I have concluded that discriminating against individuals based on their sexual orientation in the context of civil marital rights is unjust. I have also concluded that treating the children of families headed by same-sex couples with lesser protections under the law than the children of families headed by heterosexual parents, is also unjust.
But O'Malley will gladly abort them for you. Just pass him a coat-hanger.
All Henry VIII wanted was a divorce.
He never supported same-sex marriage (and likely would have beheaded anyone who suggested it).
He got read the riot act.
So why does the gov. of Maryland (a much less powerful figure, to boot) get such a free pass?
How are CHILDREN treated differently?
Perhaps natural discrimination, as in “eewwww, did you hear Jason has 2 mommies?”, which pretty much everyone faces in life.
But I can’t think of any legal way children of !%#!#$s have “lesser protections”.