Posted on 07/27/2011 9:07:20 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
Why are there white dots on the Obama birth certificate, and how did they get there?
These are questions asked by Tom Harrison, a software designer with more than 30 years experience in graphic design. Harrison – a 58 year-old Dartmouth graduate with a background in mathematics, physics and computer science – believes the dots prove the document is a forgery.
snip
"While many apologists have claimed the layering of the document is a natural outcome of optimized scanning, there is one thing that the scanning process cannot do, even if it is separating layers: it cannot create two separate colors for any given pixel," he said.
snip
"If the document were indeed scanned, there could not be varied green hues behind the white dots," Harrison insisted. "No scanner has X-ray vision. Nothing really complicated: No pixel can have two colors from a scanner."
snip
He further stressed that two colors on even one pixel in this document means at least two separate image layers, from different sources, were deliberately placed together.
In this case, it means, Harrison believes, that multiple images were assembled to create a document that did not exist as a genuine whole.
snip
His conclusion is that the document is a forgery.
In the end, Harrison summarized, "the assembly shows the one irrefutable hallmark of not being the result of a scan of a single original: multiple colors on the same spot, one hidden behind the other."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Why did he release the original forged pdf file, instead of first printing out a hardcopy, and doing a normal scan of that for release? I thought Obama was supposed to be the smartest guy in the room.
No doubt the usual distractions will be trotted out to rebut this, anything but dealing with the question of how two colors are occupying the same pixel on different layers of what is supposedly a simple scan of what Hawaii gave Obama's lawyers.
Just review the damn serial number. The top serif on the rightmost 1 digit is clearly distinct from the leftmost 1 digits regardless of scanning, sampling, and aliasing.
Anything released for public perusal will be digital. That invites all kinds of manipulation, whether purposely or inadvertently. The original copy signed by doctor at birth is what must come forth. Then whatever facts attend to the fellow’s birth in terms of parentage and residency need to be held up to the standard set forth in our Constituion WRT eligibility for POTUS.
Smoking gun number 3,235.
Now the question is, where WAS Obama born? Kenya? Indonesia? Maybe he is a Cold War-era Soviet Manchurian Candidate-type plant? And if he really never was a legitimate President, do the rules of Impeachment not apply to him?
I love the name of the local registrar in box #21 - U K L Lee!
IMO, they still apply. There is no reason why the well-established legal doctrine of "de facto officer" would not apply to the president as in the case of other government officials.
Under this doctrine, even though it is later discovered that a government official who holds color of official title to his office by virtue of a known election or appointment failed to meet a prerequisite of holding office, such as an eligibility requirement, nevertheless actions taken by him within the scope and by the apparent authority of that office will be considered valid and binding.
And IMO impeachment and conviction by Congress would likely be considered by the courts to be the exclusive method of both holding him accountable for the crimes of fraud and forgery and removing him from office.
The mystery of the registrar was solved, it’s V.K.L. Lee (Verna).
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2751301/posts
Everyone wants to be Buckhead
That’s all you got?
She does exist and she has been found by birthers doing the homework. So far, ONLY birthers have taken the trouble to vet barry bass turd. What we’ve found is, he’s a massive fraud.
One more round of floggings for this dead horse!!
Any frikken moron can see this thing was doctored.
This is F-R-A-U-D
.
.
.
.
It’s actually a V.
I too thought it was a U though.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2751301/posts
Lol. You don’t know who Buckhead is do you?
Good call there. How you liking our summer which finally arrived?
I know who Buckhead is. I just thought the Obots would have something more to offer in defense of the birth certificate in light of this latest point than just a snarky comment.
it’s known to be a forgery. it’s been proven numerous ways by numerous experts in various fields.
they just don’t care.
the Constitution is irrelevant.
your belief that the founding document must be upheld, is considered quaint
the main reason... there is nothing you can do about it. they will not pursue it. they will not fulfill their obligations. they will not uphold even the most basic of laws, unless it suits their purpose
don’t believe me? try calling your congress critter. tell them you have proof of document forgery and identity theft and would they do anything about it. you could ask whether you should call the local police. they will humor you, ask for your address, and file it in a big bit bucket.
the corruption is systemic
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.