Skip to comments.The birth certificate please! Subpoena to be delivered
Posted on 07/29/2011 7:33:04 AM PDT by RobinMasters
Attorney, doc experts to show up at Hawaii Department of Health with court document
Computer scanning expert Doug Vogt and typesetting expert Paul Irey say they will accompany attorney Orly Taitz when she presents to the Hawaii Department of Health a subpoena that should allow her to examine Barack Obama's original 1961 typewritten birth certificate.
Vogt and Irey both told WND they are making travel plans to join Taitz in Honolulu when she goes to the state agency at 10 a.m. on Monday, Aug. 8, to present the subpoena in person.
"We will plan to hold a press conference late in the day of Aug. 8," Vogt said, "and if the document we see varies from the birth certificate documents the White House released, we plan to file criminal charges in Hawaii immediately."
Get the New York Times best-seller "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to be President," by Jerome Corsi.
Vogt shared with WND a copy of a letter he has written to Hawaii Attorney General David Louie, putting Louie on notice regarding the reasons he believes the birth certificate released by the White House is fraudulent.
WND previously reported on Vogt's decision to file a 22-page criminal complaint with the FBI.
Irey says it won't take long to evaluate the original birth record, if it exists.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
So what happens if the original doesn’t exist?
I wish this would go somewhere. But I fear it won’t.
As I will forget about it by Aug 8th, me hopes someone will keep us abreast.
Wonder what will happen when it is refused...by what authority is the subpoena?
What is wrong with exposing this? This phony document would really expose Obama considering the coverage it has during the Trump days.
Taitz finally found an honest judge in the Federal court system. There may be others but Lamberth is as straight-arrow as they come. And the subpoena looks legit.
They will be turned away and not allowed to view squat.
I don’t care if the subpoena came from SCOTUS itself...
Obama can simply claim executive privilege.
Obama has made it clear that even the constitution is irrelevant, and has already ignored federal court rulings and orders.... but nobody does anything about it.
“As displayed on her website, the July 5 subpoena granted Taitz by the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii allows her to examine the original 1961 Obama birth certificate on Aug. 8 at 10 a.m.:”
“Taitz said the judge’s ruling moved the case into the discovery phase, in which she can issue subpoenas to those holding documentation she is seeking.”
Is she correct?
Actually, not really.
Since Obama has already released his birth certificate he can’t claim privacy rights or executive privilege for something that is already public.
Actually, not really.
Since Obama has already released his birth certificate he can’t claim privacy rights or executive privilege for something that is already public. That was the argument made to Lamberth!!!!!
“We want to see the birth certificate.”
I understand Gitmo is still open.
“and if the document we see
“IF”.... the key word as I doubt they will see any documents being in the possession of the State.
Why did they announce they will accompany Orly? HDOH will now find a reason to waste their travel expenses and say ha ha.
Never tell the enemy your plans.
IF they’re allowed to see anything, HI will trot out either Fraud COLB I or Fraud COLB II, and Big Media will do the Nelson dance (Ha Ha).
A MUCH newsier and more relate-worthy endeavor is the pursuit of Obama's full, complete, and unexpurgated collegiate transcripts.
We must insist that all GOP candidates voluntarily show their transcripts; and,
...that THEY demand the same of Mister Obama (who it would seem is hiding something pretty big.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.