Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Administration Asks Court To Halt Execution Of Mexican National In Texas
kwtx.com ^ | 7/1/2011 | kwtx

Posted on 07/06/2011 10:05:12 AM PDT by tutstar

Edited on 07/06/2011 10:26:36 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]

The Obama administration is taking the unusual step of asking the U.S. Supreme Court to stop Texas from executing a Mexican citizen who was convicted and sentenced to die for the rape and murder of a 16-year-old girl.

The administration is asking the court to delay the July 7 execution of Humberto Leal, 38, for as long as six months to give Congress time to consider legislation that would directly affect Leal's case.


(Excerpt) Read more at kwtx.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: aliens; bho44; bhodoj; bhofascism; bhomexico; capitalpunishment; corruption; criminalaliens; criminaldemocrats; deathrow; democratcorruption; dictator; execution; fubo; govtabuse; humbertoleal; leal; liberalfascism; mexico; mexicution; obama; scotus; texacution; texas; texasrapistdeath; treason; yourlawsdontapply2me
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Does it make a difference?

A raping murder should be excuted regardless of the citizenship status of his victim - or his.


41 posted on 07/06/2011 10:39:04 AM PDT by ZULU (Lindsey Graham is a nanometrical pustule of pusillanimous putrescence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rannug

That’s IT!!


42 posted on 07/06/2011 10:39:47 AM PDT by ZULU (Lindsey Graham is a nanometrical pustule of pusillanimous putrescence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

Good theory. I think this bunch and Mexico knew about the illegal gun running. That way Mexico could sue United States and Obama could use that towards gun sales here. Mexico gets money and this “bunch” could get stricter gun laws here. Any takers on that theory?


43 posted on 07/06/2011 10:42:37 AM PDT by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
Does it make a difference?

My point ZULU must have been lost on you.

If he lived here, he doesn't go whining to another country when he does the crime.

44 posted on 07/06/2011 10:45:29 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

This picture creeps me out.

45 posted on 07/06/2011 10:46:42 AM PDT by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: tutstar

Interesting little note: as per some old Sup. Ct. precedent, treaties that are not self-executing do not bind the states until Congress enacts legislation to put the treaty into effect. See, e.g., Whitney v. Robertson, 124 U.S. 190, 194 (1888).

In this case, notwithstanding that the treaty in question (which I do not know the name of off the top of my head) apparently does provide that the nationals of signatories are to be provided with consular assistance, the treaty itself appears - from the reports on the need to enact legislation to review alleged violations of the treaty - to not be self-executing and thus not binding on the states until and unless Congress enacts legislation making it so.

In other words, the State of Texas appears to be at liberty to ignore the provisions of this treaty until Congress has enacted legislation saying otherwise.

That means, in essence, that Obuttocks is trying to bootstrap the binding effect of the treaty by, in essence, claiming that it ought to be binding on Texas because, if you just give Congress enough time, Congress will do what it needs to do to make the treaty binding on Texas.


46 posted on 07/06/2011 10:48:17 AM PDT by Oceander (The phrase "good enough for government work" is not meant as a compliment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tutstar
ZERO wants us under UN rule, second to his own rule , of course. He is more concerned with that than he is with our own American laws.

snippet from UK Guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/05/obama-stop-texas-mexican-execution

Obama tries to stop execution in Texas of Mexican killer

US president warns Texan authorities that execution would put America in breach of international legal obligations

President Barack Obama is attempting to block the execution in Texas on Thursday of a Mexican man because it would breach an international convention and do "irreparable harm" to US interests.

47 posted on 07/06/2011 10:48:25 AM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

Well it does feel that way sometimes. We still have freedom to move about though and do most of our daily activities without interference.


48 posted on 07/06/2011 10:50:05 AM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo

Me too.


49 posted on 07/06/2011 10:51:15 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: All
WE NEED TO ASK THIS OVER AND OVER AGAIN TO ANYONE WHO'LL LISTEN Why is it lawbreakers have all their home countries.... the US govt and a succession of US presidents ..... defending their "rights?" And not even our own govt is protecting American interests?

News reports say Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Peru are conspiring to collude with The Anti-Defamation League, The American Civil Liberties Union, the Southern Poverty Law Center and several other civil and immigrant rights groups to infringe on US sovereignty to make laws as we see fit. The co-conspirators filed a federal class-action lawsuit against Georgia's law and are now asking a judge to halt the measure pending the outcome of their case.

=====================================

Nothing good has come from this plague of lawbreakers violating our borders. Illegals are a national security threat. They are conspiring to tear down democracy. Their home countries--and the US govt--- are helping them.

WAITING TO GET THEIR ORDERS FROM MEXICO

Reconquista shock troops at Phoenix Capital protest, May 29, 2010.

50 posted on 07/06/2011 10:53:02 AM PDT by Liz ( A taxpayer voting for Obama is like a chicken voting for Col Sanders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

If he’s been in the USA since he was 2, doesn’t the amnesty bill in 1986 make him an American citizen?

You want to be an anchor baby to get US citizens’ rights? Then suffer the consequence of US justice system.


51 posted on 07/06/2011 10:56:19 AM PDT by patriotsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
This is nothing but pandering to the hispanics by obama to shore up his ratings for election.

The victim was also Hispanic.

At least one of the judges who has already turned this case down is Hispanic.

More than one member of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles is also Hispanic.

Also, Gov. Perry can't give this guy anything but a one-time 30-day reprieve; he can't commute his sentence even if he wants to, unless he gets a written recommendation from a majority of the Board of Pardons and Paroles. I think they have already turned this one down.

This is not to say that I think Gov. Perry would be so inclined anyway, particularly not at the request of this President.

52 posted on 07/06/2011 10:56:34 AM PDT by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo


53 posted on 07/06/2011 11:02:52 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Imagine.... a world without islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: tutstar
Yes, we do, and I praise the Lord for that! I am also thankful that the extremity of this administration and its baldface attempts to destroy everything we hold dear, is waking the American people up.

We have to work for it, but we WILL save America from this Marxist menace.

54 posted on 07/06/2011 11:04:37 AM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
Good God, it's lunchtime (or was).

Why is it that most leftist women are uglier than homemade sin?

55 posted on 07/06/2011 11:06:10 AM PDT by Marathoner (564 days to go until the Marxist leaves office: Can we make it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: momtothree

Infuriating is an understatement.

Wonder what a psychiatrist would say about the Prez?


56 posted on 07/06/2011 11:07:03 AM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AuntB; Tennessee Nana; La Lydia; Clintonfatigued; stephenjohnbanker; Condor51; TADSLOS; raybbr; ...
BACKSTORY Mexican national Joe Medellin along with five others brutally and viciously raped, stomped, kicked, slashed and strangled two beautiful, young teenage girls in Houston in 1993 following a gang initiation. Medellin, though in this country illegally, had lived in Houston half his life at the time of the crime.

Medellin claimed that he should have received a new trial because he was a Mexican national and should have been allowed to contact the Mexican consulate for legal assistance. However, he had lived in the US since he was six years old and had gone to elementary, middle and high school here.

The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case in spring of 2005. In the meantime, then-US President George Bush instructed, via a "determination," that Texas courts comply with the 2004 ruling of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and hold a hearing for Medellin.

Texas refused to comply, saying that the federal government and the international ruling have no bearing on state criminal justice statutes. The US Supreme Court agreed to hear Medellin's case again, and sided with Texas against the President, saying that President Bush did not have the authority to order such a review.

Medellin was executed August 5, 2008. In his final statement, Medellin apologized for his part in the crime: "I'm sorry that my actions brought you pain. I hope this brings the closure to what you seek."

57 posted on 07/06/2011 11:07:10 AM PDT by Liz ( A taxpayer voting for Obama is like a chicken voting for Col Sanders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

O.K.

Sorry.


58 posted on 07/06/2011 11:21:55 AM PDT by ZULU (Lindsey Graham is a nanometrical pustule of pusillanimous putrescence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

hmmm I hadn’t thought about any connection. I wonder if the perp is related to anyone important in Mexico?


59 posted on 07/06/2011 11:24:15 AM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: patriotsoul

Excellent point.

But this isn’t about the law this is pure demagoguery.


60 posted on 07/06/2011 11:26:48 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson