Posted on 07/23/2011 12:11:38 PM PDT by opentalk
While the leftist and Islamic supremacist ghouls rush to portray Norway mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik as a Christian and even as an anti-jihadist, the unanswered questions multiply. Why did a jihad group take credit for the atrocities, and then retract? And who altered the murderer's Facebook page? Yesterday, at the time that his name was released, his Facebook page looked like this (hat tip Vivien for the screenshot):
But shortly thereafter, this screenshot started circulating, of an altered Facebook page on which Breivik identified himself as a Christian and a conservative: (screenshot hat tip Vivien)
Did he have two different Facebook pages, one in Norwegian and one in English, and he only identified himself as a Christian and a conservative on the English one? Or did he pause from his murder spree to add "Christian" and "conservative" to his Facebook profile? Or maybe the whole page is a fake, as has been reported here.
But in the case, who faked it, and why? Who is so anxious to portray Breivik as a Christian and conservative? And if this was faked, can we trust any of the material that is now being released about Breivik being anti-jihad?
A lot of the things on the “shooter’s” facebook page don’t see right. Why start posting links to music videos a few days before the act when you have no friends linked to your profile in the system?
I may be going out on a limb here, but I am thinking a man who shoots 90 children dead is neither a Christian nor a Conservative.
Roger that.
They learned well from Nero. He burned Rome and blamed the Christians. It worked.
I am certain the English one is fake. I outlined all the reasons yesterday on a couple of threads but they include:
1. Everything was in English, his comments (the couple he made) had no indication they were translated, very casual English.
2. All the ‘likes’ were of US TV shows and movies in English, nothing Norwegian.
3. The page was made supposedly on the 17th and all the posts on the wall were done within a couple hour period, many within seconds of each other like someone was filling it up.
3. In Norway, there is a different name for the Conservative party (Høyre).
4. He had no friends at all, no one else commented on anything.
5. Facebook deleted it with all the other fake profiles.
6. There was no Google cache of the page and Google indexes Facebook often indicating it was a lot newer than it appeared.
Fake profiles go up every time something like this happens. It isn’t hard to create these and I think you can even spoof the time by just changing your system clock. More likely though (as someone pointed out) you can just take another profile and modify it (change name, picture, remove all other personal ID, etc).
The Facebook profile is very, very, very suspect.
The leftist apologists for Muslim terrorism are eager to deflect attention away from Islamic murderers and are obviously hoping to concoct a ‘Christian Conservative’ terrorist profile for Anders Behring Breivik. The reality is that, no matter who Breivik was or what he believed, while Islam condones murder and hate, Christianity (as taught by Jesus Christ) does the opposite with love as it’s core virtue.
Probably Napolitano, tripping over herself as soon as the news broke to justify her “Right wing extremists are the biggest threat to this country” comment.
How true, but then again let’s remember who does project that christians and conservatives are capable of this type of unspeakable horror. Liberals do not think...
Of course he isn’t either, its an obvious frame up.
Wow. I dont believe a thing right now. Interesting the chap is still alive.
Who knows. It could be anyone. It could even conceivably be an inside job. There are too many ties to this White House at Facebook. Nevertheless, the damage has been done. Someone wants to tie this mass murder to Christian Conservatives. So, they’re neither Christian or Conservative.
I am a very light Facebook user. Could the variance we see between these two views be a function of Facebook changing around what is presented when you log into it? In addition to the Christian and Conservative entries being present in the first view, also note that TV and Spill are not present in the 2nd listing - so what is to say that Christian and Conservative were simply not present in the first viewe due to the way Facebook handles views and refreshes?
It's a honest question - I don't know enought about how Facebook works to answer it, but for this claim to hold up it will need to be answered, IMO.
Janet Napolitano.
sfl
The money people behind Obama have enough cash and international connections to pull this off, because I doubt one man could have done these terror acts alone. Doing this in the U.S.A. would be problematical, at best.
Remember, Obama is about setting up a Global government, a socialist utopia.
We’ve been expecting a false flag scenario on the part of the Obamunists. This may be it.
Do you normally go on conspiracy theories first?
Your #1 is wrong. A lot of Norwegians typef better English and more natively than most Americans can.
All the rest of your stuff depends on your #1 which is blatantly wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.