Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama expected to take 'executive action' on 'gun safety'
GOPUSA.com ^ | July 8, 2011 | Erica Werne

Posted on 07/08/2011 5:20:10 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; wku man; SLB; ...
Well, since Obeyme can't force his anti-gun agenda through any of the proper legislative channels, it only makes sense that he would attempt to appease his base by executive fiat.

It was only a matter of time.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

41 posted on 07/08/2011 7:20:07 PM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
"The president directed the attorney general to form working groups with key stakeholders to identify common-sense measures that would improve American safety and security while fully respecting Second Amendment rights," Carney said Thursday.

Bullsh*t!

42 posted on 07/08/2011 7:22:28 PM PDT by Jagdgewehr (Another American Revolution draws nigh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
"Just Impeach this man!"

Takes too long.See my tagline.

43 posted on 07/08/2011 7:25:04 PM PDT by matthew fuller (Forget impeachment- Extradite obama, biden, clinton and holder. Country saved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
"To what existing "reporting laws" is Bloomberg's group referring here?"

The AZ shooter was a clear mental case who had been banned from school -- including requiring a physicianl's "clean bill of mental health" before he could return to school.

The dumb@$$ local sheriff could have blocked his gun purchase on that basis -- but let him slide.

The NICS check includes a field for rejection based on mental health. That was not done -- even though the warning signs were clear -- if the school MH issue had been reported to the database.

Maybe they are trying to sneak in a requirement for a MH clearance before gun purchase -- as part of the Fed background check.

The above is just my guess...

44 posted on 07/08/2011 7:31:46 PM PDT by TXnMA (There is no Constitutional right to NOT be offended.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

“physicianl’s “ — no charge for the exra “l”... ‘-}


45 posted on 07/08/2011 7:37:07 PM PDT by TXnMA (There is no Constitutional right to NOT be offended.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

As bad as this is going to be, wait until the other shoe drops. Then we’re all in.


46 posted on 07/08/2011 7:45:46 PM PDT by Noumenon (The only 'NO' a liberal understands is the one that arrives at muzzle velocity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe

Our prayers are similar. Ah, well - a fine weekend to work the good old AQT. 500 yard head shots are the name of my game.


47 posted on 07/08/2011 7:48:26 PM PDT by Noumenon (The only 'NO' a liberal understands is the one that arrives at muzzle velocity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6XOxduodKU


48 posted on 07/08/2011 7:59:34 PM PDT by Dick Bachert (The 2012 election is coming. Seems we have MORE TRASH TO REMOVE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Yep. Banning the person to person gun sale because there is no paperwork is coming. From the same dictator who apparently sent 30,000 guns south of the border in order to frame up American gun dealers.


49 posted on 07/08/2011 8:05:38 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

I doubt seriously that I will even pay attention to his EO. I’ve already got guns and ammunition and even more importantly, I live in Texas not some puke state like Illinois.


50 posted on 07/08/2011 8:37:07 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (There's a pill for just about everything ... except stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Prosecutions in the Department of Justice for violating current gun laws???


51 posted on 07/08/2011 8:41:26 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Shove your EO up your ass, Barry.


52 posted on 07/08/2011 8:47:12 PM PDT by EdReform (Oath Keepers - Guardians of the Republic - Honor your oath - Join us: www.oathkeepers.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jiminycricket000

The Republicans would have to grow a set of balls and a spine before they would stand up to ANY Rat president.


53 posted on 07/08/2011 8:51:36 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Artcore

I won’t say what I’d like to because I don’t want the law at my door in 2 minutes.


54 posted on 07/08/2011 9:00:39 PM PDT by unkus (Silence = Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

My current thoughts and opinions are un-printable at this time.


55 posted on 07/08/2011 9:08:16 PM PDT by Drill Thrawl (No one is more against progress than a progressive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

“Perhaps I am mistaken, but Congress can negate Executive Orders.”

Maybe I’m also mistaken, but my understanding is that the only entity who can strike down an EO is a future president. That’s why Obama’s EO’s are so scary - they’re like royal proclamations (but his most dangerous ones are done under the radar) - untouchable.

I hope I’m wrong - anyone?


56 posted on 07/08/2011 9:16:26 PM PDT by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Obama and Holder have killed more people than that crazy Tucson shooter.


57 posted on 07/08/2011 9:18:01 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolsti2

That was an odd choice, though. I am sure there is a better example, but probably under a liberal President.


58 posted on 07/08/2011 9:21:33 PM PDT by rlmorel ("Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions." Gilbert K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: llandres

As you had hoped, you are wrong. Congress can override an executive order by enacting legislation that conflicts with the order - the President is duty-bound to enforce the laws enacted by Congress, and to not act contrary to those laws. Of course, just because it can be done doesn’t mean that it can be done easily - most obviously, a President who wanted to protect an executive order of his could veto a bill intended to override that order; it would then take a supermajority in Congress to override that veto. Congress could also simply prohibit any funding for the activities called for in the executive order.


59 posted on 07/08/2011 9:23:56 PM PDT by Oceander (The phrase "good enough for government work" is not meant as a compliment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
Were you trying to get on me in a groupthink style? ‘If he brings up x, burn em!!’.

Reagan did blow it with that 86 law. Bush Sr did some bad things as well. W did mostly great on guns, the sunsetting of the AWB I'll still give to Tom Delay though.

Watch the accusations though, it's not a good mentality.

60 posted on 07/08/2011 9:25:40 PM PDT by Tolsti2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson