Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Forbes family's big deal causes big trouble (long)
Fortune (Via CNN.com) ^ | July 28, 2011 | Katie Benner

Posted on 07/28/2011 6:08:40 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine

The Forbes family has poked itself in the eye with its "capitalist tool."

(snip) But according to nonpublic documents made available to Fortune, the company has been under more financial strain than previously believed. Forbes Media violated covenants on a revolving credit line that it took out in 2006, according to a letter sent to the company by J.P. Morgan. The loan, which was part of a series of transactions that allowed the Forbes family to cash out more than $100 million from the company, is due next July. Some lenders have been selling pieces of it at a discount from face value.

(snip) The Forbes family .... is running out of trophies to sell.

(Excerpt) Read more at finance.fortune.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bankruptcy; business; forbes; richestorags
Forbes is one of the better financial publications out there, and Steve Forbes has achieved fame as its head, even contemplating a presidential run at one point. But, the Forbes empire isn't as profitable as it was when Malcolm built and run it. The family has been selling off one trophy property after another, putting the empire under considerable strain.

I thought this was interesting, because the US is, or was, a place where there's social mobility, both upward and downward. As they say, "shirtsleeves to shirtsleeves in three generations." This might not happen to the Forbes, but the ebbs and flows of the rich are interesting in these times when our Dear Leader acts as if being rich is a permanent state that can be milked regularly for redistribution.

1 posted on 07/28/2011 6:08:53 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
Fortune slamming its competitor...cheap hit peice

The family did well..they took out $250 mill when they sold a piece to Elevation Partners..They also got lots of cash..when they sold off all of ole Malcolm's toys...and maybe they sold at the top of the market...they kept the internet business..and they borrowed..that's called using OTHER PEOPLE's MONEY..rtaher than their own...the family is doing fine....they'll ride out the downturn

OTOH..let's look at Time.....Fortune's parent comany...or rather, let's not..because there ain't anything good to say about it..

2 posted on 07/28/2011 6:38:46 AM PDT by ken5050 (Save the earth..it's the ONLY planet with CHOCOLATE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

most wealthy families destroy their inherited businesses or sell them.

very few are willing to accept the rigors of competition because their personalities are the opposite of the patriarch who built the business.

the orange county register imploded and destroyed a libertarian-conservative media.

the family didn’t want to run the company and sold it to a management co that hired socialists to write dribble.


3 posted on 07/28/2011 8:05:11 AM PDT by ken21 (liberal + rino progressive media hate palin, bachman, cain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Fortune slamming its competitor...cheap hit (sic) peice

The family did well....the family is doing fine....they'll ride out the downturn

OTOH..let's look at Time.....Fortune's parent comany...or rather, let's not..

I missed the inter-publication rivalry angle, LOL. Clearly the Forbes empire was huge, and some of it has been cashed out and redistributed. As you point out, the article is incomplete about whether it's been dissipated as well as redistributed. Since the Forbes fortune was built around publishing, it's a short step for the reader to confuse diversification with dissipation.

4 posted on 07/28/2011 8:23:33 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Forbes has taken a hit, as have all magazines. I still subscribe..today each issue is paper thin..15 years ago..300 page issues were common with 200 pages of advertising..those days are gone....and soon will be Time


5 posted on 07/28/2011 8:55:04 AM PDT by ken5050 (Save the earth..it's the ONLY planet with CHOCOLATE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson