Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Graham: Gadhafi, like Hitler, is serious about attacking Europe (BARF ALERT)
The Hill, Washington DC ^ | 2011-07-06

Posted on 07/05/2011 4:58:39 PM PDT by rabscuttle385

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) warned on Tuesday that Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi is "serious" about attacking European cities in order to pressure European officials to cease their airstrikes against Libya.

"He actually means it," Graham said of Gadhafi. "Hitler meant it. He means it."

Graham spoke in a colloquy with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and used borderline apocalyptic tones about the need to remove Gadhafi from power.

"I know we're a war-weary nation, but there is no upside to Gadhafi staying in power," he said. "That is a national security nightmare for this country."

Graham added that while the top priority of the U.S. is to balance its budget, he warned that economic prosperity depends on removing dictators like Gadhafi.

"There will never will be economic prosperity in America if the world is in the hands of evil people who will make it very difficult for us to travel and trade and do business," he said.

He also said the U.S. needs to warm up to its role as the leader of the free world.

"I believe that we're destined to lead the free world," he said. "I don't consider it a burden. I consider it the birthright of all Americans — not only to maintain our freedom, but to help others secure theirs.

"The day that America rejects that leadership role is the day we will eventually lose our freedom," he added.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: 112th; gadhafi; graham; hitler; libya; lindseygraham; mccain; mccaintruthfile; mclameslapdog; rino; southcarolina; warmonger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-52 next last

1 posted on 07/05/2011 4:58:46 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: rabscuttle385

Wasn’t Lightloafered Linsy spooning with Muamar Q just a year or two ago, welcoming him back to the family of man?


3 posted on 07/05/2011 5:02:35 PM PDT by Travis McGee (Castigo Cay is in print and on Kindle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck; bamahead; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; indylindy; Kimberly GG; Impy; ...
"I believe that we're destined to lead the free world," he said. "I don't consider it a burden. I consider it the birthright of all Americans — not only to maintain our freedom, but to help others secure theirs."

I believe that you're an idiot, Lindsey.

Just like one Woodrow Wilson.

"The world must be made safe for democracy."

Psst...he was a Democrat too, just like you.

4 posted on 07/05/2011 5:02:42 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

IMHO, Mr. Khaddafy is perfectly justified in striking back at nations who attacked his country without provocation. He’s not going to invade anyone and he’s certainly not going to undertake a conquest of Europe or a genocide so the ‘Hitler’ comment is utterly ignorant.


5 posted on 07/05/2011 5:03:44 PM PDT by MeganC (NO WAR FOR OIL! ........except when a Democrat's in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Yeah, Daffy is gonna storm the beaches of Italy any minute now.

Whatta clown


6 posted on 07/05/2011 5:03:44 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Wasn’t Lightloafered Linsy spooning with Muamar Q just a year or two ago, welcoming him back to the family of man?

Yes, in 2009, shortly after Lindsey and Juan threw the election for Obama.


7 posted on 07/05/2011 5:05:14 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

Its a desperate comment from Graham. He needs support for that war few of us support and he’s willing to pull Hitler out to do it.


8 posted on 07/05/2011 5:05:26 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Of course Gaddafi means it!!! With the full backing from America Haters, POTUS Barack Hussein Obama, Jeremiah Wright , Van Jones, Louie Farrakhan, Michelle Obama, Bill Ayres, George Soros, Valerie Jarrett, etc., Gaddafi is cruising along, unmolested, months and months while secretly protected by two faced and double speak POTUS Obama and his Democrat minions!!


9 posted on 07/05/2011 5:07:00 PM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
You people of South Caroline should be ashamed of yourselves for sending nut case gramnesty to dc,
10 posted on 07/05/2011 5:07:38 PM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

South Carolina getting their money’s worth from the southern idiot. =.=


11 posted on 07/05/2011 5:08:44 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

I know that Kevin DuJan (from HillBuzz) is persona non grata around here, but he made a good point (from someone who knows): when we elect “republican” homosexuals to Congress, we leave ourselves open to the fact that they are going to be black-mailed (or “african-american-mailed) to do what lefties want them to do when they need it to be done.

We should have kicked out Larry Craig, Grahm and the page boy pervert (whose name escapes me at the moment) before they could be black-mailed/outed when it suited the left’s purpose.

Openly homosexual republicans are (in the absence of anthing better) better than a repub who is a closet turd burgler who can be coerced to do the left’s bidding at any time.


12 posted on 07/05/2011 5:09:18 PM PDT by PhilosopherStone1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Yeah right. Gaddafi knows if he openly attacked Europe, then he’d be inviting them to colonize Libya again as they take their pound of flesh (and oil) from him. If he continues what he’s doing now and has his son Saif bleating about how NATO is acting illegally and their all racist neo-colonialists, then mission fatigue will eventually cause NATO to splinter.


13 posted on 07/05/2011 5:14:32 PM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
How did this guy ever get elected in South Carolina? California I could buy, but South Carolina?

"I know we're a war-weary nation, but there is no upside to Gadhafi staying in power," he said. "That is a national security nightmare for this country."

The upside is that the Al-Queda puppets won't be in charge. That would be a National Security "nightmare" ... if someone in the Senate actually gave two bits for our National Security (as evidenced by their 'zeal' to protect our National borders...).

And "war-weary" ... Yeah, killing people and having our troops in harm's way is something we should always save as a last resort... No one has adequately explained the purpose of this "war" (except that we shouldn't be "weary" of it). Sure, Khadaffi is a psycho. But he has seemed to have been effectively neutered since Bush the Younger laid the hammer on Sadam. If we want to go after psychos - it seems like that are others far ahead of the Libyan fashion maven.... Starting with Ill Kim in North Korea.
It'll be hard to convince me that this Libyan adventure is nothing more than an exercise to transfer oil rights to people whom the French and British government felt it would be easier to work with than Khadaffi (...yes, this one really is 'blood for oil')...

Graham added that while the top priority of the U.S. is to balance its budget, he warned that economic prosperity depends on removing dictators like Gadhafi.

uh-huh... Whatever you say, Lindsey...

"There will never will be economic prosperity in America if the world is in the hands of evil people who will make it very difficult for us to travel and trade and do business," he said.

Sounds like he's making a good case to cluster-bomb the TSA (aka, 'evil people who make it very difficult for us to travel...').
I'm behind you on this one Lindsey...

He also said the U.S. needs to warm up to its role as the leader of the free world. "I believe that we're destined to lead the free world," he said. "I don't consider it a burden. I consider it the birthright of all Americans — not only to maintain our freedom, but to help others secure theirs. "The day that America rejects that leadership role is the day we will eventually lose our freedom," he added.

He sure had the cliche-o-meter running full speed on that one...Kick out Ghadaffi and replace him with Al-Queda stooges -- Great Leadership to save our freedom...Thanks Senator... I preferred your TSA idea. Let loose the dogs of war....

14 posted on 07/05/2011 5:17:07 PM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

3 years of Obama and not one televised “peace” protest to end the wars.


15 posted on 07/05/2011 5:25:10 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask Barack Obama this election if he believes Jesus Christ rose from the dead and walked among men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

I can’t believe the audacity of Ghaddafi threatening retaliation against a nation that’s attacked him!

The nerve!


16 posted on 07/05/2011 5:29:26 PM PDT by Tempest (Ruining the day of corporate butt kissers everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Senator Graham and Secretary of State Rodham-Clinton, like Reichsmarschall Hermann Wilhelm Göring, are serious about unprovoked aerial bombardment and aggression against a nation and people who were minding their own business.

The Nazi aggressor analog in this utterly arbitrary adventure is not Qaddafi.


17 posted on 07/05/2011 5:30:16 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (We are not governed. We are occupied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Hey, I’m all for smacking the crap out of Q’Daffy and turning him into a cloud of vapor for all the terrorist garbage he sponsored over the years, but who are we going to replace him with?

That’s right, questionable and uncertain opposition who may have far more radical ties and intentions, and backed by people who want to revive the Caliphate. So although the use of military force is certainly justifiable, but is it the wisest course of action?

In my opinion, hell no.


18 posted on 07/05/2011 5:34:06 PM PDT by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tempest

WHY did Fuhrer Obama attack Libya?

Same reason the Fuhrer sent $Billions to Egypt.

In Egypt it’s the RADICAL Muslim Brotherhood who want to destroy Israel, the same as every true Muslim.

In Libya, Obama supports the rebels to overthrow the government to put Al Qaeda in power.

It’s right in front of you but Americans will not believe that EVERYTHING Obama does is exactly what a radical Muslim plant in the White House would do.

If Obama smells like a Muslim, hurts America like only a Muslim would then any reasonable person would consider the fact Obama is probably a radical Muslim set up by others. The truth is Americans will not even consider the obvious until SEE BS News tells America that they’ve been conned.


19 posted on 07/05/2011 5:40:48 PM PDT by politicianslie (Democrats are COMMUNISTS, Repubs are SOCIALISTS, and Barry is a Muslim manipulating USEFUL IDIOTS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

“...mission fatigue will eventually cause NATO to splinter.”

It is past time for NATO, an obsolete organization which has served and completed it’s purpose, to be dissolved, not merely splintered. This is the SECOND Clinton inspired use of NATO as bombs on call to serve the interests of Moslem provocateurs and European globalists. NATO has become what it was set up to resist - a military embodiment of political aggression and brute force.


20 posted on 07/05/2011 5:42:06 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (We are not governed. We are occupied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

This is truly an analogy of vast historical ignorance. Qaddhafi, dungheap that he is, is unlike Hitler (and the danger posed by him) as: 1) his country is not sited in the middle of Europe; 2) he has a fraction of the 100 million ruled by Hitler; 3) he has no industrial base outside of oil; 4) his territorial ambitions have been limited to idiot border skirmishes with his neighbors; 5) his armed forces are weak, undermanned and with poorly maintained equipment; 6) he has no scientific or inventive base or experts; 7) he hasn’t singled out a particular group for his venom. At least Graham didn’t say something even more surpassingly stupid such as “if we don’t fight them there, they will be in San Francisco”.


21 posted on 07/05/2011 5:45:54 PM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alarm rider; Alex1977; at bay; Babsig; BILL_C; bnelson44; ColdOne; DesScorp; G.Love; gruntSGT; ...
Linda, yer an idiot!!

2014 is gonna be a bad year for you.

Uber RINO Lindsey Ping
"Republican by day, Democrat by night."


Want on or off this ping list?
Just FReepmail me.


22 posted on 07/05/2011 5:46:38 PM PDT by upchuck (Think you know hardship? Ha! Wait till the dollar is no longer the world's reserve currency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

“Hey, I’m all for smacking the crap out of Q’Daffy and turning him into a cloud of vapor for all the terrorist garbage he sponsored over the years, but who are we going to replace him with?”

I understand your sentiment, and normally would agree, but we actually traded that right for something else. One of the real accomplishments of the Bush efforts in recent years was to turn Qaddafi to one of OUR assets during the decade long “War on Terror”. He has been playing ball with us, and in his bizarre way, doing so in good faith.

If you turn someone, then later turn on and kill them, you will NOT get such cooperation from others down the line. I think this is yet another reason Obama/Clinton want to kill him. It will cut off our ability to turn others in the future, when we are demonstrably treacherous ourselves.


23 posted on 07/05/2011 5:48:39 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (We are not governed. We are occupied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Oh, Lindsey.

Gadafi may be serious about blowing up a few bombs, but to compare that to Hitler’s nassive invasions meant to permanently add German territory is your typical silliness.


24 posted on 07/05/2011 5:50:09 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Graham can’t see the difference between siding with France and Europe against Hitler, and siding with members of Al Qaeda against Khadaffy.

And I thought I was a basher of the French. I’m a piker compared to Graham.

Hey France, Graham thinks you’re the equivalent of Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Frankly, I don’t.


25 posted on 07/05/2011 5:52:51 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Muslim Brotherhood (renames itself) the Liberty and Justice Party. NOT A JOKE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

I wonder what Kaddafi did to Obama to start all this... must have accused him of being a capitalist or something.


26 posted on 07/05/2011 6:01:31 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

To steal a quote, what’s he gonna invade with ... “harsh language”? Go away Lindsey.


27 posted on 07/05/2011 6:03:42 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; All

Has anyone ever seen Lindsey and Biden in the same place at one time or were they separated at birth?


28 posted on 07/05/2011 6:07:52 PM PDT by TwoSwords (The Lord is a man of war, Exodus 15:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
"I know we're a war-weary nation, but there is no upside to Gadhafi staying in power,"

Except it's entirely possible that his successor would be worse, idiot.

29 posted on 07/05/2011 6:12:14 PM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

How many wars are enough? How many times do we have to fight Europe’s wars?


30 posted on 07/05/2011 6:21:11 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Democrats = authoritarian socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

How many wars are enough? How many times do we have to fight Europe’s wars?


31 posted on 07/05/2011 6:21:26 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Democrats = authoritarian socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) warned on Tuesday that Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi is "serious" about attacking European cities in order to pressure European officials to cease their airstrikes against Libya.

I would suggest that Iran will be the real problem. They are more or less the preeminent power in the region (with the exception of Turkey). An openly jihadist Pakistani regime is also a grave threat.

"He actually means it," Graham said of Gadhafi. "Hitler meant it. He means it."

Hitler wrote a book about his plans. In all fairness, so have the Muslims. It's called 'The Koran'.

"I know we're a war-weary nation, but there is no upside to Gadhafi staying in power," he said. "That is a national security nightmare for this country."

Graham added that while the top priority of the U.S. is to balance its budget, he warned that economic prosperity depends on removing dictators like Gadhafi.

Economic prosperity depends on our independence from unstable countries in the Middle East. C'mon. We created The Manhattan project and put the first man on the moon.

"There will never will be economic prosperity in America if the world is in the hands of evil people who will make it very difficult for us to travel and trade and do business," he said.

America in the hands of so called moderates is just as bad. Or worse, with the disguised intention.

"I believe that we're destined to lead the free world," he said. "I don't consider it a burden. I consider it the birthright of all Americans — not only to maintain our freedom, but to help others secure theirs.

Other nations must be willing to put their lives on the line. There is an allusion in the Bible that (paraphrasing) states if a slave is offered freedom, and rejects it, then bind him forever.

Many people read the Bible and think it justifies inequity, not realizing that it is also a commentary of the times. Reporting if you would.

32 posted on 07/05/2011 6:40:02 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse ((unite))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Then let Europe deal with him. Until Congress approves this action we have no business being involved and the Generals carrying out Obama’s orders in this war should be tried for violating the law.


33 posted on 07/05/2011 6:46:24 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

“Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) warned on Tuesday that Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi is “serious” about attacking European cities in order to pressure European officials to cease their airstrikes against Libya.”
Good! Let europe save their own sorry butts, for once. Hows about we mind our own business for once, grahamnesty you frigging RINO.


34 posted on 07/05/2011 6:48:53 PM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: MeganC; rabscuttle385; DoughtyOne; sickoflibs; cripplecreek
IMHO, Mr. Khaddafy is perfectly justified in striking back at nations who attacked his country without provocation.

I wouldn't go that far.

However, silly comments by Graham. Gaddaffi attacking Europe would the same thing as putting a gun is his mouth. Gaddaffi is not that insane or stupid.

36 posted on 07/05/2011 7:17:06 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Why is everyone “Hitler?” That guy had a huge industrial complex and some of the best general staff and engineers in the world. He was a nut, but he had the tools to do what he threatened.

Kaddafi ain’t Hitler. Not even close. Not even AA Hitler. More like Single A, drive to the games in a pickup truck hitler.


37 posted on 07/05/2011 7:17:06 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (Is there anyone that Obama won't toss under the bus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

“He actually means it,” Graham said of Gadhafi. “Hitler meant it. He means it.”

Go Away Queer!


38 posted on 07/05/2011 7:19:12 PM PDT by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date that will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Senator Grahm you’re like a gay Hitler.


39 posted on 07/05/2011 7:34:22 PM PDT by Blado (Audemus jura nostra defendere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy; MeganC; rabscuttle385; DoughtyOne; sickoflibs; cripplecreek

MeganC, I don’t agree with going in to combat Khadaffy because we are doing it on behalf of Al Qaeda and the Muslem Brotherhood. What happens if we are successful?

Morally, if we were representing a righteous group, we would be justified in taking action in Libya. I know some will debate me on that point. This debate is mute, because we can’t represent a righteous group, because there isn’t one.

Is Khadaffy justified in standing up against the entities attacking him from outside his nation? Well, the entities that advocated the attacks on Khadaffi the most, don’t advocate for us taking action in other nations at all.

Now that a United States of Iran is a possibility, they’re just happy as clams in mud to advocate it.

No sale.

Those that state what other nations do is their own business, shouldn’t be able to game this issue just because it’s Khadaffy and the Muslim Brotherhood will benefit.

If you don’t advocate for U.S. intervention, then shut the hell up Lefties.

Europe and the United States should not be taking action in Libya. Khadaffy should not be fighting against them. He doesn’t have moral grounds to do so. His own people want him out. I think the replacement will be worse in the long run.

Of course going by the common Leftist ideology, Khadaffy has as much right to rule as any U.S. president. Morality is very subjective. His moral values are as valid as ours.

Gag me.


40 posted on 07/05/2011 7:34:41 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Muslim Brotherhood (renames itself) the Liberty and Justice Party. NOT A JOKE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Lindy Graham is a bona-fide, certified moron. I can’t believe people like him can get out of the bed in the morning, forget being a legislator...


41 posted on 07/05/2011 7:49:06 PM PDT by farlander (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Gaddafi is serious about living out his last few years on earth in the relative opulence that the job of being dictator of Libya can provide.


42 posted on 07/05/2011 8:01:43 PM PDT by eclecticEel (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness: 7/4/1776 - 3/21/2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

“You people of South Caroline should be ashamed of yourselves for sending nut case gramnesty to dc,”
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

For once you are actually right.


43 posted on 07/05/2011 8:12:31 PM PDT by RipSawyer (Trying to reason with a liberal is like teaching algebra to a tomcat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; All

GRRRRREAT FReeper smackdown of Lindsey Graham!

Another smackdown of the “jackass”...here...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qeyrp-V3Jvc

HOORAY Ann Barnhardt!


44 posted on 07/05/2011 8:27:52 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laconic
“if we don’t fight them there, they will be in San Francisco”

It is actually a familiar pattern:

It is a given what kind of refugees Libya will export to the USA, regardless of who wins. Neither side of the conflict loves the USA.

45 posted on 07/05/2011 8:31:03 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) warned on Tuesday that Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi is "serious" about attacking European cities in order to pressure European officials to cease their airstrikes against Libya.

Oh My God, Gadhafi is going to respond to unprovoked and illegal military attacks against his country. He is a terrorist! Bomb the Libyan cities immediately!

Doesn't Gadhafi know that there is no such thing as national sovereignty in the NWO. You bow to the Globalists or pay the price!

46 posted on 07/06/2011 5:02:14 AM PDT by Roninf5-1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; rabscuttle385

” Graham can’t see the difference between siding with France and Europe against Hitler, and siding with members of Al Qaeda against Khadaffy.

And I thought I was a basher of the French. I’m a piker compared to Graham. “

LOL!


47 posted on 07/06/2011 6:21:45 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

;^)


48 posted on 07/06/2011 7:28:20 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Muslim Brotherhood (renames itself) the Liberty and Justice Party. NOT A JOKE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Impy

>>>Gaddaffi attacking Europe would the same thing as putting a gun is his mouth. Gaddaffi is not that insane or stupid.<<<

I’m not so sure about that. Spain capitulated to the jihadis after the train bombings a couple years ago. That said, I don’t think too many European nations have the intestinal fortitude to deal with SCUD strikes or etc. in return for supporting the jihadis in Libya.

Also, for all the prattling about international law I’m saying the Mr. Khaddafy can cite those same international laws when he strikes back at the countries that are attacking him. I just don’t see any justification (past British and French oil contracts) for the USA to be involved in Libya.


49 posted on 07/06/2011 9:15:27 AM PDT by MeganC (NO WAR FOR OIL! ........except when a Democrat's in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
I know we're a war-weary nation, but there is no upside to Gadhafi staying in power," he said. "That is a national security nightmare for this country."

Oh for God's sake- what bulltwinkie ! Like he just now has become a security nightmare, 20 years AFTER the Lockerbie bombing?

He wants to invade Europe ? Riiiighht.

50 posted on 07/06/2011 10:43:32 AM PDT by Red Boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson