Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judiciary Committee Launches Probe of Kaganís Involvement in Obamacare
Cybercast News Service ^ | 7/6/11 | Terence P. Jeffrey

Posted on 07/06/2011 8:18:10 PM PDT by Nachum

The House Judiciary Committee is launching an investigation to probe the involvement that Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan had in “health care legislation or litigation” when she was serving as President Barack Obama’s solicitor general and was responsible for defending the administration’s position in federal court cases. The investigation will look at whether Kagan is required by law to recuse herself from judging cases challenging President Obama’s health-care law and whether her answers to questions posed by the Senate Judiciary Committee during her confirmation process were accurate.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: committee; conflictofinterest; cultureofcorruption; elenakagan; judiciary; kagan; launches; probe; scotus
Maybe we can have two impeachment trials....
1 posted on 07/06/2011 8:18:14 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


2 posted on 07/06/2011 8:19:05 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

BTTT.


3 posted on 07/06/2011 8:29:00 PM PDT by PA Engineer (SP/AW12: Time to beat the swords of government tyranny into the plowshares of freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

whooooheeeee....


4 posted on 07/06/2011 8:30:07 PM PDT by goodnesswins (...both islam and the democrat plantation thrive on poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Does anyone really expect Kagan to recuse herself, do you really think she will suffer any kind of damage or punishment. This will change nothing. Laws do not pertain to rats.


5 posted on 07/06/2011 8:33:25 PM PDT by Licensed-To-Carry (Hey Obama! All you have done is awaken a sleeping giant and filled us with a terrible resolve!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Kagan has no business being on the Supreme Court. NONE! She is unfit and incompetent. IMHO.


6 posted on 07/06/2011 8:38:55 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (When the going gets tough, the tough check themselves into "rehab".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Domestic Enemies and Radical Extremists.


7 posted on 07/06/2011 8:55:47 PM PDT by MtnClimber (Osama and Obama both have friends that bombed the Pentagon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Regime change in the courts. Impeach activist judges!
8 posted on 07/06/2011 9:04:48 PM PDT by TigersEye (Wranglers not Levis. Levi Strauss is anti-2nd Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

small potatoes compared to what she did during the Clinton years during the partial birth abortion debate.
She tampered with a sworn statement from doctors - changed it’s meaning to the opposite of what they actually said, and defrauded the Supreme Court with it.

This alone should have caused her to lose her job, be disbarred, and charged with a crime.

I can’t believe republicans are so spineless that they didn’t fight tooth and nail agains this piece of work.


9 posted on 07/06/2011 9:12:47 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
This will go nowhere. Justice will obstruct justice just like they are doing with the GunWalker scandal. ‘Rats are NEVER held accountable. If the public knew even HALF the truth about the ‘Rats, the Dems would NEVER have any power ever again.
10 posted on 07/06/2011 9:57:54 PM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

"Look, for the millionth time, I am NOT A LESBIAN!! OKAY??"

- Elena "Carpet Muncher" Kagan.

11 posted on 07/06/2011 10:54:52 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Gore Lauds Romney on Climate Position; 0bamaCare was based on RomneyCare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“The investigation will look at whether Kagan is required by law to recuse herself from judging cases challenging President Obama’s health-care law and whether her answers to questions posed by the Senate Judiciary Committee during her confirmation process were accurate”

“Accurate”???? Ya mean did she LIE or perjure herself? And what would the House do about it when the king demands she still can sit on this issue?


12 posted on 07/07/2011 5:52:16 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

>Maybe we can have two impeachment trials....<

I doubt that they will go so far as to challenge her for lying under oath during her confirmation hearings.

But it will screw Obama out of his ace in the hole on the health care law when it goes before the SCOTUS


13 posted on 07/07/2011 7:22:00 AM PDT by Munz (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Licensed-To-Carry

One thing that _shouldn’t_ have surprised me is when they went after “one of ours” to recuse himself in the 0bamacare case,

because they knew that one of theirs SHOULD recuse herself due to blatant involvement and conflict of interest.

The left always accuses others of what they’re doing.


14 posted on 07/07/2011 7:23:56 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

Seriously, I don’t know WHAT she is,
and I couldn’t care less about her “preferences”.

But she was put on the court for the very reason of advancing the commies’ agenda, so there’s no way she will recuse herself in this grand step forward called 0bamacare.

And there’s no way an impeachment will force the issue, either.


15 posted on 07/07/2011 7:29:32 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson