Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden Endorses 'One Child' Policy (No Surprise)
IBD Editorials ^ | August 23, 2011 | Staff

Posted on 08/23/2011 4:48:24 PM PDT by Kaslin

Population: The vice president gives a thumbs up to Beijing's policy of sustainable growth through forced population control. This is no gaffe. The White House endorses this policy. Just ask the president's science adviser.

We are used to the "mouth that roared" putting his foot in it. But Vice President Joe Biden's remarks at Sichuan University in China clearly embrace the progressive belief that people are a plague on the Earth — not its greatest resource.

"Your policy has been one which I fully understand — I'm not second-guessing — of one child per family. The result being that you're in a position where one wage earner will be taking care of four retired people. Not sustainable," Biden opined, embracing entitlement reform, Beijing-style.

Does Biden believe a government should be able to dictate to its people not only the number of children they have, but the sex? Is this how government deals with the problem of too many retirees and too few workers?

After all, the vice president said of dealing with the problem of debt and budgets, "maybe we can learn together from how we can do that."

"Really, Mr. Vice President? You're not second-guessing a policy that has resulted in untold numbers of forced abortions, forced sterilizations, outrageous fines or even jail time for families that dare to defy the law, and a gender imbalance crisis?" the Susan B. Anthony List said on its blog.

Besides helping to balance China's budget, Beijing's one-child policy helps cut those nasty C02 emissions.

Amnesty International reports that Chinese authorities forcibly sterilized 10,000 people in one city in Guangdong Province just last year. They will not have "unnecessary" children to burden Chinese society.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: abortion; biden; china; crackedheadclub; crackedheadjoe; eugenics; evilmales; feminism; ibd; lifehate; moralabsolute; moralabsolutes; onechild; onechildpolicy; populationcontrol; prolife; snag; sterilization; tyranny; unborn; womensrights

1 posted on 08/23/2011 4:48:25 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

hey barry, you have 2 kids.

Choose one.


2 posted on 08/23/2011 4:49:39 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Herman Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

as ambassadors of Planned Parenthood, they’re sort of obligated to do so.


3 posted on 08/23/2011 4:51:59 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

You 1st, Joe.

Joe Biden had 4 children. One of his daughters was killed in a car accident with his first wife. He has 3 children still living.

Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_children_does_Joe_Biden_have#ixzz1VtoDkNrO


4 posted on 08/23/2011 4:52:12 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Well, let's see . . . in Joe Bite-me's house, since he was the first born, brothers James, Francis, and a sister, Valerie, would have been slaughtered in an abortuary somewhere if he had his way . . . is that what the ass-hat is saying?

Do these libtards ever think before they speak? Do they ever think beyond their damn mouths?

5 posted on 08/23/2011 4:55:35 PM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

How about a One Term Policy for you and Barry?


6 posted on 08/23/2011 4:55:42 PM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Does Biden believe a government should be able to dictate to its people not only the number of children they have, but the sex?

Do we even have to ask? These wannabe dictators and Marxists would love to control the populace even more.

It works so well for China.

7 posted on 08/23/2011 4:56:12 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

‘“China has attempted to set itself up as the alternative model to democracy while savagely persecuting democratic activists, religious believers, Tibetans, Uyghurs, women who become pregnant without a ‘birth permit,’ snip

(Rep.) Smith chaired a comprehensive November 2009 hearing called “Thirty Years of the One-Child Policy” which detailed human rights violations including forced sterilizations, forced abortions and “gendercide” bias against girls resulting in alarming gender imbalance seen in many areas of China today. Computers in Smith’s office and that of another congressman active in human rights in China were hacked in 2006 and 2007, with strong indications that the hackers were based in China “

more http://chrissmith.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=255944


8 posted on 08/23/2011 5:07:45 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Is there a Roman Catholic parish whose priest admits this man to Mass?

There shouldn’t be.


9 posted on 08/23/2011 5:15:26 PM PDT by Mobties (Reduce the government footprint! Let the markets work!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

...BE ABOVE THE FIGHT...LEAVE THE KIDS OUT...


10 posted on 08/23/2011 5:15:54 PM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Did he then go out and shoot all of his kids beyond his first-born?

Come on Joe, don’t be a hypocrite. Save the planet you schmuck.


11 posted on 08/23/2011 5:17:48 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Joe Biden retracts his statement of ___________________ (fill in the blank)


12 posted on 08/23/2011 5:22:52 PM PDT by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This type of policy needs to be for unmarried women on WELFARE....


13 posted on 08/23/2011 5:25:39 PM PDT by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Vice president...thumbs up...his a$$.


14 posted on 08/23/2011 5:26:21 PM PDT by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pointsal

I merely put him on the horns of the dilemma he foists upon others as a result of his support of this policy.


15 posted on 08/23/2011 5:26:45 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Herman Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Joe “Isuzu” Biden strikes again.


16 posted on 08/23/2011 5:27:56 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (minds change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Another choice comment from the man with the room temperature I. Q.


17 posted on 08/23/2011 5:44:39 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“”The result being that you’re in a position where one wage earner will be taking care of four retired people. Not sustainable””

There’s that word again - UNSUSTAINABLE! They use it for everything except the U. S. debt.....

So let’s kill off more kids and have fewer young people supporting more old people??

1 + 1 = what in Biden’s book?


18 posted on 08/23/2011 5:54:49 PM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Statement by Texas Gov. Rick Perry on VP Joe Biden’s Comment Regarding China’s One Child Policy
Posted on August 23rd, 2011

AUSTIN – Texas Gov. Rick Perry today issued the following statement on Vice President Joe Biden’s comments regarding China’s one child policy:

“China’s one child policy has led to the great human tragedy of forced abortions throughout China, and Vice President Biden’s refusal to ‘second-guess’ this horrendous policy demonstrates great moral indifference on the part of the Obama Administration. Americans value life, and we deserve leaders who will stand up against such inhumanity, not cast a blind eye.”

19 posted on 08/23/2011 6:05:17 PM PDT by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

“Do we even have to ask? These wannabe dictators and Marxists would love to control the populace even more.

If Biden condones Red China’s actions, he certainly wouldn’t oppose such a law in our country - except for the elite, that is.


20 posted on 08/23/2011 6:49:01 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

No Surprise! Exactly.

Hillarycare/Obamacare/Totalitariancare has it covered on the backside. Compassionate totalitarianism, not in-your-face totalitarianism like Mao’s boys.

FUJB & FUBO


21 posted on 08/23/2011 7:08:18 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shield

Thanks for posting. HOORAY Rick Perry!


22 posted on 08/23/2011 7:09:57 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Well duh... does this not fit right in with the Left’s massive payoffs to their political supporters (unions or otherwise)?

There’s money in abortion. So proclaiming a “one child” policy a good thing is just another step towards forcing the issue.


23 posted on 08/23/2011 7:10:13 PM PDT by TheBattman (They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In Joe Biden’s case, It’s too bad his mom didn’t endorse a “No Child” policy.


24 posted on 08/23/2011 7:27:50 PM PDT by Iron Munro (Muslims who advocate, support, or carry out Jihad give the other 1% a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Just Like Ted Turner who has several kids, they endorse one child policy but only for others.


25 posted on 08/23/2011 9:25:47 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

not to mention all the beautiful little girls abandoned to orphanages.
They have figured out capitalism when it comes to selling off their own babies though.
They keep charging and charging whatever the wealthy westerners are willing to pay.


26 posted on 08/23/2011 9:35:22 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laweeks

this is manbearpig’s new pet cause too right? Teaching proper “fertility management” - just to women.
The chasing of massage therapists by crazed men is still fair game.

how many kids does algore have again?


27 posted on 08/23/2011 9:39:01 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife
how many kids does Algore have?

They have four children, Kristin, Sarah, and Albert III. Using the disgusting fuzzy logic of the abortophiles, Karenna, Kristin, Sarah, and Albert III, should be expendable and are a drain on the planets ecology . . . they should go.

Aren't libtards fun?????

28 posted on 08/24/2011 6:48:26 AM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: shield

A debate about when two becomes one

By BETSY HART

www.betsysblog.com

Last Modified: Aug 22, 2011 07:50PM

In 1958, at the age of 25, my mother gave birth to fraternal twin boys. She didn’t know she was having twins until after they were born, of course.

“Mrs. Canfield, did you know you had two babies?” was the question asked when she awakened from the anesthesia. My mom already had two children, ages 3 and 2. Rounding out this picture was a husband in sales, little help and not much money.

The stories about her and my dad stumbling around in the middle of the night with formula bottles trying to figure out which twin had already been fed when they both were still crying is the stuff of family lore.

And it only starts there. My mother described years of being so exhausted by 6 in the evening that all four children were in bed, lights out, by 6:15. I wish she had patented some of her ideas for keeping her toddler twins safely trapped in their cribs.

Then there was the time a twin climbed out the bedroom window of the split-level when he was about 4. Or was he pushed by a sibling? We’ll never know. He survived. Later, one twin broke the other’s arm in a bout of roughhousing. And on it went.

Five years after the twins came into the world, I was born. I like to think of myself as my mother’s consolation prize for having gone through all that. My brothers saw it differently. The twins told me when I was about 10, “Bets, we had a fight with (friend) Jim about who had the most annoying little sister. Don’t worry; we stuck up for you and you won!” Awww, nice.

I thought of all this as I read about the small but increasing phenomenon of selectively aborting healthy twin pregnancies down to one baby to make sure the pregnancy produces only one desired child. Such was the subject of an extensive New York Times Magazine story recently.

In “The Two-Minus-One-Pregnancy,” Ruth Padawer writes about a few of those who have chosen this route. Here’s one example:

“Jenny’s decision to reduce twins to a single fetus was never really in doubt. The idea of managing two infants at this point in her life terrified her. She and her husband already had grade-school-age children, and she took pride in being a good mother. She felt that twins would soak up everything she had to give, leaving nothing for her older children. ... Jenny desperately wanted another child, but not at the risk of becoming a second-rate parent. ‘This is bad, but it’s not anywhere as bad as neglecting your child or not giving everything you can to the children you have,’” Jenny was quoted as saying.

Really?

The essay recounts that while still somewhat ethically troublesome in the medical community and certainly more so — for now — in the population at large, “selective reductions” from twin pregnancies are on the rise in part because of the growing use of in-vitro fertilization, which often produces multiples. And more parents producing pregnancies on their own terms may be leading some to believe that life itself — theirs and their children’s — should be on their own terms, too. As Jenny put it, “somehow, making a decision about how many to carry seemed to be just another choice. The pregnancy was all so consumerish to begin with, and this became yet another thing we could control.”

I suppose this phenomenon is even less about the individual players involved than it is about a self-obsessed and, ironically, child-obsessed culture that in the very process of providing choices about life itself has minimized the awe we ought to have toward it.

Myself, I almost couldn’t finish the essay. I thought of my mother and my annoying older twin brothers. Two of my best friends now. I considered the four children born within 31/2 years to a young couple unprepared for those children in almost every way the world counts as significant. I felt her and my dad’s overwhelming love for us.

Most of all, I marveled at the sad irony of an increasingly sophisticated and advanced culture in which the gift of life itself is in some ways ever more precarious.

Scripps Howard News Service

http://www.suntimes.com/lifestyles/hart/7145995-417/a-debate-about-when-two-becomes-one.html?print=true


29 posted on 08/24/2011 9:54:26 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

30 posted on 08/24/2011 9:56:17 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

31 posted on 08/24/2011 10:02:41 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I hate to say this, but Biden was right.

When Chairman Mao took power in the late 04s, he was warned by Chinese scholars that China was in danger of being overpopulated if it kept on it's current growth trend. They were growing faster than their infrastructure or their ability to grow food. Their numbers were quite compelling and he actually started off his reign with fairly strict measures to encourage low birth rates.

Later in the 1950s, he believed that the USSR and the West were going to engage in an atomic war, and likely wipe each other out. He also concluded that if China was populous enough, it would survive any war by numbers alone, and would be able to resettle the remaining world after the dust settled.

Because of this, he pushed off a major propaganda campaign, calling for huge families as necessary and patriotic. This lead to the skyrocketing population increase that Chinese scholars were terrified of.

Sure enough, after Mao's death, the numbers were pretty bleak. China was heading towards mass starvation, inescapable poverty and social collapse. There just weren't enough resources in the country to support a culture where families just kept having kids until they has a boy or two. They had to do something to stabilize the numbers, and they did.

While there is some instances of sterilization and forced abortion, as a percentage that's extremely rare. The actual mechanism for enforcing the 1 child policy is social pressure and a hefty tax on any children over the first.

I spent some time in China, back when I was in the Army, and I spoke to a number of people about this. They uniformly don't like the 1 child policy, but also concede that Mao's policies had left no choice. It was either 1 child or starve.

32 posted on 08/24/2011 10:15:16 AM PDT by Steel Wolf ("Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master." - Gaius Sallustius Crispus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Your policy has been one which I fully understand — I'm not second-guessing — of one child per family. The result being that you're in a position where one wage earner will be taking care of four retired people. Not sustainable," Biden opined, embracing entitlement reform, Beijing-style.

Whereas our policy, on the other hand, it to seize the healthcare industry and then ration it by age, so that "wage earners" don't have to support as many retired people.

33 posted on 08/27/2011 3:05:22 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
WH: Biden finds China one-child policy 'repugnant'
34 posted on 08/31/2011 8:25:47 PM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

CINO Biden once again proves he does not read or follow the Bible!


35 posted on 08/31/2011 8:34:30 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson