Skip to comments.SNOPES NO MORE
Posted on 08/27/2011 2:15:46 PM PDT by Sen Jack S. Fogbound
Snopes, Soros and the Supreme Courts Kagan
We-l-l-l-l now, I guess the time has come to check out Snopes!
Ya' don't suppose it might not be a good time to take a second look at some of the stuff that got kicked in the ditch by Snopes, do ya'?
We've known that it was owned by a lefty couple but hadn't known it to be financed by Soros!
Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros; a big time supporter of Obama!
In our Search for the truth department, we find what I have suspected on many occasions.
I went to Snopes to check something about the dockets of the new Supreme Court Justice, Elena Kagan who Obama appointed and Snopes said the email was false and there were no such dockets so I Googled the Supreme Court, typed in Obama-Kagan, and guess what?
Yep you got it; Snopes Lied!
Everyone of those dockets are there.
So Here is what I wrote to Snopes:
Referencing the article about Elena Kagan and Barak Obama dockets:
The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false.
I went directly to the Supreme Courts website, typed in Obama Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference to.
I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really shocking.
Thank You, I hope you will be much more truthful in the future, but I doubt it.
That being said, Ill bet you didn't know this.
Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship.
Now she may help rule on them.
Folks, this is really ugly.
Chicago Politics; and the beat goes on and on and on.
Once again the US Senate sold us out!
Now we know why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court.
Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama.
She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship.
He owed her big time.
All of the requests were denied of course.
They were never heard.
It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it?
Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket:
You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?
Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!
Check out these examples:
If you are not interested in justice or in truth, simply delete.
However, if you hold sacred the freedoms granted to you by the U.S. Constitution; by all means, PASS it ON!
There truly is tyranny afoot.
What do you guys think?
I think those documents are going to disappear so you’d better save and distribute copies.
The Snopes’ leftards are close-by in Santa Monica. Wiki pretty much stole their thunder.
I think alot of people know.
And I think he flubbed the Oath of Office intentionally, both he and Roberts knowing he’s ineligible.
Barack Hussein Obama is Chief Executive Officer of the United States, Inc.
Snopes is for dopes.
This is huge!!
I’ve never trusted Snopes. I heard long ago that it was owned by a left wing couple.
I don't know, it wouldn't suprise me if it were, knowing the unsavory characters involved.
But on a point of procedure, I think that posting a random anonymous spam email as "News" rather than in "Chat" or "Bloggers" is being a bit credulous. Do you believe everything you read in anonymous spam emails? :)
> Email | Unknown | Unknown
Understand, I'm not saying it's false, or true, or something else. I don't know. I'm just saying, apply some old fashioned FreeRepublic skepticism before getting too worked up. :)
Save and disseminate the documents or it will be “unsubstantiated rumors”. I have seen the memory hole in action before - it can and WILL be done unless widespread dissemination beforehand makes that impossible.
When even WorldNutDaily pulls an article, you know there’s absolutely no shred of truth to cling to.
These days, the truth is whatever the hell you want it to be.
No, not true. Go read the court dockets for yourself. None deal Obama’s eligibility.
Now, this does not discount that the nomination could have been payback for something, but this is not evidence of it.
Oh, wait.. WND scrubbed that article from their website and replaced it with: http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=187797
Where they say: “Editor's Note: An earlier version of this story incorrectly described a series of cases for which Elena Kagan represented the government as eligibility cases. Those cases, in fact, were a series of unrelated disputes pending before the Supreme Court and the references have been removed from this report. “
You're better off worrying about Kagan's ties to Obamacare.
I recall researching Snopes trashing a critic of Obamacare, Dr. Dave Janda.
Their sole source at that time was a graphic designer who bloggs and became a medical expert through research.
His blogg contained lots of contumely and cute comments like
* What shall I call the doctors comments, "essay? writing? screed?)"
* The doctor's résumé: "True, in the way that most résumés are true."
* After first section of the doctor's comments: "False, and poorly written to boot."
* After the next section: "Non-sequiturs and hyperbole are signs of weak writing. So far this is shaping up to be a pretty poor essay."
* "A red herring at best, an intentionally misleading lie at worst . . . almost-incoherent . . . wild, terrible lies"
and lots and lots more of the blogger's contempt and contumely because he wrote, "I'll be damned if I'm going to let people like [Dr. Janda] screw up necessary reform by lying."
(In fairness the blogger did permit critical comments from readers of his blog.)
That's how Snopes works?! I realized.
Today a cursory search of Snopes found what appears to be linking to wiki Answers.com. If the original link to the "medical expert" still exists I did not see it and I did not make an effort to track down the blogger/graphic designer/medical expert link.
Answers.com? Now another (Soros?) Snopes-like wiki-graffiti group is the defender against people who do not worship Soros' puppet Obama? IMO.
I’m bothered that the source of this information is “unknown”.
Outstanding detective work.
Snopes has been on my This-Smells-Really-Bad on my truth detection equipment for years, as I looked at these two old commies’ (oops I meant “progressives”) bullsh*t & deceit.
No one with any sanity will take credit for it. It’s crap that’s been debunked for about a year.
If the information about what's her name was false and admitted so by conservative publications then I wonder about the true purpose of this.
Perhaps you’re right in labeling it “Chat” or whatever instead of “news”.
I do not know if it is true and that’s why I made the vanity to get the other freepers to verify it.
I am bothered by it being “unknown” since I don’t know who is the source. A friend emailed it to me but no source cited.
I really don’t believe it unitl I know the source so it was in hope perhaps the freeper or freepers could point me in the right direction. I do not mormally fan out such stories until I can check it out.
“Kagan never filed anything with SCOTUS in any of the eligibility cases. She is listed on the docket because, when anyone sues the President in the Supreme Court, the Solicitor General is the one served with the papers. But Obama never responded to any of the SCOTUS filings in any of the eligibility cases (the Government often doesn't respond to SCOTUS filings that they think have no chance of being granted); the Court denied all of the requested stays, and denied certiorari in all of the cases, without receiving any response from Kagan on behalf of Obama.”
Is there any source other than Fox?
Today, I had a lefty whine that he is tired of hearing about how George Soros is satan, while Dick Cheney is obviously the evil one.
I strongly correct him, although it is like preaching to a dumb chicken.
A bit Greek to me. What’s a “docket file”? A description of the case? Wouldn’t all the judges get a copy of the exact same thing?
Snopes has always been for fools.
This has been posted here before with the “unknowns” known.
>> Whats a docket file? <<
The server entry on the case that contains every event, or action in the case in chronological order, date and time, and listing who was present for each entry.
I agree that Obama and Roberts colluded on the botched swearing in, but for what purpose(s). They could have just as officially made the correction in public and by using the bible. I always have in my mind the photo of Obama in Robert’s chambers acting like the SC was his ,Roberts up front with others appearing a bit tentative. There have been stories about Roberts having sizable investments worth a lot of money’ In any case I believe some day by some way all SC justices will be facing the judgement of Providence and the patriots of this Nation for lack of judicial and patriotic integrity.
If they did it in public, and they knew he was ineligible, that would amount to treason.
When was the last prosecution for treason? It seems to be one of those concepts that went out of fashion ages ago, like those dead white slave-owning racists who founded our nation. I mean, aren’t we all just enlightened citizens of the world now, with no time for such antiquated ideas as “constitutionality”?
Congress did not do their job when they confirmed Kagan.
But they rarely do meet their constitutional responsibilities.
Old news to me...this was one of the major reasons Kagan had to be stopped but the GOP blew it.
We were screaming to high heaven about the conflict...
“Ive never trusted Snopes.”
Me too. When they said that Barbara Wise’s death was perfectly ‘normal’ (you can look up her name - she knew a lot about Vince Foster and just happen to drop dead in her DC office), that was it for Snopes as far as anything related to politics. I still use them once in a while regarding non-political stuff (like verifying that those Nigerian E-Mails are not real...LOL).
Snopes claims that the story about the early radio star Uncle Don Carney is an urban legend and my father told me he heard it as it happened. Who do you think I'd tend to believe??
A reply from them, no. However, they did drop one of their urban myths, since I provided undeniable proof they were DEAD wrong about the “guy in the back seat” story they told.
Kagan simply acted in her official capacity as Solicitor General.
I personally don't see why taxpayer-funded resources were used to defend an individual on the eligibility issue. It's not a defense of the office, its actions or authority.
Snopes , Obam, & DNC Services Corporation are owned by Soros.
0bama is not a citizen..
I wonder what truth or fiction and the other urban legend websites say about the same subject of kagan and 0bama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.