Posted on 08/17/2011 2:26:24 PM PDT by Korah
I would never suggest that the crimes committed against blacks in America through the years were minor, nor justified, but as bad as white Americans treated blacks, there has never been instances where white teenagers roamed the parks, beaches, and fairgrounds for the express purpose of attacking people just because they are black. If they did, there would have been hell to pay by both the law and their parents.
As I pondered the lack of legal actions against the mobs of marauding blacks, I was reminded of the time in the late 1990s when Wayne LaPierre stated that then president Bill Clinton had accepted a certain amount of violence to further his pursuit of more gun-control laws. Simply put, the NRA executive accused the Clinton administration of not enforcing gun laws already on the books so that he could justify the need for stricter gun laws. Looking at the way gun violence in America decreased when Bush became president proves that LaPierre was right about the Clinton administration. As much as George Bush believed in the 2nd Amendment, he was also firm believer in enforcing the law. So unlike the prior administration Bush instructed his DOJ to enforce the gun laws on the books. An interesting, but expected, thing happens when you enforce the laws, would be criminals are less likely to violate them.
So now we have another liberal Democrat as president, and like Clinton did, he too has instructed his DOJ not to enforce a certain aspect of the law. You can always guess what a liberal administration is up to by what laws they conveniently ignore. In Obama's case it's the civil rights laws. Oh he may be enforcing certain aspects of the civil rights laws, like the ones that white Americans violate, but his justice dept is ignoring the ones violated by black Americans. I guess Obama could be accepting a certain amount of civil rights violations so he can pursue more civil rights laws, but I doubt it. No, instead I believe he has other reasons for ignoring the escalation in violence being perpetrated against white Americans since he became president.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsblaze.com ...
Ever vigilant my Friends, time to be ever vigilant.
We need to alert all our friends and relatives to what is going on so they do not get fooled by the lies of the MSM.
We know they will do all they can to get Obama re-elected by accusing Republicans of inciting hate against him because he is black. That is why they have not been covering the mob attacks on whites all summer.
Like the article says, they do not what America to know why whites in the big cities are mad, they want them to think it is all the Republican and Tea Party members fault.
yeah, well screw the permits...
Proud Fosssil,
With all due respect to your long term membership here at Free Republic, how can You legitemately compare Obama HUSSEIN’s Power Grabs to Media Bullcrap about a True American hero, George W. Bush, who the Media ran an allout slander campaign for every second of his Eight Year Presidency, yet we are denied every detail of this Butthole’s life has been obfuscated, hidden, or Lied About!
“Was that a practice for what Obama is planning for America in 2012? Full OUT RACE WARS!??? It worked in KENYA at Obama’s Direction!!”
Yes, I believe so; and have repeatedly said as much on Free Republic for quite some time.
1. Blacks are cowards unless they are in a mob, but as soon as someone starts shooting at them, them run. That is why the Hispanics control the gang world in general. That is why you do not see the mobs going against white armed citizens. That is why they only really riot in the black neighborhoods. Case in point, Watts. They never went to any areas in mass. They only burned black places and beat up whites who went into Watts.
2. Whites would turn against the fraud in the White House in a blink of an eye if blacks started anything. Our country still has a deep rooted racism in it and the jerk in the White House knows it. If blacks started rioting against the whites he would be compelled to stop it because he wants to be re-elected. Why do you think the Mayor of Philly is so upset about the flash mobs. He knows that every one of those destroys his re-election.
3. I knew people in 2006 and especially in 2008 who committed themselves to arming themselves, building fortifications around their house, etc. because of the idea of martial law.
4. And if something did start, remember we have beaten every asshole in war until the liberals started managing the war. If this did start we would be removing the liberals, not listening to them. AND THEY KNOW IT.
5. I am prepared but I am not going to sit around and worry about it. I have much better things to do.
6. And besides Elnin or Nirubu or whatever the conspiracy freaks call them are going to destroy our world within the next 30 days so why worry. Also the north pole is going to shift, massive earthquakes are going to split us apart, and EMTs from the sun will destroy all electronics.
7. Get a life, be prepared, Don't Tread on Me, and Remember the Alamo.
[ I would put this conjecture in the same category as when people were saying that President Bush would declare martial law and suspend the 2004, 2006, and 2008 elections. ]
The Republicans, despite being RINO infested still plays by the “Gentlemen’s Rules”, The Dims, not so much. I am far more worried about race riots and martial law next summer because the other side doesn’t like so much to play by the rules, but like to play WITH the rules.
The Dimsw predictiosn for 2004 and 2006 and 2008 may very well be a case of liberal Pre-Projection.
[ Maybe Obama does want a race war, what better way to accuse Republicans of racism, then to goad us into retaliating when they attack us? ]
They know our side “Plays By the Rules” so they can;t simply wait for us to “Start Something” so they will have to provke us then accuse us of being the provokers....
At what point then should we retaliate?
When 10% of us are DOA, 50% , 70% ?
What is the optimal point that Retalaition becomes a good idea and not a liability?
This is quite common. Whenever there's a "successful" revolution, those who actually started it are usually exterminated once things settle down and power has been accumulated. Castro did it. As did Hitler, with "The Night of the Long Knives."
Most "revolutionaries" don't seem to realize that those who take over the power don't want successful revolutionaries around, who might overthrow them.
Mark
Those “twitter twits” better stay on Wall Street. If they’re lookin’ for real trouble they’ll find it......on “Main Street”.
I am not comparing Sheetheads power grabs to media bullcrap about a really true American Hero. I am comparing the hysteria of some people on FR over a rumour with no basis in fact, just conjecture to that of the liberals in 2006 and 2008 who just knew that the military was going to take over the country.
I think ASSAMA is the worst thing to happen to this country since the Battle at Bunker's (actually Breed's) Hill. I never voted for him. I did not like McCain, but still voted for him. I have argued with all kinds of dimheads, including brother in laws and my son about what a mess Zero is.
But I do think the fear that he is going to instil race riots is ridiculous. I would counter with this. There are enough white racial bigots who would jump at the chance to kill blacks. And they know it. And they know those bigots are armed with plenty of ammunition.
If TPTB started confiscating weapons from the civilians then I would agree they would be trying to start something. But to suggest the blacks are going to storm the fortress armed with spears (as in Zulu Land) to save the half-breed in the White House is just plain stupid.
And you are right, the media is the second worst thing to come to this country since the lost of New York in the Revolution.
Remember it was only a few days ago that the Liberal butt wipes were talking about the Tea Party being such radical people. Sarah Palin using a rifle for hunting was the cause of the Giffords shooting. Most of that has simply been laughed at.
So now I have a question, could this article and some of the comments be simply a plant by the liberal fartheads to stir up trouble in the normal people of this country? Could they be trying to start something that could lead to the riots they so wish for?
Remember we live in an age of supreme lies, propaganda, and spin. To compare our country to Russia in 1915 as some have is ludicrous. Yes, we have many unemployed, but we do not have massive starvation, massive conscription to go fight the Hun (Irag, Libya). Plus the commies were well trained in revolt and had been working at it for 20 years. They seized the opportunity and it worked. We do not have the same situation now, far from it.
As was said often back in 1776, be careful, be observant, but keep your powder dry. I do not think anything will happen in 2012 (depending upon who wins the Super Bowl, the NBA playoffs, and the World Series. Those do cause riots for a day or two).
With a few key strokes Obama could have nationwide riots.
Ann Coulter was just on TV talking about liberal incited riots through out history. Ann has a new book out(Demonic) dealing with exactly this subject.
No one ever said the left was smart.
0bama and key members of his regime have been quietly inciting conflict between the races. One scenario might be: When open fighting breaks out, 0bama, never wanting to let a good crisis go by, will declare martial law. Since it will be close to the election, he will determine that there is too much turmoil for the election to be held and he will remain in the White House.
FUBO GTFO 2012 !
Let me tell you a little story.
During the 1967 Detroit riots, a bunch of Yooper National Guard troops were called down to Detroit to man a checkpoint. (Yoopers is a knickname of people from Michigan’s Upper Peninsula)
A bunch of black liberation thugs pulled up to the checkpoint in a Plymouth. They demanded that the Yooper guards stand aside and let them through. If they didn’t, they’d start shooting their pistols. The Yooper on the .50 cal opened fire on the Plymouth.
The next day, the Yoopers were quietly sent back to the Upper Peninsula and the riots in that part of Detroit ended.
I can also tell you about WWII vets who manned the barricades on the 6th St., 16th St., and 27th St. bridges over the viaducts in Milwaukee during the black liberation riots.
When Father Groppi, a liberation theologician, tried to lead his black communist mob into the white parts of Milwaukee, he faced men armed with rifles and shotguns at the barricades. These men were not bullshitting about killing these thugs. Many men in Milwaukee sat on their property armed with rifles, shotguns and pistols...waiting
On the south side of Milwaukee, ruled by Congressman Clement Zablocki, the black communists were outgunned and out-smarted.
Father Groppi turned his mob around.
Thanks Korah.
By the time 2012 rolls around, I don’t think we’ll have to worry about it — for a good while now, Zero has been helping out Jesse Jackson and cutting off his own balls.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.