Posted on 08/14/2011 12:00:53 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
In following your link I notice that he also made a promise to sign the Susan B. Anthony pledge, which includes a promise to support immoral, unconstitutional “fetal pain” legislation.
Suit yourself. I've got better things to do than point out your false assertions and shifting objections.
They’re only wrong if they use a HLA as an excuse to do nothing, when our Constitution already states as its ultimate purpose the securing of the Blessings of Liberty to Posterity, and in multiple Amendments imperatively demands that every person’s right to life be protected.
If they want to allow the killing of innocents, let THEM try to overturn the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution’s statement of purpose, and the Fifth and the Fourteenth Amendments.
Of course if they succeeded, the republic would be dead.
Which it will be anyway if we don’t start providing equal protection to all persons once again.
Perry and his ilk have no intention of doing that. All they’re after is the political cover that corrupt groups like National Right to Life are happy to hand them.
Then your criticisms should then be directed at every single candidate, since none of them share your view.
They are.
He sure won’t be telling us what to eat!
There is a clear difference between having a passion for a true conservative candidate and worshiping her. I, for example, only worship God. I do have passion for Ms. Palin because of a belief she is the only candidate who has a chance on getting this country back on track. Other people I have passion toward are my wife, kids, Church, and friends. I don't worship any of them.
Instead of mocking her supporter's passion, one should present facts, if any, as to why Sarah Palin is not conservative, would not be a good leader, has poor character, etc. The other crap and name-calling is just that....crap. .
Facts are not really relevant when one is trying to predict the future. It's especially difficult in the Palin situation, since she remains unclear as to her intentions.
We are then left with our opinions and our passion.
My own thinking is to wonder if she can flip her negatives once she declares. I'm pretty much convinced that she cannot. I am pretty much convinced that if she does enter, we will see Alan Keyes - Part II (or is it III or IV? I forget.)
And I was a huge Keyes supporter - gave him more money than I ever did to a candidate. But he could not overcome his negative, despite the brilliance of his message.
I learned a lesson from that.
Although my take on Trademark's actions might not fit your idealized vision of her, it is perfectly valid and based on her actions since quitting in Alaska. Repeat, her actions - not her words...you see I was taught that they (actions) are a far better indicator of someone's motives than his or her words.
>>>>Are you suffering from PMS?
No, I’m suffering from idiocy like you just exhibited.
Then what is relevant, if not facts, when trying to predict the future or pick a candidate to support? Are Emotions or personal bias a better way?
I actually liked Keys myself, but his negatives, lack of experience and lack of star power could never be overcome. Palin is a whole new ballgame since many honest people who do not care for her have been mis-led by the false negatives put out by the MSM. False negatives can be overcome over time, and certainly can if we fight. Sarah Palin has star power. She also has a large base that will vote. Her hardest fight is to get the nomination. Once nominated, it really comes to who can gets out their base. I believe Sarah can get out the base. Zero's base, by current indicators, may stay home
I will only do that if she gets the nomination, she is going to have to work for it. Fox News isn’t helping her either, by looking like they are trying to hand the nomination to her, for who knows what reason why.
The problem I have with Palin, is that I believe she is running alright, she has been running for 2 years, that’s why she resigned as Governor. I don’t like her pretending that she is still deciding, and dragging God into it while she lies. It’s just ugly to the bone that she would do such a thing.
I do believe we're getting closer to the truth about the real cause of your dislike for Sarah Palin...
;^\
The debt was incurred by the voters, who approved the bond issue for the sports complex. Palin specifically wanted the voters to approve it. The bonds were paid off a year in advance.
Find something else to b!tch about.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.