Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who, what, why: Is North Dakota really a US state?
BBC News ^ | 14th July 2011 | Tom Geoghegan

Posted on 07/14/2011 10:00:21 AM PDT by the scotsman

'North Dakota is amending its constitution because of a long-standing technical omission that some claim makes its statehood invalid. So does that mean it's really just a US territory and not a state at all?

Every American child is taught there are 50 states in the US.

But an 82-year-old care home resident in Grand Forks, North Dakota, is throwing the truth of that universally held statement into some doubt.

While reading the state constitution, which is 40 years older than he is, John Rolczynski noticed it omitted to mention the executive branch when explaining which new officers need to take the oath supporting the US Constitution.

This, he says, makes the state constitution invalid because it is in conflict with the federal constitution, which requires all officers of the three branches of state government - executive, judicial and legislative - be bound by the oath.'

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: North Dakota; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: dakota; north; northdakota; state
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: Vigilanteman

I am just kidding you.

I have a customer in Powers Lake(NE of Minot). He tells me how he will play an 18 hole round of golf after work in the summer.

He plays & coaches a lot of basketball in the winter.


41 posted on 07/15/2011 7:11:24 AM PDT by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: woodbutcher1963
No offense taken. North Dakotans (and former North Dakotans) tell the best North Dakota jokes.

And the best Norwegian jokes. The best Sven and Ole jokes. And the best Ole and Lena jokes.

42 posted on 07/15/2011 8:41:45 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: CT-Freeper

>It does actually. Read Article VI carefully.
>It requires state legislatures/executives/judicials to be bound by an oath.

That oath is specified, IIRC, in the US Code; so isn’t it a moot point?
(IOW, the US Constitution does not specify the wording of the oath either.)


43 posted on 07/18/2011 5:38:03 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson