Elections expert who’s called every presidential race since ’84: Obama will win

Hotair ^ | 08/30/2011 | Allahpundit

[hsalaw]

4. Major domestic-policy changes in his first term

Right. ObamaCare, millions of new regulations strangling the economy, and a crippling debt. Those are changes all right, but they're huge losers for the Obozo.

[Red Badger]

5. No social unrest

Not yet,anyway........

7. No major foreign-policy failures

No successes, either.......

8. Major foreign-policy achievements in his first term (killing Bin Laden)

He didn’t kill Bin Laden, Seal Team 6 did.........

9. Little charisma by his likely opponent

People are soooo over that one, now........

[Jeff Gordon]

Oh well. I guess that we can all take a pass on voting if the Chicago fix is in.

[A message]

NO scandals???? Is this guy been living under a rock??????

Gun Walker, if MSLSD and the other kiss 0bama's butt media don't report on it apparently it is not a scandal.

[traderrob6]

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSLogKNloGULOVqMM91jU_7DmtckMdK9DdT88D7kdLO12iA_iJquA One word....TOOL.

[The Duke]

If America wants to be a nation of beggars than I can think of no better President for American than Obama. But I, for one, am not going under the yoke.

[traderrob6]

One word....TOOL.

[Southside_Chicago_Republican]

1. No contested primary — so far
2. Incumbency — check
3. No third-party candidate — so far, but that could be to his benefit, depending on who might run.
4. Major domestic-policy changes in his first term — a lot of stuff a lot of people don’t like
5. No social unrest — huh?
6. No major scandals — just wait
7. No major foreign-policy failures —things are not that peachy.
8. Major foreign-policy achievements in his first term (killing Bin Laden) — OK, but who is talking about that anymore?
9. Little charisma by his likely opponent — he must be assuming Romney, and he’s probably wrong on that too.

[aruanan]

Elections expert who’s called every presidential race since ’84: Obama will win

So he miscalled the 1980 election?

[tophat9000]

A STNG reference?

[AFreeBird]

Can’t bat 1000 forever.

[P.O.E.]

The problem is where do you go?

Sorry. We aren't accepting any more applications at this time.

[SoJoCo]

I look through those 9 counts and most of them could have been applied to Herbert Hoover, too. And look what happened to him.

[Williams]

Tea part demonstrations can be viewed as “social unrest” and No foreign policy failures?? Gee losing Pakistan, Iranian nukes, losing Egypt, alienating many allies, ignoring generals’ advice in Afghanistan, abandoning Iraq, ...., there is a long list.

[sourcery]

Obama has as much chance at being re-elected as Herbert Hoover. And for the same reasons. And that's based on my own professional expertise, which is considerable. I earn my living by being right about social mood trends.

[rockvillem]

HE COULDN’T EVEN PREDICT HIS OWN DEFEAT.

This. A million times this! As a Marylander I know the landscape here - if he's that far to the left of Ben Cardin (for crying out loud) then he is CRAZY left wing. Crazy. Of COURSE he's trying to launch a disinformation campaign to try to get the Marxist Obama re-elected. Of COURSE.

[aruanan]

One word....TOOL.

That's not the word that came to my mind.

[traderrob6]

But, excellent toupe.

[bereanway]

Handy that he came up with this list in ‘81 as opposed to say...’79. Several of those 9 affirmatives for Hussein are more than a little suspect.

If Perry gets the nomination he’ll beat 0zer0 like a red-headed stepchild. He is the anti-0bama.

[Williams]

The “No Third Party Candidate” one is backwards because many threatened 3rd parties would hurt the republicans.