Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SNOPES NO MORE
Email | Unknown | Unknown

Posted on 08/27/2011 2:15:46 PM PDT by Sen Jack S. Fogbound

Snopes, Soros and the Supreme Courts Kagan

We-l-l-l-l now, I guess the time has come to check out Snopes!

Ya' don't suppose it might not be a good time to take a second look at some of the stuff that got kicked in the ditch by Snopes, do ya'?

We've known that it was owned by a lefty couple but hadn't known it to be financed by Soros!

Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros; a big time supporter of Obama!

In our Search for the truth department, we find what I have suspected on many occasions.

I went to Snopes to check something about the dockets of the new Supreme Court Justice, Elena Kagan who Obama appointed and Snopes said the email was false and there were no such dockets so I Googled the Supreme Court, typed in Obama-Kagan, and guess what?

Yep you got it; Snopes Lied!

Everyone of those dockets are there.

So Here is what I wrote to Snopes:

Referencing the article about Elena Kagan and Barak Obama dockets:

The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false.

I went directly to the Supreme Courts website, typed in Obama Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference to.

I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really shocking.

Thank You, I hope you will be much more truthful in the future, but I doubt it.

That being said, Ill bet you didn't know this.

Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship.

Now she may help rule on them.

Folks, this is really ugly.

Chicago Politics; and the beat goes on and on and on.

Once again the US Senate sold us out!

Now we know why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court.

Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama.

She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship.

He owed her big time.

All of the requests were denied of course.

They were never heard.

It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it?

Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket:

You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?

Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!

Check out these examples:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm

If you are not interested in justice or in truth, simply delete.

However, if you hold sacred the freedoms granted to you by the U.S. Constitution; by all means, PASS it ON!

There truly is tyranny afoot.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; chat; crime; kagan; kagen; obama; palin; scotus; snopes; snopewebsite; soros; supremes; ussupremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: RoadTest

No one with any sanity will take credit for it. It’s crap that’s been debunked for about a year.


21 posted on 08/27/2011 3:23:59 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest
RE: the source of this information is “unknown”.

Here perhaps? Damn close

If the information about what's her name was false and admitted so by conservative publications then I wonder about the true purpose of this.

22 posted on 08/27/2011 3:35:54 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Perhaps you’re right in labeling it “Chat” or whatever instead of “news”.

I do not know if it is true and that’s why I made the vanity to get the other freepers to verify it.

I am bothered by it being “unknown” since I don’t know who is the source. A friend emailed it to me but no source cited.

I really don’t believe it unitl I know the source so it was in hope perhaps the freeper or freepers could point me in the right direction. I do not mormally fan out such stories until I can check it out.


23 posted on 08/27/2011 3:36:35 PM PDT by Sen Jack S. Fogbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
It's plainly false and was best summed up by Lurking Libertarian last year:

“Kagan never filed anything with SCOTUS in any of the eligibility cases. She is listed on the docket because, when anyone sues the President in the Supreme Court, the Solicitor General is the one served with the papers. But Obama never responded to any of the SCOTUS filings in any of the eligibility cases (the Government often doesn't respond to SCOTUS filings that they think have no chance of being granted); the Court denied all of the requested stays, and denied certiorari in all of the cases, without receiving any response from Kagan on behalf of Obama.”

24 posted on 08/27/2011 3:40:14 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

Is there any source other than Fox?


25 posted on 08/27/2011 3:45:29 PM PDT by safetysign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
Is there any truth to this? It wouldn't surprise me if it is as George Soros seems to be everything Obama1 What do you guys think?
Wait a sec, while I check Snopes....Nope they say it isn't true LOL.

26 posted on 08/27/2011 3:54:44 PM PDT by conservaterian (Sarah/DeMint '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

Today, I had a lefty whine that he is tired of hearing about how George Soros is satan, while Dick Cheney is obviously the evil one.

I strongly correct him, although it is like preaching to a dumb chicken.


27 posted on 08/27/2011 4:29:58 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Fight for Liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

A bit Greek to me. What’s a “docket file”? A description of the case? Wouldn’t all the judges get a copy of the exact same thing?


28 posted on 08/27/2011 4:48:48 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution! (See my freep page) [rednecks come in many colors])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

Snopes has always been for fools.


29 posted on 08/27/2011 4:52:48 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Sarah Palin - 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

This has been posted here before with the “unknowns” known.


30 posted on 08/27/2011 4:55:55 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Sarah Palin - 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

>> What’s a “docket file”? <<

.
The server entry on the case that contains every event, or action in the case in chronological order, date and time, and listing who was present for each entry.


31 posted on 08/27/2011 4:59:30 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Sarah Palin - 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: djf

I agree that Obama and Roberts colluded on the botched swearing in, but for what purpose(s). They could have just as officially made the correction in public and by using the bible. I always have in my mind the photo of Obama in Robert’s chambers acting like the SC was his ,Roberts up front with others appearing a bit tentative. There have been stories about Roberts having sizable investments worth a lot of money’ In any case I believe some day by some way all SC justices will be facing the judgement of Providence and the patriots of this Nation for lack of judicial and patriotic integrity.


32 posted on 08/27/2011 4:59:46 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: noinfringers2

If they did it in public, and they knew he was ineligible, that would amount to treason.


33 posted on 08/27/2011 5:04:37 PM PDT by djf (One of the few FReepers who NEVER clicked the "dead weasel" thread!! But may not last much longer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: djf

When was the last prosecution for treason? It seems to be one of those concepts that went out of fashion ages ago, like those dead white slave-owning racists who founded our nation. I mean, aren’t we all just enlightened citizens of the world now, with no time for such antiquated ideas as “constitutionality”?

/sarc


34 posted on 08/27/2011 5:11:36 PM PDT by workerbee (We're not scared, Maobama -- we're pissed off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

Congress did not do their job when they confirmed Kagan.

But they rarely do meet their constitutional responsibilities.


35 posted on 08/27/2011 6:05:33 PM PDT by Iron Munro ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you." John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

Old news to me...this was one of the major reasons Kagan had to be stopped but the GOP blew it.

We were screaming to high heaven about the conflict...


36 posted on 08/27/2011 6:07:37 PM PDT by surfer (To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll

“I’ve never trusted Snopes.”

Me too. When they said that Barbara Wise’s death was perfectly ‘normal’ (you can look up her name - she knew a lot about Vince Foster and just happen to drop dead in her DC office), that was it for Snopes as far as anything related to politics. I still use them once in a while regarding non-political stuff (like verifying that those Nigerian E-Mails are not real...LOL).


37 posted on 08/27/2011 6:16:03 PM PDT by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

bfl


38 posted on 08/27/2011 6:21:12 PM PDT by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

For later


39 posted on 08/27/2011 6:32:38 PM PDT by TinCan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
Claiming to be able to debunk every wrong idea which ever comes down the road as Snopes does is close to a claim of omniscience and only God is omniscient.

Snopes claims that the story about the early radio star Uncle Don Carney is an urban legend and my father told me he heard it as it happened. Who do you think I'd tend to believe??

40 posted on 08/27/2011 7:22:09 PM PDT by steveshoveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson