Skip to comments.US Long-Term Rating Lowered To 'AA+' Due To Political Risks, Rising Debt Burden; Outlook Negative
Posted on 08/05/2011 6:52:37 PM PDT by NoLibZone
TORONTO (Standard & Poor's) Aug. 5, 2011--Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said today that it lowered its long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States of America to 'AA+' from 'AAA'. Standard & Poor's also said that the outlook on the long-term rating is negative. At the same time, Standard & Poor's affirmed its 'A-1+' short-term rating on the U.S. In addition, Standard & Poor's removed both ratings from CreditWatch, where they were placed on July 14, 2011, with negative implications.
The transfer and convertibility (T&C) assessment of the U.S.--our assessment of the likelihood of official interference in the ability of U.S.-based public- and private-sector issuers to secure foreign exchange for debt service--remains 'AAA'.
We lowered our long-term rating on the U.S. because we believe that the prolonged controversy over raising the statutory debt ceiling and the related fiscal policy debate indicate that further near-term progress containing the growth in public spending, especially on entitlements, or on reaching an agreement on raising revenues is less likely than we previously assumed and will remain a contentious and fitful process. We also believe that the fiscal consolidation plan that Congress and the Administration agreed to this week falls short of the amount that we believe is necessary to stabilize the general government debt burden by the middle of the decade.
Our lowering of the rating was prompted by our view on the rising public debt burden and our perception of greater policymaking uncertainty, consistent with our criteria (see "Sovereign Government Rating Methodology and Assumptions ," June 30, 2011, especially Paragraphs 36-41). Nevertheless, we view the U.S. federal government's other economic, external, and monetary credit attributes, which form the basis for the sovereign rating, as broadly unchanged.
We have taken the ratings off CreditWatch because the Aug. 2 passage of the Budget Control Act Amendment of 2011 has removed any perceived immediate threat of payment default posed by delays to raising the government's debt ceiling. In addition, we believe that the act provides sufficient clarity to allow us to evaluate the likely course of U.S. fiscal policy for the next few years.
The political brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as America's governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective, and less predictable than what we previously believed. The statutory debt ceiling and the threat of default have become political bargaining chips in the debate over fiscal policy. Despite this year's wide-ranging debate, in our view, the differences between political parties have proven to be extraordinarily difficult to bridge, and, as we see it, the resulting agreement fell well short of the comprehensive fiscal consolidation program that some proponents had envisaged until quite recently. Republicans and Democrats have only been able to agree to relatively modest savings on discretionary spending while delegating to the Select Committee decisions on more comprehensive measures. It appears that for now, new revenues have dropped down on the menu of policy options. In addition, the plan envisions only minor policy changes on Medicare and little change in other entitlements, the containment of which we and most other independent observers regard as key to long-term fiscal sustainability.
Our opinion is that elected officials remain wary of tackling the structural issues required to effectively address the rising U.S. public debt burden in a manner consistent with a 'AAA' rating and with 'AAA' rated sovereign peers (see Sovereign Government Rating Methodology and Assumptions," June 30, 2011, especially Paragraphs 36-41). In our view, the difficulty in framing a consensus on fiscal policy weakens the government's ability to manage public finances and diverts attention from the debate over how to achieve more balanced and dynamic economic growth in an era of fiscal stringency and private-sector deleveraging (ibid). A new political consensus might (or might not) emerge after the 2012 elections, but we believe that by then, the government debt burden will likely be higher, the needed medium-term fiscal adjustment potentially greater, and the inflection point on the U.S. population's demographics and other age-related spending drivers closer at hand (see "Global Aging 2011: In The U.S., Going Gray Will Likely Cost Even More Green, Now," June 21, 2011).
Standard & Poor's takes no position on the mix of spending and revenue measures that Congress and the Administration might conclude is appropriate for putting the U.S.'s finances on a sustainable footing.
The act calls for as much as $2.4 trillion of reductions in expenditure growth over the 10 years through 2021. These cuts will be implemented in two steps: the $917 billion agreed to initially, followed by an additional $1.5 trillion that the newly formed Congressional Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction is supposed to recommend by November 2011. The act contains no measures to raise taxes or otherwise enhance revenues, though the committee could recommend them.
he act further provides that if Congress does not enact the committee's recommendations, cuts of $1.2 trillion will be implemented over the same time period. The reductions would mainly affect outlays for civilian discretionary spending, defense, and Medicare. We understand that this fall-back mechanism is designed to encourage Congress to embrace a more balanced mix of expenditure savings, as the committee might recommend.
We note that in a letter to Congress on Aug. 1, 2011, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated total budgetary savings under the act to be at least $2.1 trillion over the next 10 years relative to its baseline assumptions. In updating our own fiscal projections, with certain modifications outlined below, we have relied on the CBO's latest "Alternate Fiscal Scenario" of June 2011, updated to include the CBO assumptions contained in its Aug. 1 letter to Congress. In general, the CBO's "Alternate Fiscal Scenario" assumes a continuation of recent Congressional action overriding existing law.
We view the act's measures as a step toward fiscal consolidation. However, this is within the framework of a legislative mechanism that leaves open the details of what is finally agreed to until the end of 2011, and Congress and the Administration could modify any agreement in the future. Even assuming that at least $2.1 trillion of the spending reductions the act envisages are implemented, we maintain our view that the U.S. net general government debt burden (all levels of government combined, excluding liquid financial assets) will likely continue to grow. Under our revised base case fiscal scenario--which we consider to be consistent with a 'AA+' long-term rating and a negative outlook--we now project that net general government debt would rise from an estimated 74% of GDP by the end of 2011 to 79% in 2015 and 85% by 2021. Even the projected 2015 ratio of sovereign indebtedness is high in relation to those of peer credits and, as noted, would continue to rise under the act's revised policy settings.
Compared with previous projections, our revised base case scenario now assumes that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, due to expire by the end of 2012, remain in place. We have changed our assumption on this because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue to resist any measure that would raise revenues, a position we believe Congress reinforced by passing the act. Key macroeconomic assumptions in the base case scenario include trend real GDP growth of 3% and consumer price inflation near 2% annually over the decade.
Our revised upside scenario--which, other things being equal, we view as consistent with the outlook on the 'AA+' long-term rating being revised to stable--retains these same macroeconomic assumptions. In addition, it incorporates $950 billion of new revenues on the assumption that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for high earners lapse from 2013 onwards, as the Administration is advocating. In this scenario, we project that the net general government debt would rise from an estimated 74% of GDP by the end of 2011 to 77% in 2015 and to 78% by 2021.
Our revised downside scenario--which, other things being equal, we view as being consistent with a possible further downgrade to a 'AA' long-term rating--features less-favorable macroeconomic assumptions, as outlined below and also assumes that the second round of spending cuts (at least $1.2 trillion) that the act calls for does not occur. This scenario also assumes somewhat higher nominal interest rates for U.S. Treasuries. We still believe that the role of the U.S. dollar as the key reserve currency confers a government funding advantage, one that could change only slowly over time, and that Fed policy might lean toward continued loose monetary policy at a time of fiscal tightening. Nonetheless, it is possible that interest rates could rise if investors re-price relative risks. As a result, our alternate scenario factors in a 50 basis point (bp)-75 bp rise in 10-year bond yields relative to the base and upside cases from 2013 onwards. In this scenario, we project the net public debt burden would rise from 74% of GDP in 2011 to 90% in 2015 and to 101% by 2021.
Our revised scenarios also take into account the significant negative revisions to historical GDP data that the Bureau of Economic Analysis announced on July 29. From our perspective, the effect of these revisions underscores two related points when evaluating the likely debt trajectory of the U.S. government. First, the revisions show that the recent recession was deeper than previously assumed, so the GDP this year is lower than previously thought in both nominal and real terms. Consequently, the debt burden is slightly higher. Second, the revised data highlight the sub-par path of the current economic recovery when compared with rebounds following previous post-war recessions. We believe the sluggish pace of the current economic recovery could be consistent with the experiences of countries that have had financial crises in which the slow process of debt deleveraging in the private sector leads to a persistent drag on demand. As a result, our downside case scenario assumes relatively modest real trend GDP growth of 2.5% and inflation of near 1.5% annually going forward.
When comparing the U.S. to sovereigns with 'AAA' long-term ratings that we view as relevant peers--Canada, France, Germany, and the U.K.--we also observe, based on our base case scenarios for each, that the trajectory of the U.S.'s net public debt is diverging from the others. Including the U.S., we estimate that these five sovereigns will have net general government debt to GDP ratios this year ranging from 34% (Canada) to 80% (the U.K.), with the U.S. debt burden at 74%. By 2015, we project that their net public debt to GDP ratios will range between 30% (lowest, Canada) and 83% (highest, France), with the U.S. debt burden at 79%. However, in contrast with the U.S., we project that the net public debt burdens of these other sovereigns will begin to decline, either before or by 2015.
Standard & Poor's transfer T&C assessment of the U.S. remains 'AAA'. Our T&C assessment reflects our view of the likelihood of the sovereign restricting other public and private issuers' access to foreign exchange needed to meet debt service. Although in our view the credit standing of the U.S. government has deteriorated modestly, we see little indication that official interference of this kind is entering onto the policy agenda of either Congress or the Administration. Consequently, we continue to view this risk as being highly remote.
The outlook on the long-term rating is negative. As our downside alternate fiscal scenario illustrates, a higher public debt trajectory than we currently assume could lead us to lower the long-term rating again. On the other hand, as our upside scenario highlights, if the recommendations of the Congressional Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction--independently or coupled with other initiatives, such as the lapsing of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for high earners--lead to fiscal consolidation measures beyond the minimum mandated, and we believe they are likely to slow the deterioration of the government's debt dynamics, the long-term rating could stabilize at 'AA+'.
On Monday, we will issue separate releases concerning affected ratings in the funds, government-related entities, financial institutions, insurance, public finance, and structured finance sectors.
on a Friday after closing, bet this gets somebodies attention - or not...
In other words, due to Obama and his Team.
It's going to keep dropping
This is on the S&P website RIGHT NOW.
They aren’t reconsidering anything, or we wouldn’t be reading this.
I’m hoping some FReepers that know of such things can weigh in on just how bad this truly is. I’ve read so many theories and opinions, I don’t know what to believe. All I know, is this ain’t good!
Don’t forget Bush, Clinton, Bush, etc. All the way back.
We didn’t get here over night.
</sarcasm for the idiots>
Fire Obama — ASAP!!! Get that incompetent political fraud out of our White House and replace him with a pro-American, capitalist mind that will get our house in order.
I am sick of this creep and his mob of thugs and their policy to destroy our country.
Just more “change” we can believe in.
The average American has a better credit rating than the US government.
“All I know, is this aint good!”
Not unless you’re shorting the stock market Monday morning...
This is what happens when our government is out of control and does whatever they want. Time for a big change and I’m not talking about the type of change Obama wants.
S&P 8-5-11 on US Rating Downgrade
Liberalism is killing our economy. We were knew this decades ago and the politicians did nothing but nibble around the edges. Too little people working and too many living off the .gov by welfare etc. and entitlements and .gov employees. The chickens are coming home to roost. The 1990’s were the roaring twenties. People in the .com bubble riding high and living high on the hog. Now people will just wonder if they can have a hog. Get ready and for those of us old enough think of your grandparents and how they lived during the depression. This time I do not know if this country has what it takes to make it through hard times. I am afraid of riots and such.
We were handling it until January 20, 2009.
The Chicago mob and the DC thugs are planning massive levels of pain and retribution against S&P for this dastardly act. S&P, and others considering following suit, will learn that you cross The One at your own peril.
god help us, this just keeps getting better and better.
If I hear or see the eupemism “revenue enhancement” one more time, I’m going to throw up.
It’s time for the taxpayers to tell the taxeaters to push away from the through.
Martin Armstrong believes that a lot of this money will go into stocks, driving the DJIA to 50,000 over time. He also believes the money will go into gold, driving it up to $5000 per ounce or higher.
Others believe that stocks will go the way of bonds and all other paper financial instruments, and the money will go into physical gold and silver, fueling a rise that could take gold to $12,500 or above.
We are in for interesting times.
May 19, 2008
Obama deserves impeachment for malfeasance in office---the boob has no idea how to run a country.
Boehner should resign in disgrace and shame. But these adulterous traitorous fools were ambushed by military and antipatriotic budget cuts and followed through. RINOs never resign in shame, they “change point of view” and side or back stab us.
Only when a liberal shames them do they resign. We know who their boss is.
I bet that the White House Professors are going through their Case Study textbooks trying to find the solution.
“If you can’t make a living at it. You teach it!” —————Unknown Under grad student - 1959.
Geitner dared say they forgot a formula in the calculation and they need to redo it so we get back to AAA. Ah, fat chance of that, like they are going to listen to him.
In other words, it’s a tacit admission of playing with formulas to look good at this point in time.
In a normal world
Bush was a lame duck since 2006 and they were in control
Yea! I wonder how much George Soros will make on this move by S&P???
Watch them now making us guilty for not paying our taxes... I dare them call us terrorists or some other word they transformed into some biggoted N like word insult for their benefit.
Moodys, S&P Caved In to Ratings Pressure From Goldman, UBS Over Mortgages
'splain that, S&P.
THIS.....is Obama’s legacy right here. He owns this.
Wonder how many White-House “insiders” used this information to get out before Monday?
there will not be a Monday morning as we used to know it
Which will immediately be spun around and blamed on the Tea Party by the Lame Stream Media...
When Clinton left office, the debt to GDP ratio was 57%. When Bush left office (eight years later), the ratio was 69%. After 2.5 years of the Obama/Mugabe Rule the ratio is 97%.
Obama = EPIC FAIL.
This is real bad. In one fell swoop The US has lost it’s A-List status in the world arena. There is also a monetary punishment that accompanies this. Any, and it surely wasn’t much to start with, so called budget cuts will be wiped out and then some by the raise in interest rates this loss in AAA status will bring. I don’t know what the figures will be once the dust settles but the USA is a whole lot deeper in debt as of now.
umm, uhh...what was GDP growth then? Unemployment? Things that are needed to service debt, which determine creditworthiness?
It's one thing if honorable people run an enterprise that carries debt; it's another if delusional, self-hating incompetents do.
You meditate on that and have a good weekend.
That reminds me that the Zimbabwe stock market skyrocketed while their country collapsed too
I just got a newsletter earlier today from the group that runs our 401K plan. And they have bought gold and siver and are going to short the market. Hope they are right.
well, it wasn’t exactly insider information, we all knew it was but a matter of time.
(I got out last year, my timing off a tad but not by much).
But, to answer your question, I would imagine ALL the smart ones did but idealists - nnawww
Yes you do!!
S&P heard Geitner blame defaulting on his taxes because of a software error, and, having none of his lameness, they reconsidered after Geitner's pleas and downgraded our rating, nevertheless.
We note that in a letter to Congress on Aug. 1, 2011, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated total budgetary savings under the act to be at least $2.1 trillion over the next 10 years relative to its baseline assumptions.
“IN A LETTER SENT TO CONGRESS”.
EVERY Congressman who voted for the bill REID AND OBAMA wanted, needs to go.
ESPECIALLY Boehner and McConnell. They either KNEW this would happen, or they are too stupid to remain in office.
Let’s be honest here. The ongoing decline in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies — which has been going on for at least 5-6 years — was a tacit admission by the entire world that the U.S. “credit rating” was far lower than AAA to begin with.
"...reaching an agreement on raising revenues is less likely than we previously assumed and will remain a contentious and fitful process."
The act contains no measures to raise taxes or otherwise enhance revenues, though the committee could recommend them."
"Compared with previous projections, our revised base case scenario now assumes that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, due to expire by the end of 2012, remain in place. We have changed our assumption on this because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue to resist any measure that would raise revenues..."
"Standard & Poor's takes no position on the mix of spending and revenue measures that Congress and the Administration might conclude is appropriate for putting the U.S.'s finances on a sustainable footing."
Anyone else smell bovine excrement here?