Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP May Block Payroll Tax Cut Extension That Obama Claims Could Save Up To 1 Million Jobs
TBI ^ | 8-22-2011 | Zeke Miller

Posted on 08/22/2011 6:45:17 AM PDT by blam

GOP May Block Payroll Tax Cut Extension That Obama Claims Could Save Up To 1 Million Jobs

Zeke Miller
Aug. 22, 2011, 9:32 AM

The Associated Press reports that congressional Republicans are considering allowing the payroll tax cut to expire at the end of the year — a move President Barack Obama says could cost up to 1 million jobs.

The tax, which funds Social Security, now stands at 4.2 percent for employees for 2011 — down from 6.2 percent — and GOP lawmakers, worried by rising deficits and the nation's booming debt, are gearing up to block extending the reduced rate through next year. The employer contribution remains at 6.2 percent.

"It's always a net positive to let taxpayers keep more of what they earn," said Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-TX), "but not all tax relief is created equal for the purposes of helping to get the economy moving again."

But their worry about debt and deficits did not prevent the lawmakers from demanding the continue the Bush tax cuts on wealthy Americans if they were to be extended for those with lesser incomes.

The payroll tax cut most benefits employees making less than $106,800 a year — including those whose incomes are so low they pay no income tax, but still have their payroll tax withheld from their paychecks.

Earlier this month Obama said Congress failing to extend the tax break and unemployment benefits "could mean 1 million fewer jobs and half a percent less growth."

Neither Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) or Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has taken a public position on the issue.

Obama says, the extension of the payroll tax cut would bring the average American family an additional $1,000 each year —

(snip)

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gop; jobs; politics; taxcuts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: MontaniSemperLiberi
Yeah, because we have like forever to get the deficit under control before the US treasury has to default, all paper assets become worthless, martial law is declared and the ensuing civil war starts.

That argument plays into Democrat Talking Point #2, as laid out in the article itself: "But their worry about debt and deficits did not prevent the lawmakers from demanding the continue the Bush tax cuts on wealthy Americans if they were to be extended for those with lesser incomes."

A case can be made that the payroll tax should never have been reduced to begin with, not for the reasons given. But now that has been, refusing to continue the cuts will play only to the Democrats benefit.

21 posted on 08/22/2011 7:10:48 AM PDT by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Blackandproud
I don't understand why we are blocking this. It helps play in to the notion that the GOP only cares about the rich.

The only thing I can guess is that we are using it as a negotiating chip for later battles.

22 posted on 08/22/2011 7:11:51 AM PDT by comebacknewt (Sheesh. Go away and stay away Newt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam

What most of the working-class doesn’t understand is that the working-class will pay no matter what taxes are divvied out. If the rich pay more, then the working-class makes less. If the rich pay less, then the working-class makes more. It’s as simple as that.


23 posted on 08/22/2011 7:12:57 AM PDT by Force of Truth (Intelligence and virtue are preferable in a candidate, but I'd much rather he or she be chinchy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

“Actually, the “payroll” taxes are essentially a flat tax.”

If it was a flat tax, somebody making $300K would pay 3 times as much as someone making $100K. But it’s not, is it?


24 posted on 08/22/2011 7:14:59 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook; blam
RE :”Sorry, I have to agree with 0bamao on principle with this one. We are TAXED ENOUGH ALREADY!!! The correct conservative response is NOT to raise taxes, but to CUT SPENDING!:

I have to disagree, People that pay NO Federal income taxes and reduced FICA (SS) taxes and are still entitled to SS benefits ARE NOT OVERTAXED when the current benefits are being paid by issuing new US debt to make up for it.

Please see : #11

This is just another popular handout that increases the chance that those 50% that do pay taxes will have to pay more in the future.

25 posted on 08/22/2011 7:15:16 AM PDT by sickoflibs (If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt

“I don’t understand why we are blocking this. It helps play in to the notion that the GOP only cares about the rich.”

Maybe the GOP only cares about the rich.


26 posted on 08/22/2011 7:16:20 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
SS is going broke fast. By cutting the payroll tax the demonrats will inflame those they have been trying to scare with looming cuts, the Gray Panthers, who vote in huge numbers.

The payroll tax has been cut for a while and I don't see those Grey Panthers inflamed much. But when people's paychecks go down by 2% on January 1st and the Democrats can say "We tried, but the Republicans blocked it" then I think we'll see a whole other group of inflamed individuals.

27 posted on 08/22/2011 7:17:34 AM PDT by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: blam

There is no way the GOP can block this extension and then argue to extend the current rates on the top two brackets. The GOP should push for spending cuts as an offset but need to be out front that they don’t want any tax rates going up from there current levels.


28 posted on 08/22/2011 7:18:46 AM PDT by Conservative Actuary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

Exactly. The tax break is on the wrong side, but we couldn’t have greedy employers getting a tax break now could we.


29 posted on 08/22/2011 7:19:13 AM PDT by oncebitten (Obama: "A Big Ole’ Hunk of Nothing on Two Thick Slices of Nada.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne
so these dumbasses are now going to be THE raise taxes party, instead of the cut spending guys...

pure gen-i-us...

talk about handing talking points to the commies AND throwing away what little leverage they had...

its to a point where neither side does anything right... even an idiot tends to get something right occassionally, just by statistical coincedence, unless of course its all going according to 'plan'...

ropes and pitchforks ??? anybody ??? or are we gonna just hafta wait in our holes to be slowly smothered under the pillow of fedzilla ???

30 posted on 08/22/2011 7:20:07 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
RE:“...many getting it pay NO Federal income taxes at all...”.... Except for FICA of course. But that’s NOT an income tax. It’s a payroll tax. And the difference to someone paying it is...?"

FICA tax is what allows Americans to demand their SS benefits under the argument that ;"I paid in". But now many that pay no income tax are not even being forced to pay that FICA/SS Federal tax, yet being told that they are still entitled to SS by both parties.

Those people you reference are the first to claim 'they paid in' and that taxes should be raised on the rich to make sure they 'get it back'.

31 posted on 08/22/2011 7:20:34 AM PDT by sickoflibs (If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo

Let it go and cut the federal income tax.


32 posted on 08/22/2011 7:22:08 AM PDT by italianquaker ( Mr Obama inherited an AAA rating and made it AA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gilbo_3; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; swain_forkbeard; Westbrook; blam
RE :”so these dumbasses are now going to be THE raise taxes party, instead of the cut spending guys...
pure gen-i-us...

No, In the end they will be the same as the GWB and Obama party, the ‘have your cake and eat it too’ party.

Yes, now YOU are entitled to SS benefits without paying the FICA taxes. Yes Virginia their is a free lunch. And lets demand even more since it is obviously free.

And what about the growing deficit (which current SS benefits adds to) making up for the FICA tax cuts ? Since the the freeloaders are being told they ‘paid in’ anyway, you know what they they will say when asked where to get the money for that....Guess,

33 posted on 08/22/2011 7:30:16 AM PDT by sickoflibs (If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

I agree! But just try to convince people that they themselves are paying that hidden part. The masses truly believe their employer is paying half their payroll tax and also paying for their unemployment insurance.

NOPE!

You the employee are paying ALL the costs of your employment plus a little more as profit for the company, otherwise you would not have a job.

I think if people truly understood how much government takes from them we would have replaced the government several times by now.


34 posted on 08/22/2011 7:32:42 AM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo

It is stupid to cut it and then borrow the money from China to put it back in the general fund. Only a moron would see that as a sound policy.


35 posted on 08/22/2011 7:33:38 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: blam
The payroll tax cuts were stealth Reparations, basically for those who pay no taxes BUT at least had to pay into Social Security. Now, the idea of them actually PAYING the tax, instead of getting a free ride in their no-skill jobs, they will whine and vote (as always) DEMOCORAT....but "tax the rich; they have more than they need..."

This is simply more Class Warfare by the Marxist Regime...

36 posted on 08/22/2011 7:33:59 AM PDT by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gilbo_3; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; swain_forkbeard; Westbrook; blam

At a minimum Republicans need to make some demands in return for extending these, keep in mind the REAL TAX CUTS expire in late 2012 after the election. Those are real tax increases.


37 posted on 08/22/2011 7:34:00 AM PDT by sickoflibs (If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo

I would leave the reduced rate of 4.2% but would remove the wage limit. In fact, may even go so far as to reduce both the employer AND employee percentages while removing the wage limit.


38 posted on 08/22/2011 7:34:59 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (Shaking My Head on a daily basis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam

the WH is trying to prevent another barganing effort by republicans. “too important to cut a deal” BS.

The republican can force Obama’s hand even more.


39 posted on 08/22/2011 7:35:32 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
If it was a flat tax, somebody making $300K would pay 3 times as much as someone making $100K. But it’s not, is it?

???

40 posted on 08/22/2011 7:39:31 AM PDT by Force of Truth (Intelligence and virtue are preferable in a candidate, but I'd much rather he or she be chinchy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson