Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man Charged After Firing Warning Shot
KCCI ^ | 8/3/11

Posted on 08/04/2011 1:19:51 PM PDT by LibWhacker

MARSHALLTOWN, Iowa -- A Marshalltown homeowner faces felony charges after shooting at a trespasser Sunday afternoon.

Officials said the trespasser has been charged with a misdemeanor.

Clayton Jensen told officials he had just come home from running an errand when he looked out his back window and saw a man in his backyard. Jensen said he was concerned for his family's safety.

"He was kind of heightened alert because one of his family members had seen someone outside the house at night and then they took off when they were confronted," said Brian Batterson, Marshalltown assistant police chief.

Several homeowners said they're concerned about what's happening in their neighborhood.

A neighbor told KCCI that someone had entered a house nearby recently while the resident was sleeping and stole some items.

But Marshalltown police said that doesn't justify Jensen's decision to fire a gun.

Police said 18-year-old Abelardo Gonzalez didn't deny looking under a tarp where Jensen was storing bikes and a lawn mower. He told officers he was on his way home and just cutting through Jensen's fenced-in backyard.

"Mr. Jensen was OK to follow this gentleman and confront this gentleman, but once he fired a weapon he crossed the line," said Batterson.

Jensen told police he followed Gonzalez and fired a warning shot at the ground near a tree when Gonzalez turned and made a gesture he took as a threat.

"He was armed. He knew Mr. Gonzalez was unarmed. He should have just left the scene if he felt he was threatened and waited for police to arrive," said Batterson.

Neighbors have mixed feelings about Jensen's actions and the fact he's now facing a felony charge, while Gonzalez is charged with a simple misdemeanor.

"When I came out I seen him pointing the gun at his head," said Ken Picard. "He should have called the cops and leave the officials to do the work."

"I think the emphasis should be on the individual who was on the private property, disturbing his property," said Fred Meyer.

Gonzalez was not injured in the incident. Jensen told police he never intended to harm or shoot Gonzalez.

Jensen recently moved his family to Marshalltown after retiring from the Army.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: banglist; charged; firing; shot; warning
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: LibWhacker
“He should have just left the scene if he felt he was threatened and waited for police to arrive,” said Batterson

WHAT! Go inside and hide!,call the police and wait for help? What has this nation come to? We are a strong people who can take care of ourselves! People like Mr. Batterson can kiss my @ss. All Real Americans need to stand up an face evil when they see it. Mr. Batterson and people like him make me sick.

41 posted on 08/05/2011 6:16:27 AM PDT by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

It’s called assault with a deadly weapon . The home owner should have should have proned the guy out on the ground & called 911 on cell phone & stated that he had a guy who was trying to break into his house at gun point on the ground & hadn’t searched him .


42 posted on 08/05/2011 9:54:01 AM PDT by Nebr FAL owner (.308 reach out & thump someone .50 cal.Browning Machine gun reach out & crush someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

>”He was armed. He knew Mr. Gonzalez was unarmed.”
>How do they know he knew that?

Funny, the attitude the cops nationwide have when they confront lowly citizens is that they are armed. And Lord help you if you give them a look or make a movement they don’t like as has been proven lately. Plus when they kill unarmed citizens they get fully investigated, then fully whitewashed.


43 posted on 08/06/2011 7:51:55 AM PDT by Blackhawk45 (The 2nd Amendment - the only ccw you need!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Drill Thrawl

Agree. Batterson is a stupid cop and should be fired immediately before an innocent homeowner ends up dead at the hands of an “unarmed trespasser”.

These are the kind of cops who are more of a danger to the citizen than the criminal because the protect the criminal and abuse their powers of arrest of the victim.

PS: My son is a federal police officer. He is trained to deal with a perp. The average citizen is not. But he will shoot, and is authorized to shoot, if there is a “clear and present” threat. Otherwise, as his team has done, they take down the crazies with some good tackling and a few punches to disarm/disable.


44 posted on 01/30/2012 6:51:15 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

An ideal case for Jury Nullification if it ever comes to trial.


45 posted on 01/30/2012 6:52:09 PM PST by Timocrat (Ingnorantia non excusat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

This instance just might pass the Castle doctrine law, and get Batterson fired, a double win for civilization.


46 posted on 01/30/2012 6:53:51 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Covenants? We don’t need no stinkin covenants!


47 posted on 01/30/2012 7:01:27 PM PST by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kingu
You are absolutely correct, either you fire with the expectation that great bodily harm or death may result or you do not fire at all. I'm surprised and a little appalled that some people still believe that a warning shot is a valid option.

People really need to think before grabbing a gun and mindlessly rushing outside their home to confront someone. The most important thing is to protect the lives of your family and yourself. Next is to protect yourself from criminal and civil liability. The least important is protecting property; it can be replaced, but your life and freedom cannot.

If this had happened to me I would have been filming the trespasser with my camera in one hand and my cell phone in the other. If he grabbed a bike ($70 at Walmart?) and took off with it, I'd have a nice record of him and his crime to give to the police. When the legal system (there is no justice system in this country anymore) gets done chewing on this guy I wonder if he'll think it was worth it. I doubt it.

48 posted on 01/30/2012 7:20:13 PM PST by LiveFree99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

South Carolina does not require you to back away if threatened, not even if someone threatens you in the middle of a Wal-Mart! You have the right to defend yourself WHERE YOU STAND when threatened by another.


49 posted on 01/30/2012 7:34:13 PM PST by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson