Skip to comments.
The Racist and Homophobic Yard Sale Posting You Won’t Believe
GAWKER ^
| July 18, 2011
| Brian Moylan
Posted on 07/18/2011 9:08:18 PM PDT by Beaten Valve
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 last
To: Beaten Valve
"...except for LGBT people, illegal immigrants, and muslims, anyone else is warmly welcomed!"Okay, I can understand illegal immigrants and muslims... but what has he got against garden railroading fans?!
61
posted on
07/19/2011 6:03:58 AM PDT
by
Hatteras
To: MrB
There really isn’t a word for what ‘homophobic’ is supposed to be used for.
There is a root word, ‘miso’ , meaning ‘hatred’, as in misogynist, meaning ‘hatred of women’.
I came across a apparently recently coined word ‘misohomy’ which they use to mean ‘hatred of homosexuals’. So, one prcaticing it would be a ‘misohomist’. It may catch on.
62
posted on
07/19/2011 6:06:52 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(PEAS in our time? Obama cries PEAS! PEAS! when there is no PEAS!..........................)
To: TigersEye
What he needed to say was no fags, ragheads or wetbacks. "No Fags, Hags, or Rags".
63
posted on
07/19/2011 6:08:33 AM PDT
by
Hacksaw
(I don't hate Mormons.)
To: wardaddy
Folks were banned here for saying wetb***..just a few years agoAn Austin talk show host lost his job for using that term on the air several years ago too.
64
posted on
07/19/2011 7:49:54 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(zero hates Texas and we hate him back. He ain't my president either.)
To: ElkGroveDan
My guess would be it is an article planted to get a desired reaction, disguised, though, as having a different intent. It looks like media manipulation.
65
posted on
07/19/2011 9:53:48 AM PDT
by
gunsequalfreedom
(Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
To: Red Badger
I came across a apparently recently coined word misohomy which they use to mean hatred of homosexuals. So, one prcaticing it would be a misohomist. It may catch on.That makes the LGBTs misoheteroists.
66
posted on
07/19/2011 12:26:06 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Wranglers not Levis. Levi Strauss is anti-2nd Amendment.)
To: wardaddy
Take it easy. My point was that is how liberals perceive so-called old school rednecks and what they would supposedly say in the 2000’s. Not to say anything negative about Southerners in general. That lib hoaxer couldn’t even be a good anti-Southerner bigot. And BTW, IMHO, southern whites were less “racist” than northern whites both in 1950 and today. They got a bad rap in the media, because all that was shown were the vocal racists yelling at black people and treating them shamefully. The media never showed the vast majority of Southerners who weren’t and aren’t racist. The whites in that region had a lot more interaction with black people than northerners, and valued them as friends, co-workers, neighbors, etc. In the north, blacks were more likely to live in urban neighborhoods that had less interaction with whites, thus less chance to get to know them that way. I can’t speak for NYC, but I knew a heck of a lot more racists in the Midwest than I ever did in the South.
67
posted on
07/19/2011 2:16:38 PM PDT
by
boop
("Let's just say they'll be satisfied with LESS"... Ming the Merciless)
To: boop
You are right.
I apologize
I had seen freepers on another thread blaming southern bigotry for why blacks vote 95 percent for Bro
Got a mite steamed but ignored them and then lashed out at you for a less offensive post..like I got a right to not be offended..lol
I’m nothing if not a defensive southerner but was wrong to fire at you
68
posted on
07/19/2011 11:34:55 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(Palin or Bachman..either with Marco....I'm often on a DroidX..in bed late...hence my spelling..sorry)
To: Revolting cat!
Well don't don't want your couch being licked by the filthiest people alive.
69
posted on
07/19/2011 11:44:11 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The liberal press applauded when the NY Times hacked Newt Gingrich's phone calls.)
To: willgolfforfood; Revolting cat!; wagglebee
Just how many collectible nick nacks does a homosexual need anyway?
70
posted on
07/19/2011 11:46:47 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The liberal press applauded when the NY Times hacked Newt Gingrich's phone calls.)
To: kcvl
Gee, another member of the lavender mafia. 10-1 in the media and everybody thinks 25% of America is somewhat bi.
If don’t ask don’t tell is such bad policy, why do all of the gay anchors and editors remain closeted?
71
posted on
07/19/2011 11:48:42 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The liberal press applauded when the NY Times hacked Newt Gingrich's phone calls.)
To: ElkGroveDan
GBLTs offend mulsims. Gay bacon samiches.
72
posted on
07/19/2011 11:50:11 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The liberal press applauded when the NY Times hacked Newt Gingrich's phone calls.)
To: llandres
The Left has been trying to align the Sharia law muslims with the gay community. Seems the gay community just doesn’t understand what Sharia law prohibits.
73
posted on
07/19/2011 11:51:22 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The liberal press applauded when the NY Times hacked Newt Gingrich's phone calls.)
To: Rashputin
If you can’t sell lemonade on a street corner without 3 permits, you can’t go selling used merchandise without proper paperwork...
74
posted on
07/19/2011 11:53:03 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The liberal press applauded when the NY Times hacked Newt Gingrich's phone calls.)
To: 21twelve
The note in english had something like: Muslims get out the U.S. (something like this, and awkard and poor lettering) And below it was the arabic language written very nicely and with proper grammar. Of course I showed it to my kids and they could answer correctly Does this look like it is written by an old white guy, or by someone from another country? The news never reported it like that though. The newspaper editor didn't have that font.
75
posted on
07/19/2011 11:54:17 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The liberal press applauded when the NY Times hacked Newt Gingrich's phone calls.)
To: hattend
Bunch of drama queens. DUH. That defines the homosexual existence.
76
posted on
07/19/2011 11:57:36 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The liberal press applauded when the NY Times hacked Newt Gingrich's phone calls.)
To: MrB
Muslims see their identity as a race. If you are not BORN muslim, you are subhuman in their eyes.
You may even be considered the offspring of pigs and monkeys. Even a convert to Islam is unfit to marry their daughters. But if they seize YOUR daughters in jihad, well they are “good enough”.
77
posted on
07/20/2011 12:00:16 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The liberal press applauded when the NY Times hacked Newt Gingrich's phone calls.)
To: MrB
Just look at the recent “conscientious objector” who refused to do battle against muslims.
Islamic supremacist is an ideology and they do believe it is birthright.
78
posted on
07/20/2011 12:01:28 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The liberal press applauded when the NY Times hacked Newt Gingrich's phone calls.)
To: a fool in paradise
“Seems the gay community just doesnt understand what Sharia law prohibits.”
True. Nor do feminists, or Libs in general. They just don’t get it, that they’ll be the first to go in the mass beheadings of all us Infidels.
A year or two ago, in one of his fanatical speeches at our liberal colleges (Columbia U, I believe) Ahmedinejad proudly stated that there are no gays in Iran.
True - because he has all of them killed.
79
posted on
07/20/2011 12:04:18 AM PDT
by
llandres
(Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
To: llandres
But recently, the Lavender Mafia was up in arms because Michelle Bachmann signed a pledge against same sex marriage and Sharia law. They didn’t line item veto the Sharia law bit, they were against her being against theocratic rule by a foreign power.
Dumb a s*** but then they pack enough, must be up to their eyeballs. Can’t see the stupidity of their rhetorical politics.
80
posted on
07/20/2011 12:06:43 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The liberal press applauded when the NY Times hacked Newt Gingrich's phone calls.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson