Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
Tea Partyers shouldn't lament that their preferred Cut, Cap, Balance approach, which passed the House, is impossible to get enacted into law in 2011; rather, they should take pride in realizing that because of their movement, real spending reform is indeed politically possible — just not this year.

I call baloney. Pubbies have to pass exactly -- nothing -- and Jug Ears and his politburo out of necessity will HAVE to cut spending. I don't think there's any way the idiot in the white hut will make good on his bluff of NOT paying SS, Medicare, etc. Unlike general funds, these are "trust" accounts, and as such the gubmint is held to a higher standard in their capacity as fiduciary. Have I missed something?

16 posted on 07/29/2011 10:28:25 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (You have only two choices: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ForGod'sSake

I think you have missed something. Like it or not, we need independents to vote for our candidates for President, Senate and Representatives next year. If Obama successfully pins the lack of an agreement and it’s results on the tea party and the independents bite on it, we lose everything. Here is the real issue, the Supreme Court. I want Obama out so that the next vacancies are not filled by another Kagan or Sotomayor. We lose the court, all these crucial votes coming up on Obamacare and all the other crap he is pushing become law.


19 posted on 07/30/2011 9:20:08 AM PDT by fatez ("If you're going through Hell, keep going." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson