As Rep. Lewis said: “they coming for the children”
He just had the “they” wrong. They be his own party.
I’m not surprised. This is not your grandfather’s Democrat party.
Terribly sad. Our whole nation owes an apology to Anita Bryant.
I can’t wait until they happen!
“....in their wisdom, they became as fools.”
Pedophilia is the caboose on the gay agenda train. Not really even that hard to predict.
I’m not shocked. Any country that would bend over backwards to give faggots, ragheads and messycan crimigrants a big sloppy kiss is capable of anything.
.
The Communist Takeover Of
America - 45 Declared Goals
http://www.rense.com/general32/americ.htm
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”
27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a “religious crutch.”
28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”
.
A standard leftist debating tactic is to use a word or phrase to mean one thing, assert things that are true of that meaning, redefine the word, and then assert that those same things are applicable to the new definition. For example, the term “gay” might be used to refer to a man who feels a stronger sexual attraction toward another man than to a woman. Leftists might then reasonably argue that it’s not right to discriminate against people on the basis of feelings which they are biologically predisposed to have. Indeed, they would be correct in that. After having made such an assertion, however, leftists would then redefine “gay” to refer to people who engage in open sodomy on park benches, and use the fact that it’s not proper to discriminate against “gay” people (by the former definition) it’s not proper to discriminate against “gay” people (by the latter).
Forced acceptance of pedophiles in the military will be the next step.
Prepare yourself for the “discovery” of a “pedophile gene”
and a chorus of pervs chanting that they were “born that way.”
We had to figure this and other things like this would be coming. Once the barn door was opened......
People will be allowed to marry and have sex with ashtrays in public before long, but it will be a crime to use them for their original intent.
While Rome burns......
(Sigh) A revelation that I STILL don’t have enough ammunition.
That’s not the end of the moral road.
We still have room for human sacrifice.
the right to death, to destruction of good growth and words, the right to euthanasia, abortion, homosexuality... and now wanting to commit suicide is not going to be considered a mental disease... watch em.
the right to death, to destruction of good growth and words, the right to euthanasia, abortion, homosexuality... and now wanting to commit suicide is not going to be considered a mental disease... watch em.
....
And it is so convenient to demoralize and destroy a country economicaly, and then make suicide not a mentaly treatable disease... Liberals want us to feel a pain, like the devil, so we can worship the power of the pain inflictor, when we can feel much more pain voluntarily for loved ones... so, whatever.
This has been going on for a long time.
You can trace this back to Kinsey, who was enormously influential among progressives back in the 40s and 50s, and was even a great favorite of Paul Tillich and other academic theologians.
This is what happens when a society embraces moral relativism. When there are no agreed upon moral absolutes and boundaries, then there are no real barriers to any type of behavior. Depravity can no longer be defined. Good and evil have no meaning - it is simply a matter of personal choice and taste (like ice cream).
This is what is happening (or rather, “has happened”) with the same sex marriage argument. If marriage is in the eye of the beholder, then it can be defined in any way one desires. If same-sex marriage is “ok”, then what possible argument can one make against polygamy or man/boy marriage?
People will say that pedophillia or bestiallity cannot be allowed because the young or animals cannot “choose” to participate and are therefore forced victims. It is not a very large step to make to crossover these qualms about pedophillia when you have doctors and phyciatric associations all making “scientific” decisions about these types of behaviors being “normal”. Then you get lawyers and “progressive” judges agreeing that these behaviors should be legally protected.
Only Heaven-sent spiritual revival can save our nation. Only God’s mercy keeps us from being destroyed. Pretty soon God will have to apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah if He doesn’t do something about the once great nation of the United States of America (then again, maybe His judgement has already begun). I pray it’s not too late.
Shoot. Shovel. Shut up. Don't forget the shut up part.
Once the liberals succeed in legalizing gay “marriage” (and virtually criminalizing opposition to it), the only question is whether their next push will be for legalizing polygamy, legalizing sex with minors, or legalizing some other kind of perversion.
Polygamy seems to have the inside track on normalization with TV shows like “Big Love” and “Sister Wives.” But on the other hand, there are lots of hot teenage girls and boys the perverts are dying to get a shot at.
In any case, almost all of the arguments made in favor of same-sex “marriage” could be made in favor of “plural marriage” or “intergenerational sex” so the libs won’t have to memorize a new set of talking points.
And of course the liberals will assure us that all of it will be completely consenual.