Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study Finds Anti-Smoking Ads May Backfire
NBC Miami ^ | Tuesday, Aug 23, 2011 | Diana Gonzalez

Posted on 08/23/2011 4:57:35 PM PDT by nickcarraway

The intent is to shock smokers into quitting

The intent of the anti-smoking ads is to shock smokers into quitting. One ad shows fatty deposits oozing out of a 32-year-old dead smoker's aorta.

"Every cigarette is doing you damage” proclaims the announcer at the end of the ad.

They are definitely memorable, but are these ads simply turning smokers off?

Vanessa Vargas of Pembroke Pines has never smoked, but her husband does.

“They’re disgusting and hideous. He won’t change because of them. He just changes the channel. He thinks they’re gross,” she said of the ads.

Researchers at the University of Missouri studied the effects of these anti-smoking ads and found their scare tactics might actually backfire. The research was published in the Journal of Media Psychology.

Forty-nine participants were shown the ads and their emotional responses were measured. When they contained disturbing and threatening messages they had a defensive response, causing the smoker to avoid the image but not cigarettes.

Ed Gornik has smoked for 19 years and has tried unsuccessfully to quit.

He said he finds the ads “annoying.”

"Because I think if you pay attention to them and listen it kind of makes you think 'Really, is it propaganda?' I turn them off. I honestly do," he said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: pufflist; smoking; tobacco

1 posted on 08/23/2011 4:57:42 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

In Connecticut they frequently run anti-smoking ads with the smoker have a metal chimney cap on their head while doing daily task to try to get you to stop. I fast forward thru them or ignore it, and I don’t smoke.


2 posted on 08/23/2011 5:00:40 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
As long as we are going to have truth in advertising, shouldn't abortion clinics be forced to put photos of trash bags full of dismembered fetuses on their front doors?
3 posted on 08/23/2011 5:12:31 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Palin is coming, and the Tea Party is coming with her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The anti-smoking campaign has been a comedy of errors from the beginning. They should have been looking for safer alternatives from day 1; trying to demonize nicotine alone, while ignoring the role that other chemicals play in creating the addiction; trying to play one-upmanship it tying smoking to diseases where smoking only plays a peripheral role; insisting on lower nicotine content, which exposes smokers to more, not less, carcinogens; ignoring the positive health value of nicotine (thus not really understanding why some smokers suffer more than others, when trying to quit); Chantix.

This is just the latest in the list. Smoking is already known to be dangerous and is generally considered anti-social. Trying to overdo the message is just going to cause people to tune it out. People aren’t stupid. They know plenty of smokers who don’t suffer significant damage (especially at the age of the person in the ad), so they know that this is a rare and exceptional case.


4 posted on 08/23/2011 5:14:12 PM PDT by jjsheridan5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I started smoking by trying to emulate Sgt Rock. An a$$-kicking flu and a little more common sense is what helped me quit after 5 years, some 40 years ago. I think it was a gift from God.


5 posted on 08/23/2011 5:52:57 PM PDT by onedoug (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
My father quit smoking at the age of 50, he developed asthma. He lived to be 86. I have smoked for over 1/2 century and recently developed bronkitis, I think genetics has more of a effect on our health than smoking.

I use an inhaler when I get weezy, clears it up. Not bragging just stating facts...I am 72 and started smoking at 13.

6 posted on 08/23/2011 5:53:46 PM PDT by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Ed Gornik has smoked for 19 years and has tried unsuccessfully to quit.

What a wuss. Quitting is easy. Takes no skill, just will.

"But I really want one..waaaaaaah!"

7 posted on 08/23/2011 6:01:35 PM PDT by Huck (I don't believe there is just one God--humanity seems like the work of a committee to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
As long as we are going to have truth in advertising, shouldn't abortion clinics be forced to put photos of trash bags full of dismembered fetuses on their front doors?

YES.

8 posted on 08/23/2011 6:16:13 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I’ve always wondered if the politicans really wanted to get rid of smoking, despite all the rhetoric. Wouldn’t be surprised if they have psychologists design those ads to backfire (while, of course, looking quite legit). In the end, tobacco is too good a cash cow. Better to demonize the cigarette companies and bleed them (& the smokers) dry than to actually eliminate smoking


9 posted on 08/23/2011 6:31:50 PM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
They have been doing this in Canada for years. (see sample below)



The rate of smokers is practically the same in the two countries (and that also includes Canada's higher taxes).
10 posted on 08/23/2011 7:05:09 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (It's fun to play with your vision, but don't ever play with your eyes.-1970's PSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I’m not a smoker but I see this as just more Big Brother, Nanny Statism.

People are tired of federal government politicians and bureaucrats trying to micro-manage their lives.


11 posted on 08/23/2011 7:22:13 PM PDT by Iron Munro (Muslims who advocate, support, or carry out Jihad give the other 1% a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Great point! Don’t count on it though.


12 posted on 08/23/2011 8:33:53 PM PDT by Clump (the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson