Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Utoya Is Liberal Utopia
WorldNetDaily ^ | July 24, 2011 | Andrew Longman

Posted on 07/28/2011 3:22:08 AM PDT by FarRockaway

In Norway, the right to possess a firearm is not protected by constitution or even law.

Anyone who wishes to purchase a firearm must obtain a license from the government and then prove to the government some "genuine reason to possess." You must not only sound convincing that you will use the weapon for hunting, target shooting, collecting, personal protection, etc., but then the category of gun you wish to purchase must fall in the officially recognized government uses. Criminal and mental background checks apply, a firearm safety course is mandated and any acquisition, possession and transfer must be registered with the government.

And still, some guy walked into a "gun-free zone," just like last time, and...

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: breivik; norway; utoya
Why is it that the more liberalism causes awful results, the more liberals want more liberalism to combat the awful results?
1 posted on 07/28/2011 3:22:19 AM PDT by FarRockaway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FarRockaway
Anyone can visit the endpoint of Leftist/Labor Union government with a trip to Detroit.
2 posted on 07/28/2011 3:28:02 AM PDT by Jacquerie (The Journolist Media. Sword and Shield of the democrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FarRockaway

Their system is geared so that a person who has shown mental issues and is considered unstable...will not be able to own or buy a weapon. That part of the law might be supported by most people in the US, and most gun-owners. Course, in this case...the Oslo shooter was just a “normal” guy before the shooting and he would not have been denied ownership. Even now, it’s going to be difficult to judge him insane by their standards of the law. He kinda falls into the McVeigh/Unabomber/Charles Manson category.


3 posted on 07/28/2011 3:36:25 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

“Even now, it’s going to be difficult to judge him insane by their standards of the law.”

Yea, some of us do wonder whether a person who opposes an insane government is insane himself. For example, had he done EXACTLY the same thing in Nazi German or Stalinist Russia, would we have the same problem with him?

And so what constitutes insanity on the part of a government? One could make a strong argument that instituting policies clearly designed to turn your country into an Islamic dictatorship is insane...couldn’t one?


4 posted on 07/28/2011 3:57:20 AM PDT by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

There are going to be failures (shootings) even if government adopts some sort of heightened “sanity standards” for possessing a firearm. An otherwise normal person can become unstable years later. It would require a very active bureaucracy (police state) to chase down every gun owner who ever visited a therapist.


5 posted on 07/28/2011 4:02:06 AM PDT by Tallguy (You can safely ignore anything that precedes the word "But"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FarRockaway

The motive behind leftism is religious belief, with humanity in the role of the Author of the universe. Isn’t this a logical, if unstated, conclusion from the precept that reality is socially constructed? The evils of the world always result from ideas that oppose leftist ideology, and to correct the evils, the world must be brought closer to correct morality.

Why do people on the left never come out and say this? They assiduously avoid religious language and the trappings of religion. They reject Christianity and traditional Judaism. But they lack the self-awareness to see that they have just substituted another religion for the one they abandoned.


6 posted on 07/28/2011 4:23:01 AM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FarRockaway
Why is it that the more liberalism causes awful results, the more liberals want more liberalism to combat the awful results?

Because liberalism is the enemy of personal freedom disguised as "good intentions" which serve only to consistently prove the Law of Unintended Consequences.

7 posted on 07/28/2011 4:52:25 AM PDT by immadashell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FarRockaway

Utopia?

It is Utopia lost.

Forever more the place and the conference will be viewed with fear and dread. No longer is there the freedom to destroy society with cockamamie leftist balderdash


8 posted on 07/28/2011 4:56:44 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ....Flash mobs are trickle down leftwing REDISTRIBUTION))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FarRockaway
utoya
9 posted on 07/28/2011 5:04:26 AM PDT by BinaryBoy (Stuck with a local RINO? Regardless of who you vote for, donate $$$ to a different district.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FarRockaway

Is Utoya one of the Jackson’s ????


10 posted on 07/28/2011 5:20:23 AM PDT by lionheart 247365 (-:{ GLENN BECK is 0bama's TRANSPARENCY CZAR }:-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL
For example, had he done EXACTLY the same thing in Nazi German or Stalinist Russia, would we have the same problem with him?

I would. He stalked and shot teenagers in a summer camp. It doesn't matter if it had been a nazi summer camp or a stalinist summer camp. There is no way it can be justified as a legitimate target.

Historically there have been many times that people should have taken up arms against their government but didn't. We live in a country that was born of people taking up arms and fighting against tyranny when they felt that they had no choice. There has to be line that the people will not let the government cross, but even if that day comes, it does not justify shooting up a summer camp.

11 posted on 07/28/2011 5:21:08 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BobL
And so what constitutes insanity on the part of a government?

Does any sane person really want his sanity, for the purposes of exercising all of his God given rights as a free citizen, to be subject to the 'objective' determination of a fascist, baby-killing diesel dyke like Janet Reno, or Janet Napolitano, or a racist thug like Ricky Holder? If you answer 'yes' please report to the nearest public rubber room for further evaluation.

One way to reduce the potential for gov't abuse of such power would be to place the burden of a M'Naghten style proof on the government in any such case. Let the government be required to prove to a court that old Tom absolutely positively believes Schmucky Chucky Shumer is a truth saying, God fearing Real American Patriot, before they can deprive old Tom of his rights.

12 posted on 07/28/2011 5:24:33 AM PDT by Bedford Forrest (Roger, Contact, Judy, Out. Fox One. Splash one.<I>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FarRockaway

More proof gun control doesn’t work


13 posted on 07/28/2011 5:41:37 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

This is why more regular folks should be armed. Then, if some crazy does start something, he will not cause as much harm as he would have been able to do in a crowd of unarmed people.

Even if you keep crazies from getting a gun, they can have a knife or make a bomb. There will always be these violent incidents, but as I said, the best protection against them is a citizenry that is capable of defending itself rather than waiting an hour and a half for the police to show up.


14 posted on 07/28/2011 5:46:53 AM PDT by Pining_4_TX ( The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FarRockaway
Why is it that the more liberalism causes awful results, the more liberals want more liberalism to combat the awful results?

Because they crave power -- power over you, me and everybody else. Whether it causes "awful results" or not is a matter of complete indifference to them.

15 posted on 07/28/2011 5:51:32 AM PDT by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Rempublicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

I think you pose good questions.
I don’t think anything justifies deliberately killing teenagers & young adults.
However, I can perfectly understand your point, which in parts suggests that there are double standards. And, there are. Both for ‘criminal behavior/actions’ as well as ‘insanity’ & how they may be defined, by different people or grps, to serve a purpose.


16 posted on 07/28/2011 5:57:26 AM PDT by odds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FarRockaway
Why is it that the more liberalism causes awful results, the more liberals want more liberalism to combat the awful results?

Because liberals are really smart (just ask them, they'll tell you!), so if their ideas don't work, it's because the ideas weren't tried hard enough.
17 posted on 07/28/2011 6:05:22 AM PDT by Cheburashka (If found, please return this Ring of Power to Sauron, Lord of Darkness. Return postage guaranteed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL
Yea, some of us do wonder whether a person who opposes an insane government is insane himself. For example, had he done EXACTLY the same thing in Nazi German or Stalinist Russia, would we have the same problem with him?

A good point, but most of us at Free Republic would still have a problem with his actions even if he were in Nazi Germany or Stalinist Russia.

1) A car bomb does not only kill evil bureaucrats, so it is hardly a weapon of choice. Something more finely targeted is preferable.

2) Children are innocents, even if someday they will become part of the ruling class, so mass murder at a Hitlerjugend or Young Pioneer camp is not something we would support.

3) Once having taken the path of mass murder, one does not set one’s gun down just because the cops show up. One continues to the bitter end. If you actually believe your beliefs you carry out them even to your own death.

18 posted on 07/28/2011 6:19:46 AM PDT by Cheburashka (If found, please return this Ring of Power to Sauron, Lord of Darkness. Return postage guaranteed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FarRockaway

Are you describing the gun laws in Norway. . .?

It looks easier to get a gun in Norway than New York State.


19 posted on 07/28/2011 6:57:25 AM PDT by Macoozie (Go Sarah! Palin/Bolton 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheburashka

“A good point, but most of us at Free Republic would still have a problem with his actions even if he were in Nazi Germany or Stalinist Russia.”

Thanks...the first response was rather harsh, yours and the others are a bit easier on me.

As more and more people get jailed in Europe for simply trying to keep their home countries looking at least somewhat like they’ve looked for the past 1000 years, more people are going to pop and take actions against against the ruling power structure.

...but the people at that training camp were not (yet) in that power structure and it’s very possible that some may have even been turned off after having to chant for the destruction of Israel...and thus would have never joined that power structure. I agree - there is no way to justify armed action against people who are NOT oppressing you.


20 posted on 07/28/2011 5:37:36 PM PDT by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

Very well said


21 posted on 07/29/2011 1:27:16 AM PDT by FarRockaway (despotic gerrymander: the aspiration of dhimmicrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: immadashell

Whew! Well said.


22 posted on 07/29/2011 1:28:07 AM PDT by FarRockaway (despotic gerrymander: the aspiration of dhimmicrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Durus

Correct on the universal immorality of snipering children in a terrorist act for some political motive.


23 posted on 07/29/2011 1:30:03 AM PDT by FarRockaway (despotic gerrymander: the aspiration of dhimmicrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson