottom and that the Chinese should make nice with their supply. If I was the Chinese I would play this like a Missourian...that is, “Show me” that you can recover them.


16 posted on 07/04/2011 2:26:21 PM PDT by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru
How much trouble can there be recovering anything that is only two meters underwater?
I was simply speculating on the possibility of avoiding the materials handling problem of getting the ore to the surface. If you could extract the valuable minerals in situ, you would disturb the sea bed that much less.

17 posted on 07/04/2011 2:40:43 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru
A map published with the study shows rare earth element deposits in the Pacific Ocean less than two metres deep.

"How much trouble can there be recovering anything that is only two meters underwater?"

That was the first thing to grab my attention, as well.

How the heck have all those supertankers (much less submarines) been tooling around in that ocean all these years?

Dumb@$$ reporter...

18 posted on 07/04/2011 3:12:37 PM PDT by TXnMA (There is no Constitutional right to NOT be offended.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jonno

Check out, Nautilus Minerals Inc.

http://www.nautilusminerals.com/s/Home.asp


19 posted on 07/04/2011 3:17:48 PM PDT by preacher (A government which robs from Peter to pay Paul will always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ed Condon

Chuckle, not many will know what you refer to!


20 posted on 07/04/2011 3:36:47 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson