Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Truckin’ through new EPA regulations
NetRight Daily ^ | August 11, 2011 | Rebekah Rast

Posted on 08/11/2011 4:00:18 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Buy railroad stocks now. They will not have to market their services, just answer their phones.


21 posted on 08/11/2011 6:27:59 PM PDT by Surfscoter (Surfscoter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PiperShade; twistedwrench
They’re going to great lengths to itemize just how much they’re doing to improve fuel efficiency and how difficult that process is.<

Yeah, and it's funny how the OEM puts out an engine that is suppose to get "great" mileage, only to fall flat on it's face!

I.E.- The CAT C-15 twin turbo. Junk as far as fuel mileage is concerned. And a money sucking engine to maintain!

No wonder there are so many convertion kits for these back to single turbo!

It all boils down to the EPA with their heads up their ass, as always!

22 posted on 08/11/2011 6:46:14 PM PDT by MountainDad (Support your local Militia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PiperShade
Still recall my first few weeks driving a “stoichemetric” Mack

Macks really ARE horrible "dogs".

E-tech engines are the worst. The MP7 seems to be a little improvement, but they will never be as good as the old E-7's.

What year and and model are you driving?

23 posted on 08/11/2011 6:59:58 PM PDT by MountainDad (Support your local Militia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Guess we can all just turn off our engines when going down hill - coasting silent saves fuel *major sarc*


24 posted on 08/11/2011 7:00:28 PM PDT by libertarian27 (Agenda21: Dept. of Life, Dept. of Liberty and the Dept. of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian27

in the politically incorrect lingo of truckers...

“Mexican overdrive”


25 posted on 08/11/2011 7:02:50 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: libertarian27

Georgia overdrive!


26 posted on 08/11/2011 7:05:37 PM PDT by griswold3 (Character is Destiny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: twistedwrench
It’s really a shame, the mid to late 90’s, Early 2000 engines were good on fuel mileage and power.

Yes they were. Now with the EPA regs. we can no longer say that.

But hey! We get to spend more money on DEF now! Yippie!

27 posted on 08/11/2011 7:06:44 PM PDT by MountainDad (Support your local Militia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MountainDad

Nothin’ like a little “cow piss” to brighten your day, LOL.


28 posted on 08/11/2011 7:08:39 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
Nothin’ like a little “cow piss” to brighten your day, LOL.

Lol...Yep. And don't forget that the cow-piss freezes at 11 degrees F.

Make sure the DEF tank heaters are working!

29 posted on 08/11/2011 7:17:54 PM PDT by MountainDad (Support your local Militia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Trucking is already taking a hit because people aren’t buying as much. The EPA needs to be dismantled.


30 posted on 08/12/2011 3:43:44 AM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nightshift

Gnip


31 posted on 08/12/2011 3:44:31 AM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

“President Obama and the EPA promise the upfront costs will more than pay for themselves after a year or two,..”

Which is it? 1 year or 2 years to TARR the investment? The gov’t drones don’t really care or they would be able to answer that question, instead it is once again all about control and only control.


32 posted on 08/12/2011 6:44:46 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the "Dave Ramsey Fan" ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MountainDad

That was some 8 years’ back. They were R tri-axles with 350 hp engines ahead of what most of the drivers called a 13-speed.

They were a bad build, as the rears were too high, (low numerically). Trucks would cut out on high speed (75 mph on most) before high rpm. Way too fast for a tri-axle in the East. Made them a greyhound on the flat but a chiuahua on even a tiny hill. >MW


33 posted on 08/12/2011 7:06:34 PM PDT by PiperShade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson