Skip to comments.
Critics say Border Patrol access bill would ruin environment
SIERRA VISTA Herald/Review ^
| Matthew Trotter
Posted on 07/09/2011 6:33:34 AM PDT by SandRat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
1
posted on
07/09/2011 6:33:41 AM PDT
by
SandRat
To: SandRat
2
posted on
07/09/2011 6:34:30 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: SandRat
1505 may succeed in decreasing immigration, but only because the water, air and environments of border communities will be so degraded, no one will want to come here, said Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Tucson.
This man is certifiably NVTZ!
3
posted on
07/09/2011 6:45:38 AM PDT
by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: Don Corleone
At present, things help his reconquista amigos.
4
posted on
07/09/2011 6:50:33 AM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: cripplecreek
And illegals pooping in the woods won’t?
5
posted on
07/09/2011 7:12:48 AM PDT
by
bboop
(Stealth Tutor)
To: SandRat
36 Laws! Who in the Hell passes this crap? Throw these idiots OUT NOW!
6
posted on
07/09/2011 7:47:55 AM PDT
by
Cheetahcat
( November 4 2008 ,A date that will live in Infamy.)
To: SandRat
Another example of creeping, insidious Federal overreach...why do we have ANY environmental regulations focused on the areas within 100 mile of the US Border?
It’s time to take back the country. Dumping the EPA would be a good start.
7
posted on
07/09/2011 7:52:28 AM PDT
by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
To: SandRat
This is too stupid for a subtle response so,
Dear Raul, GFYS!
8
posted on
07/09/2011 8:02:27 AM PDT
by
WellyP
To: SandRat
Close that part of the border to illegal traffic and the trashing of the area will be diminished overall.
9
posted on
07/09/2011 8:25:37 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: SandRat
"Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Tucson" Imagine that! An Irish conservative running interference for the criminal invaders...
10
posted on
07/09/2011 8:27:05 AM PDT
by
TXnMA
(There is no Constitutional right to NOT be offended.)
To: SandRat
This is not without precedent. Under Bush, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff waived more than 30 environmental laws along the border to be able to proceed with the fence. It caused a huge uproar from San Diego to Brownsville, but, strangely, the world as we know it did not end and there were never any reports of environmental degradation as a result of his actions. El ruco loco de Raul Grijalva raised a big, ridiculously stupid stink when it happened. He opposes, on principle, any attempt to enforce American law except for the environmental-kumbaya stuff.
11
posted on
07/09/2011 8:33:18 AM PDT
by
La Lydia
To: SandRat
"Critics say Border Patrol access bill would ruin environment"
~~~~
And wetback crap like this doesn't?
(For multiple pages of similar scenes, search Google Images for "illegal alien trash"...)
12
posted on
07/09/2011 8:40:26 AM PDT
by
TXnMA
(There is no Constitutional right to NOT be offended.)
To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..
Ping!
Grijalva is one of a handful of reps pushing to create federally-protected lands that create a corridor for free transit from the border to Tucson.
This is totally in character for the traitor.
13
posted on
07/09/2011 8:42:09 AM PDT
by
HiJinx
(Old Cold Warrior)
To: SandRat
1505 may succeed in decreasing immigration, but only because the water, air and environments of border communities will be so degraded, no one will want to come here, said Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Tucson.As opposed to the sh!tholes they are leaving? The man is a lunatic.
14
posted on
07/09/2011 8:46:47 AM PDT
by
raybbr
(People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
To: Don Corleone
Shove whatever NVTZ is up your backside!
15
posted on
07/09/2011 8:51:31 AM PDT
by
dalereed
To: TXnMA; SandRat
The first image displayed OK in "Preview"... Let's try this:
16
posted on
07/09/2011 8:51:42 AM PDT
by
TXnMA
(There is no Constitutional right to NOT be offended.)
To: TXnMA
That’s just what I was going to say? Who will be more destructive to the environment? Large gangs of Mexicans throwing all their garbage, clothing, and dead bodies all over the place, turning square miles of country into Litter Heaven, or a few well-disciplined Border patrollers?
This is a false argument if there ever, was one.
17
posted on
07/09/2011 8:54:54 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: SandRat
In the 60’s & early 70’s the debate among radicals was how best to overthrow the USA. One side was the overthrow violently from the outside. The other side was the work from within, take over everything and then make the changes.
It looks very much like the work from within side won the argument.
It is no accident that so many 60’s and 70’s radicals are in positions of influence and power - in government at all levels, in the schools, ngo’s, foundations, everywhere.
And we are seeing the fruit of their efforts.
18
posted on
07/09/2011 9:21:22 AM PDT
by
hfr
(And nothing has changed except that it's easier to see nowadays.)
To: Borax Queen; idratherbepainting; AZHSer; Sabertooth; A Navy Vet; Lion Den Dan; Free the USA; ...
19
posted on
07/09/2011 9:59:09 AM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: cripplecreek
The watermelons don’t seem to be concerned about overpopulation and it’s effect on resources and the environment, either.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson