Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teen faces prison after sex doll prank goes awry (Prosecutors gone wild, kid faces 8 years prison)
WSVM ^ | 07/06/2011 | AP News

Posted on 07/06/2011 2:09:59 PM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 last
To: Lazamataz; PapaBear3625
Incorrect. I have been charged with many felonies, never convicted. I have a great middle-class professional career.

You are the one who is incorrect. PapaBear3625 said a felony conviction, not being charged with a felony, would ruin the kids chances, and he is correct. You might try reading and understanding before your next comment, altho I will bet you don't.

101 posted on 07/06/2011 9:05:42 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I gather the doll was in the package, and the hoodie student likely wasn’t even thinking “bomb scare.” He was thinking “disgust some students, teachers, and administrators with a stupid sex toy, and keep it a secret who brought the toy.” With no intent to create a bomb scare, it’s a stretch to criminal mischief on anything, let alone an institution. If the hoodied package carrier was such a risk, why did it take video surveillance, rather than a passer-by, to raise the alarm? I bet a lot of students saw him and to a one they thought no big deal, this is somebody’s show and tell.


102 posted on 07/07/2011 2:34:04 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

Dangus said, “Just give an 18-year old a felony conviction so he can never get a decent job.”

My guess with a name like Tyrell, the kid probably already had a feloney record history. (Note I said “probably”)


103 posted on 07/07/2011 3:42:31 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

Dangus said, “Just give an 18-year old a felony conviction so he can never get a decent job.”

My guess with a name like Tyrell, the kid probably already had a feloney record history. (Note I said “probably”)

Opps, I meant “Tyell”


104 posted on 07/07/2011 3:44:07 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour

Jonathan Turley’s right on this - something very totalitarian is happening in the former ‘land of the free’.


105 posted on 07/07/2011 3:44:53 AM PDT by GOPJ (Black flash mobs: street level reflections of elite liberal hatred for middle class America..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLS
I am not exactly sure how they can charge him with anything. It was legit for him to be at his school. He took something in. Out of caution they called the cops because they could not identify him. Everytime the cops are called does not require someone be charged PARTICUALRY IF NO CRIME WAS COMMITTED.

The cops were called in and all they found was a blow-up sex doll.

The guy committed the most heinous crime he could commit in current society. He made government officials and police look stupid.

THAT is what they want to put him away for 8 years.
106 posted on 07/07/2011 4:56:51 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

That’s a lot of clarity for this early in the morning.

True, though.


107 posted on 07/07/2011 5:14:25 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism - "Who-whom?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The ultimate objective is to make everybody a felon. Kid won’t be able to possess a firearm or ammunition, either.


108 posted on 07/07/2011 5:24:46 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: patton

The Lautenberg amendment divests those who are convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence, and in some cases, no conviction, just a restraining order.


109 posted on 07/07/2011 5:29:55 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing
Real security requires thinking. In this case that was lacking.

You bring up a really good point; the question I would next ask is "What time was it?". If this were done either late at night, or early in the morning - then the school was correct in calling in a bomb squad to check out a suspicious package. During the day, if this were larger or was not a typical package - the student would be questioned.

But, pressing charges for something as harmless as this is ridiculous. If it had been a big box of soap; no charges would have been filed. This is a case where who ever is in charge; is too immature or mentally incompetent to hold the job they have been assigned. They should be removed from this position, as they have demonstrated that they are incapable of dealing with the responsibility of that job.

As for calling the Bomb squad to review a suspicious package - I would dare say that 90+% of the calls a bomb squad gets; are packages that were suspicious in nature, but contained harmless contents. The bomb squad is paid to check for dangerous packages, and in the few 'real' cases; to diffuse the bomb or detonate it under controlled circumstances. Calling the Bomb Squad was a safe, sane, practical and intelligent thing to do. What followed is pure incompetence.

110 posted on 07/07/2011 7:52:15 AM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour

Good thing I wasn’t an 18 year old in this era. Some of my old college pranks were legendary. :)


111 posted on 07/07/2011 8:02:00 AM PDT by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Excellent point.


112 posted on 07/07/2011 9:59:13 PM PDT by JLS (How to turn a recession into a depression: elect a Dem president with a big majorities in Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson