Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears
Mr Robinson believes that because of the cost required to move him out, he will be able to stay in the house. Under occupancy laws, if he remains there for three years he can ask the court for the title.

Something for nothing.

Can one be sued and removed for not keeping the upscale property in an appropriate upscale condition?

27 posted on 07/20/2011 11:48:20 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.. VOTE out the RATS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TribalPrincess2U

Abandoned houses fail the Upscale test.
No matter how big they are.

If the guy so much as cuts the grass and keeps shingles on it, that is better than the abandoned state it was in before.

The people with standing to sue, are the people who walked away.

The people on the housing bubble threads have been explaining how this will play out for years. Here are abandoned homes being awarded to people who move in and maintain them appearing just as predicted. Sort of a couterpart to the “unexpected” take Keynesians have on everything.


52 posted on 07/20/2011 1:14:11 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson