Boop His Tiny Tail!
Before He Turns Into an Enormous Fire-Breathing Monster
Donate!
A Sponsoring FReeper
Will contribute $10 for each New Monthly Donor
Posted on 07/24/2011 10:42:35 AM PDT by FReepaholic
(Google translation)
In Anders Behring Breivik Manifesto , which was announced on Saturday , he explains, among other things, the ideological background for the bombing and mass killing of Utøya.
What he does not say anything about, is that key parts of his manifesto is directly copied from the Una-bomber, Ted Kaczynski 's manifesto, "Unabomber's manifesto."
It is document.no , the Islam-critical site where Behring Breivik should have been an avid debater, which reveal plagiarism.
He has replaced the concepts, so it should fit better into his own ideology. For example, switching him out the word "Leftism" (left orientation) with the words "Multiculturalism" and "Cultural Marxism" (Multiculturalism and cultural Marxism)
The example below shows some of Anders Behring Breivik has copied.
From Una-bomb's Manifesto:
One of the most Wide spread manifestations of the craziness of our world is leftism, so a discussion of the psychology of leftism Can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of modern society in general.
But what is leftism? Hum the first half of the 20th century leftism could have been practically Identified with Socialism. Today the movement is fragmented and it is not clear WHO Can pray properly called a leftist.
When we speak of leftist in this article we garden in mind Mainly Socialists, Collectivist, "politically correct" types, feminists, gay and disability Activists, Animal Rights Activists and the like. But not everyone Who is associate with one of These movements is a leftist.
What we are Trying to get that in discussing leftism is not so much a movement or an Ideology as a psychological type, or Rather a collection of related types. THUS, what we mean by "leftism" will emerge more Clearly in the course of our discussion of leftist psychology
from Anders Behring Breivik's Manifesto:
One of the most wide spread manifestations of the craziness of our world is Multiculturalism, so a discussion of the psychology of multiculturalists Can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of Western Europe in general.
But what is Multiculturalism or Cultural Communism? The movement is fragmented and it is not clear WHO Can pray properly called a cultural Marxist.
When we speak of cultural Marxists in this article we garden in mind Mainly Individuals WHO support Multiculturalism; Socialists, Collectivist, "politically correct" types, feminists, gay and disability Activists, Animal Rights Activists, Environmentalist, etc. But not everyone Who is associate with One of These movements support Multiculturalism.
What we are Trying to get that in discussing cultural Marxists is not so much a movement or an Ideology as a psychological type, or Rather a collection of related types
- this is very interesting, says violence researcher Ragnhild Bjørnebekk the Police Academy.
Apparently, Norwegian authorities give the press some sort of access to accused persons like this, and he plans to make some sort of statement then, which is consistent with political true believer behavior, they seek publicity for the cause.
He is not necessarily sane. He may be a ringer, a sacrifice, or a useful idiot, we just don't have enough information yet.
Here’s a foreign student member of the poltical group on the island explaining his experience. I still ask. especially seeing the size of this student, why they didn’t come together in that hour and a half and take this guy down?
This guy was very meticulous in what he was going to do and clearly seen in his manifesto...he took the time and thought to arrange every detail I believe including his giving himself up and plans to use the media to get his word out....no doubt believes in his cause.
http://blogs.aljazeera.net/liveblog/Oslo-Bombing
I agree.
What did he google “manifesto” ??
I can't explain, but I have a theory (just a theory):
The Norwegian life experience for younger Norwegians does not include enough learning moments encouraging individualist problem solving leadership thinking.
Young Norwegians are not exposed to "seize the day" thinking scenarios, but rather, "form a committee" scenarios. That typifies socialist education, and Norway has only international Socialists (the Left), and National Socialists (the not so far left). There are no cowboys or vigilance committees in Norway.
That may be so but his involvement in FreeMasonary distorted whatever belief he had in Christianity as his consistant references to Knights Templar, Crusades etc. attest to.....
Which is generally what organizations and false religions do. They twist Christianity to formulate and incorporate their agenda...which is exactly as this guy did to justify his behavior to himself...add in the political leanings, coupled with the media's and others refusal to hear him out or give creedance to what his agenda is...you have a firebomb ready to explode..and it did just that.
This guy had a serious need to be heard and belong...he found that with Masonery to some extent as they are a close knit group. Also his other affiliations gave him the satisfaction for belonging.
AH YES! Indeed Navy....this would explain that very well theory or not..and we see the same dumbing down of American youth as well.....the collective think-struck without defined critical thinking skills.
With that in mind then, they were all ‘waiting’ to be saved by someone other than themselves...I was amazed how many mentioned they were ‘hiding’ for ‘an hour or more’. My head would have been assessing the situation and determining a plan of action ....as would my sons.
So in a sense it would also be a culture thing for the Norweigians. They simply are not programmed to think independantly.
He states in his manifesto....
“Call all my INVESTOR CONTACTS with updated online prospectives./pdf”
I must complete capitalization of the mineral extraction project by Aug. at least! When I have acquired enough seed capital I will have enough to employee the services of professional blasting engineers.
(his first successful test detonation of a bomb in a remote location on June 13.)
“How do we know that this “manifesto” is not a fraud?”
A lot easier to false flag this attack to cover Islamic terrorism like by just cutting and pasting.
There are good grounds for wondering, as blogger at Unercoverage points out:
“There is no proof of Breivik’s motivations for the crime as yet. There is considerable evidence and the method and technique suggests an Al Qaeda “Mumbai” multi-bomb, multi-location type attack. Recruitment and radicalization of “locals” is not new to the Al Qaeda movement. There are many “white” American jihadis who were recruited to various Al Qaeda sects over the years. [Investigative Project for Terrorism.]http://www.investigativeproject.org/3052/shabaab-essay-boasts-of-western-recruits
As reported previously here at UNCOVERAGE, there is a long litany of Islamic extremist activity in Norway.” http://www.uncoverage.net/2011/07/91-dead-in-norway-right-wing-extremist-theory-ignores-al-qaeda-threats/#comment-36931
I did a Google search for the first sentence and found this Facebook page.
The passage you cite is lifted directly from Americans for Impeachment of Marxists.
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=242193496056
This is evidence that the whole manifesto is a fraud.
If he did the attack to “market” his manifesto, wouldn’t you expect that the manifesto would be his own creation and not a cut and paste effort?
Sounds to me like a crafty bit of propaganda by Islamists.
He’s apparently copied whole sections of the Unabomber manifesto, and cites (with proper credit, at least), many segments from postings written by the blogger ‘fjordman’.
In regard to AIM, on pages 1265-1266 of the Manifesto, he cites AIM (and uses the quote) as an “innocent looking” Facebook template that can be used in order to create a pan-European terrorist network.
I don’t however, suspect Islamists were behind this. That’s like seeing Reds under every bed. You know, the right is just as capable of terrorism as anyone else. Evil doesn’t recognize, nor is it limited to, any particular ideology.
““Call all my INVESTOR CONTACTS”
Islamic terror groups?
Goldbugs.
“Reds under every bed.”
Granted radical Islam isn’t the only purveyor of evil.
We would need to see a other evidence that Breivik had contact with Islamic terror groups or traveled to Pakistan or something.
But, several factors make me wonder if he was linked to Islamic terror groups:
1. Methodology of attack had a two-part Mumbai-like signature characteristic of AQ — Bombing followed by sniper attack.
2. Norway has a Islamic terror problem. Just last year a bombing plot was foiled. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10554523
3. Last week a Radical cleric in custody threaten to kill politicians. http://news.yahoo.com/norway-charges-radical-cleric-death-threats-125824880.html
4. Deception is a stratagem of war. Breivik lied to lure the kids near. Parts of the manifesto are lifted from other documents. Plagiarism is a form of lying. If part is lifted, we do not know these are his authentic ideas. The whole thing could be a diversion.
5. In the manifesto he speaks of “contacting investors.” Norwegian authorities say he could have had accomplices. These could be Muslim linked.
6. AQ has made recruiting “blond, blue eyed” westerners a priority. If they did, they would be expected to make an attack by such a terrorist look like it was inspired by the “right wing”to play into liberal media desire to find examples of “Christian” terrorists. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,328967,00.html
7. Breivik could be like Timothy McVeigh who has been linked to AQ. http://www.jaynadavis.com/highlights.html
8. He excuses the “minor sin” of sex with prostitutes because of the “grace” he will gain from being a martyr. That is an Islamic doctrine.
9. AQ has been training westerners at terror camps in Pakistan. The shootings seem to require professional military training. Where did he learn to shoot like that?
10. The scale of attacks and threats by Islamic terror groups is far greater than any other threat. More than 99 percent of attacks have been by Muslims. So, at first glance we have a 99 percent chance to suspect jihad here as well.
Good post which links into these statements where the police official immediately got jihad off the hook and stated categorically that he was a “right-wing” Christian Fundamentalist.
““We are not sure whether he was alone or had help,” a police official, Roger Andresen, said at a televised news conference.”
“He added, “What we know is that he is right-wing and a Christian fundamentalist.”
“Breivik has not been linked to any anti-jihadist groups, he added.”
This news conference by this police official was reported by the global media thus entombing these initial accusations as fact into the minds of people worldwide.
These statements have and continues to bother me.
The Times Square NYC attempted bomber also bothered me. He was employed by an affiliate of Apollo Management LP founders Leon Black and Joshua Harris. Apollo? Imagine that...anyway it’s been a while since I checked it out but it stunk and still stinks. I’ll see if I can find the file but my computer crashed...lost almost everything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.