Skip to comments.
Raise Taxes on the Rich?
August 1, 2011
| Vanity
Posted on 08/01/2011 6:46:11 PM PDT by yetidog
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-140 next last
1
posted on
08/01/2011 6:46:16 PM PDT
by
yetidog
To: yetidog
How’ve you lasted on here so long?
2
posted on
08/01/2011 6:49:37 PM PDT
by
mgstarr
("Some of us drink because we're not poets." Arthur (1981))
To: yetidog
3
posted on
08/01/2011 6:49:48 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(Gore Lauds Romney on Climate Position; 0bamaCare was based on RomneyCare.)
To: yetidog
4
posted on
08/01/2011 6:50:38 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
To: yetidog
The more money you give gummint, the more it will spend. Our survival requires starving this beast.
5
posted on
08/01/2011 6:50:43 PM PDT
by
freespirited
(Stupid people are ruining America. --Herman Cain)
To: yetidog
Now I agree that $250,000 is not the place to start, but maybe 5 million (or some other negotiable figure and...This would be acceptable to you unless you were to get into the 5 million or level?
6
posted on
08/01/2011 6:50:48 PM PDT
by
TribalPrincess2U
(The democRATS—just doing the groundwork for al Qaeda?)
To: yetidog
7
posted on
08/01/2011 6:51:04 PM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: yetidog
Forgive me for asking
but what is so wrong about raising taxes to some negotiated extent on the most wealthy taxpayers in the US?The problem with the income tax is that it doesn't tax existing wealth, only the creation of new wealth. As such, it serves as a barrier to entry to the upper classes of American society for those Americans who elect to climb the social ladder through hard, honest work.
8
posted on
08/01/2011 6:51:54 PM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
(Live Free or Die)
To: yetidog
HEY YETI!
It ain’t YOUR money!
9
posted on
08/01/2011 6:52:32 PM PDT
by
Repeal The 17th
(Proud to be a (small) monthly donor.)
To: yetidog
Why should we? They already pay the lion’s share.
Besides, we could confiscate every dime that they make, along with everything they own and it wouldn’t make a dent in the spending that the left has committed us to.
10
posted on
08/01/2011 6:52:36 PM PDT
by
rockrr
(Everything is different now...)
To: yetidog
How about this. EVERYONE is taxed at 20% of their income, regardless. No deductions. How is that not fair if everyone is treated equally?
11
posted on
08/01/2011 6:53:07 PM PDT
by
mgstarr
("Some of us drink because we're not poets." Arthur (1981))
To: yetidog
I’m an “old school” American. How much money someone has is none of my or the government’s damn business. If “the poor” want a BIG government, then THEY should be willing to pay for it. Thou shalt not covet.
12
posted on
08/01/2011 6:53:09 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Americans need to wean their government off of its dependence on foreign money.)
To: yetidog
13
posted on
08/01/2011 6:53:30 PM PDT
by
WackySam
(Obama got Osama just like Nixon landed on the moon.)
To: yetidog; stephenjohnbanker
Forgive me for asking
but what is so wrong about raising taxes to some negotiated extent on the most wealthy taxpayers in the US?That was already tried - it's called the Alternative Minimum Tax. Unfortunately for Americans, this tax now hits middle-class Americans the hardest, especially those in areas with high costs of living. Truly wealthy Americans are still free to exploit other sections of the Federal tax code to shelter their wealth (new or existing) from taxation.
To: yetidog
I'm not hear to defend the rich but I think the top ten percent in terms of wealth paying 70% of all federal taxes collected is enough.
Maybe you should be asking why do 48% pay no federal taxes whatsoever.
15
posted on
08/01/2011 6:55:01 PM PDT
by
skeeter
To: yetidog
"what is so wrong about raising taxes to some negotiated extent on the most wealthy taxpayers" Why don't you try to take it out of my pocket yourself and find out, punk?
|
|
|
To: yetidog
Forgive me for asking
but what is so wrong about raising taxes to some negotiated extent on the most wealthy taxpayers in the US? [snip] This is not a matter of class envy nor income distribution, rather it addresses about the only rational argument that liberals still have in the ongoing fiscal policy debate. For one, taxing a group of people simply to score political points is about as immoral as it gets. That's what Democrats do, and that's why we stand against those actions.
To: mgstarr
Flat tax solves all of this class warfare BS.
18
posted on
08/01/2011 6:56:10 PM PDT
by
comebacknewt
((on second thought, never mind, go away again Newt))
To: rabscuttle385
Yeah, and you’ll never get a wealth tax that would raise real money because the true rich will never stand for it.
19
posted on
08/01/2011 6:57:18 PM PDT
by
GourmetDan
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
To: yetidog
Taxing the rich won’t solve the problem either in the near term or long term. The rich aren’t responsible for creating this mess. I’m not rich by any stretch of the imagination, I”m near the bottom of the middle class. But, let’s get real here. The rich aren’t responsible for this mess, neither are the middle class, or the seniors or our veterans. Yet, all of these classes of individuals will get punished by Washington because Washingont couldn’t reign in the excess spending and debts they have incurred on current and future generations. It’s Washington’s hope that we’re all poor and that there are only two classes of people: The rich in Washington and then all the rest of us.
20
posted on
08/01/2011 6:57:31 PM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(You have entered an invalid birthday)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-140 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson