Posted on 08/12/2011 2:03:53 AM PDT by markomalley
I heard a Boston university student say that she voted twice in the 2000 election for Kerry because she just KNEW that the Republicans were going to steal the election.
Kinda like using the logic that the odds to there being a bomb on a plane are a million to one and the odds of there being TWO bombs are a million times a million to one so to be safe, always pack a bomb along.
I am shocked.
Only twice?
You must ... You must - BUT only with the FULL quote from the scene:
Rick:
How can you close me up? On what grounds?
Captain Renault:
I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!
[A croupier comes over and surreptiociously hands Renault a pile of money]
Croupier [In a loud voice]:
Your winnings, Sir!
Captain Renault [in a sotto voice]:
Oh, thank you very much ...
Captain Renault: [Aloud]:
Everybody out at once!
Honestly, BOTH MAJOR POLITICAL PARTIES, ALL MINOR POLITICAL PARTIES, AND ALL POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES are at fault for this kind of ongoing behavior, and it’s not just the fault of the Democrats and the political left. Also, this kind of thing is, probably, happening worldwide, and it’s not just the U.S. that has this ongoing problem. Can the problem of repeated voting ever be ended 100%? I doubt it. Can voter photo ID end this ongoing problem? No.
Maryland has major voter fraud because no ID verification can be requested from the voter!
They DON’T know who is voting.
I have a very, VERY strong suspicion that this happens all across the country.
Comparing signatures might be subjective. I support photo-ID, and more vigorous and severe punishment for voter fraud.
Okay, let's all sing the song and play the game: "One of these is not like the others..."
1.) "Motor Voter"
2.) "Voter Fraud"
3.) "Cloward Piven"
4.) "Constitutional, Lawful and Trustworthy"
What do you suggest? That we shrug our shoulders and say “Oh well...can’t do anything about it...”?
Would you be an advocate of using the index fingerprint as an identifier linked to a citizen (requiring a national database) or would that be too intrusive?
I whole-heartedly agree...and it is possible that the people of the America I was born in would have supported the application of the death penalty in this situation.
Nowadays in the era of criminal coddling and political correctness; I will be stunned if the judge has the balls to sentence them to the 15-month maximum. He fears the riots...
Vote fraud is theft of government.
∴, treason.
A few public hangings will fix the problem.
That's how we did it in Kalifornia, also.
I'm for a Voter ID *AND* the purple ink dip on the finger.
Maybe there is something we can learn from the Iraqis after all.
In California, as I understand it, should you get to the polls and find that someone else has signed by your name on the poll list, the poll workers will give you a provisional ballot. The provisional ballot is held out of the count until the signature discrepancy is investigated by the registrar of voters. Then the provisional ballot is or is not added to the final count, depending on the outcome of the investigation. Of course, the original fraudulent ballot has already been counted.
.is that there is more control over buying alcohol at the local 7-11 than there is over voting.
Well said, but hardly amusing.
America is full of heinous rational hypocrisy to the tune of raw political power play.
Another example: One can take a bullet for the country, and vote (the most precious and deliberative act of democracy), at 18, but not buy a beer or wine.
Unfortunately, people will, always, find ways to cheat, no matter what is/isn’t done about any issue, because it’s an imperfect world. Besides, the best of lawyers can find loopholes in anything and everything!
we needed every state in 2008 and we lost some that should have been “ours” and I can’t help thinking that along with the Soros money, the union thugs, the black panther thugs, and fishy finanical meltdown, that there also was widespread cheating in close states...
“tip of the iceberg,,,,, think electoral college and demoncrats hate it so”
Exactly, with a federal popular vote, North Carolina’s irresponsible self-influenced voter fraud problem becomes everyone’s problem.
The trouble with that is that nobody except north Carolina can do anything about North Carolina’s problems.
Furthermore North Carolina will have ZERO incentive to do anything about the problem which raises it’s power in the Federal theater.
There is a reason we got an electoral collage, the fact that people don’t understand our system is a very dangerous system.
“In California, as I understand it, should you get to the polls and find that someone else has signed by your name on the poll list, the poll workers will give you a provisional ballot. The provisional ballot is held out of the count until the signature discrepancy is investigated by the registrar of voters. Then the provisional ballot is or is not added to the final count, depending on the outcome of the investigation. Of course, the original fraudulent ballot has already been counted.”
Precisely so what’s the point?
Are they hoping that you vote first, and that the guy trying to steal your vote only get there 2nd?
There is a reason democrats go after the dead first, they know the dead never get to the polls before they do.
“What do you suggest? That we shrug our shoulders and say Oh well...cant do anything about it...?
Would you be an advocate of using the index fingerprint as an identifier linked to a citizen (requiring a national database) or would that be too intrusive?”
we do need to be sure folk are not voting multiple times in multiple states, but this is still basically a State problem.
It can be solved in the lengthily registerion period. The State needs to go to all the other states (starting with the States nearby) to make sure they unregistered you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.