Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Steffy: ‘Gulf of Mexico standoff: Exxon, U.S. battle over big find’
Fuel Fix ^ | August 18, 2011 | Loren Steffy

Posted on 08/18/2011 8:53:12 AM PDT by thackney

Oil companies are once again squaring off with government regulators in the Gulf of Mexico. This time, its Exxon Mobil. The giant oil company is fighting to retain leases for the Julia field, what could be the biggest oil discovery in the Gulf ever, or at least since BP’s Thunder Horse field in 1999. The problem: the government claims Exxon’s leases for the field have expired.

The Obama administration has been cracking down on unused offshore leases, which cost the Treasury royalties, the Wall Street Journal reported. Exxon seems to believe getting an extension on the lease was just a formality. “You state your case and you got it. [This] was unexpected,” a spokesman told the Journal.

For the past year, the industry and government regulators have been squabbling over how drilling should proceed in the Gulf. One thing is clear: This isn’t it. Obviously, Exxon should be following the rules on permit extensions, especially in a case where the stakes were so high. As the Journal describes it:

The Texas behemoth faces the sobering prospect that it may have made the largest discovery ever in the Gulf of Mexico only to lose it. Tens of billions of dollars of oil could slip through its hands because it failed to follow federal rules for getting a lease extension while it moved forward with plans to get the oil out of the ground.

The oil company claims drilling a well in deep water takes time to do safely, and that the government’s response creates a regulatory environment that encourages haste over thoroughness. Exxon also claims the government has changed its tactics and that its arguments for not extending the lease have never been applied before. The government says Exxon didn’t submit a specific production plan, which violated the legal requirements for granting a lease extension.

This battle, playing out in federal court in Lake Charles, La., dates to 2008, two years before the Deepwater Horizon disaster, but it illustrates the fundamental disconnect between the industry and the government that’s emerged in the Gulf. The industry acknowledges that last year’s accident changes everything, yet still seems surprised when it does. Recognizing that regulations must change, oil companies still argue, essentially, “We’ve never done it that way before.”

The government, meanwhile, seems so eager to show its a tougher regulator that it looses sight of the big picture. If it takes the leases away from Exxon, it will have to find another company to develop them. That will take even more time and cost even more lost royalty revenue. At the same time, it will only add to the confusion over the new regulatory scheme in the Gulf, potentially creating further delays for other projects as well.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; gom; offshore; oil
Exxon, U.S. Government Duel Over Huge Oil Find
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903596904576514762275032794.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories

WSJ excerpt:

...

The loss of the leases would be an enormous black eye for Exxon. The company hadn't previously disclosed the size of the discovery in what is called the Julia field until it was mentioned in the suit Exxon filed against the Interior Department last week in federal court in Lake Charles, La.

...

Now the department must decide whether to fight Exxon in court or settle and allow it to develop the oil. Turning the leases over to another company would mean further delays to the tax royalties that would go to government coffers. At current prices, potential royalties paid to the government over the lifetime of a one billion-barrel field would be about $10.95 billion.

1 posted on 08/18/2011 8:53:20 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

this sounds like a GOP campaign talking point if ever I’ve heard one


2 posted on 08/18/2011 8:56:36 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The article makes the off base assumption that the Obama Administration wants the find developed.


3 posted on 08/18/2011 8:57:59 AM PDT by Ingtar (Together we go broke (from a Pookie18 post))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
You tell ‘em Obozo! Yep...with gas prices nudging $4/gal, what this country needs to fuel an economic recovery is its chief of state throwing a hissy fit because he doesn't like the way leaseholders are managing their assets, yet is stupid enough to dip into the SOR to sell enough oil for two day's worth of sales. You're an idiot, sir.
4 posted on 08/18/2011 8:59:17 AM PDT by econjack (Some people are dumber than soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

I am certain they want to re-auction those leases. The dollars it would bring in now after the discovery would be immense.

They can hold up the production permits for a long time, but they want to get the dollars for the lease auction.

They have done the same thing in the National Petroleum Reserve, Alaska for years.


5 posted on 08/18/2011 9:00:50 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

until that Worthless,skinny Commie and his lackeys are Voted out,we will have a HUGE energy problem,which is the base of our economy, NOT TAXES!


6 posted on 08/18/2011 9:06:17 AM PDT by Cheetahcat ( NovemONLY -22??? this carnival side show should be in ber 4 2008 ,A date that will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
The author labors under the assumption that the Obama Administration wants to develop the oil leases at all. Could it be that the goal is to drag it out and make the cost so prohibitive that the gulf energy economy and the US is permanently injured?
7 posted on 08/18/2011 9:06:24 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

“this sounds like a GOP campaign talking point if ever I’ve heard one...”

Heh. I know Loren Steffy. He was my editor back when I was a columnist at THE BATTALION, school paper for Texas A&M..

I think Loren would be amused that he’s writing talking points for the GOP. =)


8 posted on 08/18/2011 9:06:59 AM PDT by Experiment 6-2-6 (Admn Mods: tiny, malicious things that glare and gibber from dark corners.They have pins and dolls..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
The article makes the off base assumption that the Obama Administration wants the find developed.

My first assumption is that in a corrupt administration the opportunity for graft will be irresistible.

9 posted on 08/18/2011 9:07:41 AM PDT by oldbrowser (They're socialists don't call them liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cheetahcat

The Health of our lifestyle depends on energy.


10 posted on 08/18/2011 9:10:05 AM PDT by Cheetahcat ( This carnival commie side started November 4 2008 ,A date that will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thackney

All politics aside. I work with the accounts payables (AP)department of many large corporations.

Little things can cause major disruptions. Back in the late 1990’s a major internet provider like Amazon or e-Bay was suddenly offline. The reason: AP had failed to pay a $50.00 bill to the internet name hosting company. This is something that is probably not billed, i.e. like rent; you are supposed to pay without receving a bill.

I wonder if these leases are managed the same way?


11 posted on 08/18/2011 9:10:47 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

“it will have to find another company to develop them”. This will either be China or Cuba. Count on it.


12 posted on 08/18/2011 9:12:14 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Sounds like Obama’s goons are trying to pull a Hugo Chavez. Can nationalization be far behind?


13 posted on 08/18/2011 9:15:33 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (Downgrade Obama in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb
"Can nationalization be far behind?"

Exactly, one of his unstated goals was nationalizing all oil and gas reserves in the US.

14 posted on 08/18/2011 9:18:51 AM PDT by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2001convSVT

All those offshore reserves past the state boundaries are already under federal control. That is why private companies have to lease the access to them from the Federal Government.


15 posted on 08/18/2011 9:37:02 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: thackney

*


16 posted on 08/18/2011 9:42:29 AM PDT by PMAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PMAS

#


17 posted on 08/18/2011 9:44:03 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RC2

Oil companies are famous for sitting on big finds for years, even decades. Obama is just now stealing a page out of Sarah Palin’s book going after them.

This issue is about Exon not even submitting a plan on how it intends to recover oil found 3-4 years ago.

Obama knows the only way to get re-elected is with major improvements in the economy, and he knows that ain’t happening under $4 a gallon gas.


18 posted on 08/18/2011 9:45:38 AM PDT by RC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I thought you would get a kick out of that


19 posted on 08/18/2011 9:47:18 AM PDT by PMAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: thackney

It sounds like the feds were demanding that EXXON present operational plans for drilling, while the feds were still in the process of re-writing the rules for deep-water drilling.


20 posted on 08/18/2011 9:47:18 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Oil Ping


21 posted on 08/18/2011 9:57:21 AM PDT by 4Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4Speed

You pinged me to the thread I posted?


22 posted on 08/18/2011 9:58:17 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: thackney

NO,
I set a bookmark (Ping) so that your article is logged to my Free republic list of commented articles.....for later reference (so one doesn’t lose sight of it)


23 posted on 08/18/2011 10:30:51 AM PDT by 4Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 4Speed

Try it as I described.

It goes into your ping list even if you leave the To: field blank.

What leaving it blank does not do, is add it to my ping list. I created the thread, I don’t need to be pinged back to it.


24 posted on 08/18/2011 10:36:16 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: thackney

It wouldn’t surprise me at all to see them give those leases to Brazil.


25 posted on 08/18/2011 10:40:47 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Oil Rising from Macondo Well: BP Hires Fleet of 40 Shrimp Boats to Lay Boom Around Deepwater Horizon Site

http://www.stuarthsmith.com/oil-rising-from-macondo-well-bp-hires-fleet-of-40-shrimp-boats-to-lay-boom-around-deepwater-horizon-site

Fresh oil is surfacing all over the northern quadrant of the Gulf of Mexico. Reports of slicks that meander for miles and huge expanses of oil sheen that look like phantom islands are becoming common, again. Fresh oil, only slightly weathered, is washing ashore in areas hit hardest by last year’s massive spill, like Breton Island, Ship Island, the Chandeleurs and northern Barataria Bay. BP has reactivated its Vessels of Opportunity (VoO) program to handle cleanup.


26 posted on 08/18/2011 12:11:59 PM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

That report looks like a lawyer trying to drum up some business.

Other sources report it quite differently.

http://fuelfix.com/blog/2011/08/18/bp-investigates-new-sheen-in-gulf/

Cheri Ben-Iesau, commander of Coast Guard District 8 in New Orleans, said a Coast Guard plane was doing flyovers Thursday afternoon of the Green Canyon site as well as the Macondo well and was awaiting an update.

But she said the agency had so far found no evidence at the Green Canyon site that the sheen was linked to a leaking well head or subsea pipeline, nor that oil was still spilling into the water.

She said the Coast Guard gets roughly 10,000 reports a year of surface sheens in the Gulf, some of which are caused by natural oil seeps on the sea floor. Given the hot weather, the sheens tend to dissipate quickly, she said.


27 posted on 08/18/2011 12:21:23 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

A statement from BP PLC placed the site of the sheen near two abandoned exploration well sites in the Green Canyon Block in the Gulf of Mexico, although its size and exact location wasn’t disclosed.

According to an online map published by the U.S. Department of Energy, the Green Canyon Block — a huge square-shaped area of water south of Louisiana — is south and west of the Mississippi Canyon Block where the Macondo well blew up.

A U.S. government official also said the area around Macondo was clear.

“They are not investing any sheens in the vicinity of the BP well,” Paul Barnard, Operations Controller for the New Orleans sector of the Coast Guard, told the AP on Thursday.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/08/18/national/main20093934.shtml


28 posted on 08/18/2011 12:24:45 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson