Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Chandler

That’s really stretching the concept of Adverse Possession almost to the breaking point. It was meant to cover things like people walking through your property to get to the beach. If you don’t make any attempt to stop them or to cut-off access, after seven years it is assumed you don’t care and it is considered to be a public thoroughfare.


30 posted on 07/20/2011 11:51:20 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: All

Watch as ACORN and similar Leftists groups start to take advantage of this. How would you like hoards of welfarists swarming into your neighbor.

Amazing how little thought is displayed around here where it is supposed to be important. I could understand DU cheering this kind of crap but FReepers? Geez are we screwed.


34 posted on 07/20/2011 11:56:39 AM PDT by arrogantsob (Why do They hate her so much?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Yeah someone here said yesterday that this legal concept was in order to establish fencelines.


41 posted on 07/20/2011 12:04:36 PM PDT by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I think you may be thinking of a prescriptive easement.


78 posted on 07/20/2011 4:06:12 PM PDT by Katherine Ann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson