Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Paul Introduces Bill to Cancel $1.6 T in Debt Held By Federal Reserve
The Hill's Fllor Action Blog ^ | 08/02/2011 | Pete Kasperowicz

Posted on 08/03/2011 1:18:07 PM PDT by ex-Texan

Rep. Ron Paul on Monday introduced legislation that would lower the federal government's debt by canceling the roughly $1.6 trillion in debt held by the Federal Reserve.

Paul has argued for the last few weeks that the idea represents a quick way to make the growing fiscal crisis more manageable. Under his bill, H.R. 2768, the $1.6 trillion that the Treasury owes to the Federal Reserve would disappear.

The Federal Reserve began buying Treasury bonds in earnest late last year as part of its effort to keep long-term interest rates down. But Paul has argued that Fed purchases of Treasury debt represent a debt that the government owes to itself, and one that also leads to an unwanted and inflationary increase in the money supply.

Paul has also said the Fed is allowing the federal government to continue a spending binge it otherwise would not be able to afford, and is forcing the Fed to print money to keep up.

"If the federal government cannot cut spending and bring the budget back into balance, the Fed undoubtedly will be forced to simply monetize trillions of dollars in Treasury debt, which is nothing more than a stealth form of default," Paul said back in May.

Paul is highly critical of the debt-ceiling agreement that the House approved Monday, and said that rather than require real cuts in spending, the bill mostly cuts planned spending levels in the future. According to the legislation, discretionary spending in 2012 would be just $7 billion less than in 2011, and in 2013 it would be just $3 billion less than 2011 before allowing increases above 2011 levels.

"No plan under serious consideration cuts spending in the way you and I think about it," Paul wrote in a piece that appeared on The Hill's Congress Blog. "Instead, the 'cuts' being discussed are illusory, and are not cuts from current amounts being spent, but cuts in projected spending increases."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: bernanke; fed; federalreserve; obama; palin; paul; ronpaul; trillion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
Please hit the primary link to read all the comments posted below the article.

Paul is highly critical of the debt-ceiling agreement that the House approved Monday, and said that rather than require real cuts in spending, the bill mostly cuts planned spending levels in the future. According to the legislation, discretionary spending in 2012 would be just $7 billion less than in 2011, and in 2013 it would be just $3 billion less than 2011 before allowing increases above 2011 levels.

"No plan under serious consideration cuts spending in the way you and I think about it," Paul wrote in a piece that appeared on The Hill's Congress Blog. "Instead, the 'cuts' being discussed are illusory, and are not cuts from current amounts being spent, but cuts in projected spending increases."


1 posted on 08/03/2011 1:18:18 PM PDT by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

How about the $9 Trillion that the Fed can’t account for?


2 posted on 08/03/2011 1:23:05 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Isn’t that esentially debt we owe to ourselves?

It doesn’t make whole lot of sense to keep paying it.


3 posted on 08/03/2011 1:23:30 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

That would balance the budget for this year but what about next year?


4 posted on 08/03/2011 1:23:41 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Meanwhile, CNN is running, as we speak, with a banner Headline Stating:

Debt Deal could force $700B in cuts over 10 years” , like it is DRASTIC, HORRIBLE NEWS...

We live on Orwell Bizarro Planet now, don’t we.


5 posted on 08/03/2011 1:24:05 PM PDT by tcrlaf (PREFRONTAL LOBOTOMISTS FOR OBAMA2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

It would be better to just delete the Federals Reserve...................


6 posted on 08/03/2011 1:24:48 PM PDT by Red Badger ("Treason doth never prosper.... What's the reason? Why if it prosper, none dare call it treason.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

When I was a kid I worked on Ron Paul’s early campaign. I remember driving him over to an event one time. At a skating rink of all places:) He was saying the exact same things then as he is today. He really has never changed his tune(s).


7 posted on 08/03/2011 1:26:25 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (Sharia? No thanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Paul has argued for the last few weeks that the idea represents a quick way to make the growing fiscal crisis more manageable. Under his bill, H.R. 2768, the $1.6 trillion that the Treasury owes to the Federal Reserve would disappear.

What consequences would arise from doing this? After reading the original article and the comments, I still have no idea.
8 posted on 08/03/2011 1:26:36 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7; mlocher; Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!; TruthConquers; M. Espinola; Cincinatus' Wife; ...
Notice that nobody is talks about $ 16 Trillion the Fed sent to central banks in other countries and lent to the banking cartel players around the world.

Such a vast transaction probably violates multiple conflicts of interest regulations and may, in fact, constitute illegal money laundering.

Does anybody even know how many box cars of $ 100 bills it would take to move that much currency or how much all the bill would weigh ___ ?

Thank God the Fed is using imaginary numbers and computer transactions and one and zeros of digital money . . . LOL !

9 posted on 08/03/2011 1:29:15 PM PDT by ex-Texan (Ecclesiastes 5:10 - 20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Isn’t that esentially debt we owe to ourselves?

It represents money that we printed. Getting rid of it just clears the way to print more.

ML/NJ

10 posted on 08/03/2011 1:32:34 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Isn’t that esentially debt we owe to ourselves?

Well, yes, but when you specify the definitions of we and ourselves in context it becomes more clear.

we owe = wage slave tax payers OWE

to ourselves = to the banking cabal that rules the money supply

The corrected version reads, "Isn't that essentially debt we tax payers owe to our banking cabal overlords?"

11 posted on 08/03/2011 1:36:56 PM PDT by douginthearmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
What consequences would arise from doing this?

We wouldn't have to pay interest on a loan that the Federal Reserve essentially bought back.

As far as the 1.6 trillion 'disappearing', all the principal is just numbers on a piece of paper. It is the INTEREST which involves REAL MONEY, and which somebody MUST PAY.

Ron Paul is correct. We are paying for something that we should not be.

Where do you think all these Superyachts and World's Tallest Buildings come from?

12 posted on 08/03/2011 1:37:05 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

-——But Paul has argued that Fed purchases of Treasury debt represent a debt that the government owes to itself,-——

Which raises the question, if the Treasury ceased making interest payments would the fed sue?


13 posted on 08/03/2011 1:37:19 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ....Flash mobs are trickle down leftwing REDISTRIBUTION))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
He really has never changed his tune(s).

When the "tune" is reality, what's to change?

14 posted on 08/03/2011 1:38:00 PM PDT by Misterioso (The worst law is better than bureaucratic tyranny. (Ludwig von Mises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek; Red Badger; tcrlaf; cripplecreek; GeronL; RC2

"Whoopie . . . Free imaginary $ Trillions . . . All owed by the taxpayers . . ."

15 posted on 08/03/2011 1:38:03 PM PDT by ex-Texan (Ecclesiastes 5:10 - 20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

AFAIK, the $16T was paid back.

If I loan out $1 a hundred times, and it’s paid back in short order every time, I’ve loaned out $100 - and it’s no big deal. Seems that’s what the Fed is doing, just on a larger scale (repeated loans, all paid back).


16 posted on 08/03/2011 1:41:00 PM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

This could be an elegant stealth method to get rid of the Fed. I like it


17 posted on 08/03/2011 1:41:16 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Somewhere in Kenya, a village is missing an idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2
How about the $9 Trillion that the Fed can’t account for?

The Federal Reserve (a non-government organization) can account for every penny. They do no have to give an 'accounting' to us, or the government, as they are the bankers, the loan originator.

It is our government that says they can't account for the money, and blames the Federal Reserve. There is even talk of 'auditing' the Federal Reserve. What a joke. There is about as much chance of that as you getting to sit in on all of the Obama meetings at the White House and Golf Course.

18 posted on 08/03/2011 1:41:31 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

The Federal Reserve Corporation is a private bank.


19 posted on 08/03/2011 1:41:41 PM PDT by FightThePower! (Fight the powers that be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FightThePower!
The Federal Reserve Corporation is a private bank.

The fed is private when its convenient.
20 posted on 08/03/2011 1:42:58 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson