Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Let’s Be Honest: We’re in a Depression, Not a Recession, And There’s No End In Sight
The New Republic ^ | 08/23/2011 | Judge Richard Posner

Posted on 08/23/2011 6:44:28 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

If the notion that we are merely living through the aftereffects of a mere “recession” that ended in 2009 sounds somewhat ridiculous, that’s because it is. If we were being honest with ourselves, we would call this a depression. That would certainly better convey both the severity of our problems, and the fact that those problems have no evident solutions.

The American economy currently has both a short-term problem and a long-term problem. The short-term problem is that the economy is depressed; it is growing more slowly than the population, with the result that per capita income is declining. The high rate of un- and underemployment is a factor, but is itself the product of other factors, having mainly to do with the reluctance of over-indebted consumers (over-indebted in major part because of loss of equity in their houses, the major source of household wealth) to spend, the reluctance of the impaired banking industry to make risky loans, and the reluctance of businesses to invest and to hire, which is due in part to weak consumer spending and in part to profound uncertainty about the nation’s economic future.

The roots of this catastrophic situations lie primarily, I think, in the incompetent economic management of the Bush administration and the Federal Reserve. The persistence of the depression, however, is due in part at least to surprising failures of the Obama administration—poor leadership, poor management, the sponsorship of incomprehensibly complex health care and financial regulation laws that have created widespread uncertainty that has discouraged consumption and investment, and the inability to explain the nature of the economy’s problems to the general public. These failures caused the stimulus enacted in 2009 to be botched in both in its design and its administration, resulting in discrediting of deficit spending as a response to depression.

(Excerpt) Read more at tnr.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: depression; recession; unemployment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Texas Eagle

PTL!


21 posted on 08/23/2011 7:38:09 AM PDT by ken21 (ruling class dem + rino progressives -- destroying america for 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Start here Obama...

Resign obama - We the people3
The schmuck stops here

22 posted on 08/23/2011 7:41:01 AM PDT by BobP (The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Radix
The garment industry in NYC is dead and buried. The Automobile Industry in Detroit done.
Guess who is responsible? Me?
I do not think so.

Extend that to all the manufacturing that has moved overseas, not to sell to the locals, who have no money, but just to get rid of their expensive employees - who happen to be their main customers - Oops!

It doesn't matter if Palin or Perry get in - things will get better to a degree, but until the factories come back, no amount of Green or Service jobs will bring us back up.

I've seen factories go from bustling to empty to razed to the ground to save property taxes.

Try rebuilding in this regulatory environment. I don't see any chance of that being rolled back. The Democrats implement Socialism, the Republicans only say that they can make it run more efficiently, and the downward spiral continues.

23 posted on 08/23/2011 7:41:31 AM PDT by Oatka ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: catman67

I concur. A weekly report on the total number of unemploymeny checks cut by state would tell the tale.


24 posted on 08/23/2011 7:55:44 AM PDT by WinMod70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Seems that economic "depression" is largely subjective, but the Wikipedia definition fits what we're now experiencing:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_depression

My advice when discussing it with liberals, go ahead and call it the "Obama depression," and chuckle when they try to tell you otherwise.

25 posted on 08/23/2011 8:03:44 AM PDT by Lou L (The Senate without a fillibuster is just a 100-member version of the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
The white president’s Great Depression is the black president’s minor economic downturn.

Wait a minute. I thought we were in a recovery.

Ah, well. If The Ministry Of Truth says we're in a Great Depression, then we're in a Great Depression.

Oh, by the way, what's the latest on The War In Eastasia? Or are we at War with Eastasia? Wait. I hear footsteps out in the hall. I'll check back later.

26 posted on 08/23/2011 8:07:31 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Riodacat
If you understand the difference between inflation and deflation you might come to the conclusion that you can have a blend of the the two that gives you the worst of both world. Inflation would be the higher priced goods that comes with the debasing of the currency [national inflation], could be coupled with a global work force and the internet that puts downward pressure on wages [international deflation].

My father's inflation is gone forever!

Back in the 1970s Honda had one car in the US, it was the Honda 1000 [today's civic], Datsun has the 240z and all other cars were made here. Most people had a Zenith TV, made here. Most people had ATT phone, made here. Most consumer goods were made in America. And when prices started to rise, my dad could go in to his boss and demand more pay to offset his cost of living increase. As Archie Bunker sang ... "Those Were The Days!"

Today, higher priced goods because of a fed that recklessly prints money, but no wage pressures to accompany the higher priced goods. Why? Because there are 1.2 Billion Chinese and 1.1 Billion Indians who will produce anything you want for a nickle and a bowl of rice per day. That is massive deflation. Cars, TVs, phones all made someplace else.

Americans demanded higher paying jobs and low priced goods ... can't have both.

Low priced goods come from low wages. Our demand for low priced goods caused manufacturing to seek low wages. That is where are jobs went! That is why you can have deflation in some aspects of our life and inflation in other aspects of our life.

27 posted on 08/23/2011 8:09:21 AM PDT by Why So Serious (There is no cure for stupidity!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: econjack

well said econjack, amazing that a guy who worked next to Friedman can be so far away.


28 posted on 08/23/2011 8:20:46 AM PDT by Why So Serious (There is no cure for stupidity!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lou L; All

How true is it that if we calculated the unemployment rate the way they did in the 1930’s, we’d have similar unemployment figures like they did back then?


29 posted on 08/23/2011 8:21:15 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Riodacat

Normally, when demand drops (say, because people are not spending), but supply stays high, the prices should drop. So, I can see why you might expect deflation, but you also have to take into account the variable of the money supply. As long as the Fed keeps printing money and increasing the money supply, they can offset the lack of demand and stave off deflation. Basically, they are devaluing the currency, so that it takes more dollars to have the same purchasing power, meaning prices are pushed back up.

This is why, although the economists talk about inflationary and deflationary cycles, we never see any drop in prices in the long term, but only a steady, constant inflation. The Fed has been printing money since it was created, so they are artificially maintaining long-term inflation and effectively taxing the wealth of the country away under the radar.


30 posted on 08/23/2011 8:26:19 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

You’re right that children will someday study our economic situation in school. However, unless leftists stop infesting the school system before then, the only thing they will take away from their study is: “Bush caused it, Obama tried to fix it, but the Tea Party held the economy hostage because they were terrorists”.


31 posted on 08/23/2011 8:32:01 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: WinMod70

Measuring unemployment by the checks going out is probably worse than the current method. A lot of people get denied and never get unemployment, and then you have it expiring anyways for people who are still unemployed. Also, it would totally exclude college and high school graduates who are just coming on to the job market and unable to find employment.


32 posted on 08/23/2011 8:35:32 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hey, how about this being an “Electronic Depression” imagine if all the people who are not working had to stand in line for their unemployment checks and food stamps. By going electronic the government has rid itself of the visual. Out of sight, out of mind!


33 posted on 08/23/2011 8:35:51 AM PDT by Why So Serious (There is no cure for stupidity!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Good point.


34 posted on 08/23/2011 8:42:09 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (When scraping bottom of political candidates barrel, the top layer of scum isn't better than bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Why So Serious

& where did all the homeless go now that a dem is president?

For all the inquiring minds since I don’t post very often .. I’m a beekeeper not a stoner


35 posted on 08/23/2011 8:42:42 AM PDT by LadyBuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
How true is it that if we calculated the unemployment rate the way they did in the 1930’s, we’d have similar unemployment figures like they did back then?

I don't know about how unemployment was calculated back in the 30's, but if you calculate it back the way it was in the early 90's you're getting pretty darn close to 30's unemployment rates. See the blue line below.

Alternate Unemployment Charts The seasonally-adjusted SGS Alternate Unemployment Rate reflects current unemployment reporting methodology adjusted for SGS-estimated long-term discouraged workers, who were defined out of official existence in 1994. That estimate is added to the BLS estimate of U-6 unemployment, which includes short-term discouraged workers. The U-3 unemployment rate is the monthly headline number. The U-6 unemployment rate is the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) broadest unemployment measure, including short-term discouraged and other marginally-attached workers as well as those forced to work part-time because they cannot find full-time employment.

Source: ShadowStats.com

36 posted on 08/23/2011 8:52:34 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (When scraping bottom of political candidates barrel, the top layer of scum isn't better than bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb
How do are the people working underground factored in? I'm sure alot of the unemployed are working under the table. Awhile back I read that Germanys underground economy was larger than their legit economy.

According to Bear and Stearns ours was supposed to have surpassed our legit economy by 2010. Never read a follow up.

37 posted on 08/23/2011 9:10:51 AM PDT by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench

I’m not sure. I’d be surprised to find that the underground employment surpassed legitimate employment, though, even factoring in the level of illegal alien employment, but that’s JMO, nothing factual to base it on.


38 posted on 08/23/2011 9:23:41 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (When scraping bottom of political candidates barrel, the top layer of scum isn't better than bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb
I was looking for that 2005 bear and stearns report. I found these. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/dec/9/new-underground-economy/

http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=10024

39 posted on 08/23/2011 9:30:07 AM PDT by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009; SeekAndFind
>>We will remain in this depression until Perry takes office in 2013<<

You’re going to have a serious problem with that contention.

No true Christian could possibly vote for Perry or anyone else who cozies up with Muslims. Here’s just one quote from Perry that will illustrate.

“It is a great honor to be in the presence of the Imam of 16 million Muslims around the world, a global humanitarian leader, a man of peace with a pluralistic vision for people around the world, His Highness, the Aga Khan, the 49th Hereditary Imam of the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims. Your Highness, on behalf of 23 million Texans, and over 600,000 thousand Muslims living in Texas, I extend our heartfelt appreciation for your 50 years of great international leadership. We are delighted to welcome you to the Lone Star State and participate in the celebration of your Golden Jubilee. I am also grateful to the many federal, state and local leaders in attendance tonight. By their presence, these special guests convey the profound respect that exists in the Western World for His Highness’ work and leadership.”

Now here is what scripture says about someone who gives credence to someone who “preaches another gospel”.

“But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.” Galatians 1:8-9

2 John 1:9 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. 10 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: 11 For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.

Notice the “partaker of his evil deeds”? Perry has put himself in a very dangerous position. If he is “partaker” then I would propose that anyone who gives him the same deference is also a “partaker”. I will not support Perry for that and other reasons. I would suggest that anyone who professes Jesus as savior be very careful about supporting anyone who gives Muslims the type of support that Perry does.

40 posted on 08/23/2011 9:41:13 AM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson