Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hold In Global Warming Alarmism
Forbes/Yahoo ^ | July 27, 2011 | James Taylor

Posted on 07/28/2011 7:20:33 AM PDT by driftdiver

NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth's atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.

Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA's Aqua satellite, reports that real-world data from NASA's Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into alarmist computer models.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: globalwarming; gore; gorebullwarming; nasa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: driftdiver
Wow!

NASA better be careful or they might have funding cuts that end the shuttle program and massive lay-offs.

Al Gore = putting the CON in consensus.

Enough of this "Space stuff" let's build choo-choos and windmills and electric cars and solar panels and batteries.

21 posted on 07/28/2011 7:58:32 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Obama and the Dems - The flash mob raiding the Treasury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

The truth always comes out..


22 posted on 07/28/2011 7:59:22 AM PDT by TinCan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

So more heat is escaping from the earth’s atmoshere than AlGore’s models predicted? I guess now we know why the other planets are all warming up, time to spend trillions on this new crisis!


23 posted on 07/28/2011 8:06:06 AM PDT by Newtoidaho (Fight organized crime. Vote out all incumbent Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Al gore’s response: “the nasa study shows heat escaping so it is clear we are creating heat on a globally unsustainable level, if we are accelerating the rate that heat is escaping, if the temperature doesn’t rise, we will have more extreme weather. floods, more snowfall, droughts, and extreme temperatures. in short, we are doomed, buy carbon credits and my hedge fund.”


24 posted on 07/28/2011 8:06:55 AM PDT by rokkitapps ( Hearings on healthcare waivers NOW! (If you agree make this your tagline))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

The only gas that reflects IR energy really well is water vapor, not CO2. Heck, even argon is much better as a supposed greenhouse gas than CO2 and there’s more than twice the amount of it in the atmosphere than CO2.


25 posted on 07/28/2011 8:17:12 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

And yet, I was in line to mail a package yesterday, commenting on how nice the weather had been that morning, and the woman ( a stranger) I was talking to got all conspiratorial and said, “Yes, something very strange is going on!” I swear, people now think NICE weather is a sign that the earth is in crisis!


26 posted on 07/28/2011 8:20:56 AM PDT by brytlea (Someone the other day said I'm not a nice person. How did they know?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rokkitapps

it’s because the Earth’s core is like a million degrees or something. Algore said so.


27 posted on 07/28/2011 8:24:41 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

It wasn’t possible to have “greenhouse gas” before greenhouses were invented, therefore greenhouses must be the problem.


28 posted on 07/28/2011 8:27:40 AM PDT by lewislynn ( What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in commom? Misinformation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Pay back is hell when screw with NASA’s flight program.


29 posted on 07/28/2011 8:28:22 AM PDT by RetSignman (It's Summertime...the "Goebbles Warmers" are back from hibernation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
When objective NASA satellite data, reported in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, show a "huge discrepancy" between alarmist climate models and real-world facts, climate scientists, the media and our elected officials would be wise to take notice. Whether or not they do so will tell us a great deal about how honest the purveyors of global warming alarmism truly are.

>Houston..... we've got a problem

30 posted on 07/28/2011 8:34:13 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." Richard Feynman father of Quantum Physics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver


31 posted on 07/28/2011 8:44:51 AM PDT by Iron Munro (The more effeminate & debauched the people, the more they are fitted for a tyrannical government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB
"the earth has a fever" ..
32 posted on 07/28/2011 9:12:23 AM PDT by rokkitapps ( Hearings on healthcare waivers NOW! (If you agree make this your tagline))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

“In addition to finding that far less heat is being trapped than alarmist computer models have predicted, the NASA satellite data show the atmosphere begins shedding heat into space long before United Nations computer models predicted.”

As a young scientist I attended a seminar given by someone modelling a biocatalyic reaction. After the talk a co-worker I didn’t really know asked me what I thought. I told him that modelling such reactions wasn’t worth a bucket of spit and that it would just be easier to actually DO the experiment. He got a strange look on his face and walked away. Found out later he modeled biological reactions.

In any case good scientists have a motto, “when real data disagrees with your model, you need a new model”.


33 posted on 07/28/2011 9:14:01 AM PDT by Hacklehead (The Tree of Liberty is very thirsty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

No way! You mean this state we’ve been in for the last 10,000 years is a stable equilibrium? One in which the restorative forces increase faster than the perturbative forces when it is stressed? One that has survived volcanoes, sunspots, massive deforestation, and who knows what else? I call bullshit! The conservatives are obviously guilty, and therefore there must be something they are guilty of, something big. Climate change that is going to destroy all the climates in the solar system is the only thing big enough to fit that bill. Kill all conservatives! Global warming! Increase the debt ceiling!


34 posted on 07/28/2011 9:15:25 AM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Global Warming is so ‘00s. The politically correct term is “climate disruption.”


35 posted on 07/28/2011 9:23:24 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetSignman
Pay back is hell when screw with NASA’s flight program.

From the 11-year study period, it appears that they had adequate data to release this information last year. Someone held it back so it could be used as a "parting shot".

36 posted on 07/28/2011 9:25:28 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Wherever did you get the idea that Argon is a greenhouse gas? It isn’t — and neither is oxygen or nitrogen.


37 posted on 07/28/2011 9:36:53 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve

Yes, you are correct! There can be no natural equilibrium! Good post, and so true. You made me laugh.


38 posted on 07/28/2011 9:37:55 AM PDT by greatplains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead

“good scientists have a motto, “when real data disagrees with your model, you need a new model””

Several years back I took a class in forest growth modeling. The instructor, a top modeler for the USFS, opened the class with the statement, “All models are wrong. Some are useful.” It’s the only thing I remember from the class....


39 posted on 07/28/2011 9:43:01 AM PDT by Old Forester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Maybe this new study is NASA’s way of saying “thanks” to Obama for his cuts to their budget - the money train was gone so now they can tell the truth about the global warming bs?


40 posted on 07/28/2011 9:50:13 AM PDT by Nevadan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson