Skip to comments.NASA warns 'risk of losing' space station rising
Posted on 08/30/2011 7:47:13 PM PDT by Nachum
click here to read article
The list, ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
Just great. Not only dump the shuttle but cancel its replacement and pay the Russians to get us there.
That worked out great.
I know it cost alot but is it really worth anything?
First it was the F-22.
Then the Shuttle. Now the space station.
does the science justify that enormous cost? Maybe those billions would be better spent on researching cure for cancer or something
If they lose that station after the billions upon billions and blood sweat and tears to get it there - they are in deep, deep kimchie.
:: snort ::
No, it's not "insignificant."
They just said they could keep it going indefinitely without crew on board, now they say they may very well lose it without anybody on board? Is anybody able to make up their minds?
Man, it’s too bad we don’t have some sort of reusable spacecraft that could make regular trips to service the ISS. It could be made like a plane, and we’d launch it like a rocket and let it glide back to Earth. A “Space Plane” or, even better a “Space Shuttle”!! Wouldn’t that be cool! (Sarcasm is dripping, no tag required ;-)
Oh yeah, who's fault is that?
“Screw those commie bastards, and screw their wussy little space station.”
The shuttle program turned out to be nothing more than a very dangerous and extremely expensive and inefficient way to launch satellites. And the ISS? Totally useless to science and space exploration.
Would somebody pleas tell me what the ISS is good for?
Has its existence produced any worthwhile scientific knowledge?
Is there anything that has been discovered as a result of the ISS?
Can its continued existence be justified?.........
What do you think they're doing up there? Getting a tan?
See post #15.
Well, that's actually some good news for this fiasco. NASA is in no shape to boost anything, and certainly not Islamic esteem :-)
Good question. Its kind of like Porkulus,
Expensive,worthless and going down in flames.
See post #15.
They all have special suits so that if they have to evacuate they can survive until the next spacecraft comes to pick them up.
That’s hilarious. /sarc
I stopped reading when I got to ‘BUZZ LIGHTYEAR’............
Oh you poor thang.
How much basic research won’t be done because of all the capital sucked up by this super duper science platform.
Cancer research? Please,,, The cost of the Space Station has been around 100 billion, spread over 30 YEARS. Thats about 10 months of the war in Iraq.
Or try about 18 months of the dept of education budget.
There are legitimate things to criticize NASA for; woman astronauts with the frizzy hair and no sense to put it in a ponytail, Hansen and his global warming Jihad, always having to carry a foreigner and being terrified of ever seeming “American”, the muslim outreach program,,,etc. But the Space Station is about the only thing they’ve done right lately. And there is nothing but a pittance to save by canceling it.
Space exploration and experimentation is great, but the countries of the world are without the means to support it financially.
Make one last trip and push it out of orbit to sit until we can once again do it justice or use its parts for the next space station.
Looks to be primarily PHD welfare with a sprinkling of ethnic and cultural diversity to round it out.
How do they evacuate with no one launching? Do they open the door and parachute out? lol
Thank you, Obama. Without you we might have kept the space shuttles going for a couple more years until a replacement was ready.
Huh? "Out of orbit" means reentry into the atmosphere, as in gone, baby, gone.
If we can re elect him; we might have our technological abilities back to the 1890’s at least.
Maybe we can bring back steam locomotives?
Maybe the shuttles could have a few flights left in them
Letting central planners decide what basic research deserves funding (and what doesn’t) is no more effective than industrial central planning.
The great majority of those experiments have to do with the effect of microgravity on biology (human, ultimately) or on processes (e.g. agricultural; medical) performed in support of human existence in space.
If you don’t put humans in space you don’t need all that data.
The space program was the ultimate display of American greatness during the Cold War. Barack Obama is not only not a believer in American Exceptionalism - he is a militant believer in American Unexceptionalism. To him, the space program is an arrogant display. And America needs humbling.
The man found trillions to dig ditches and fill them again. The only things he cuts are defense - and the space program.
Much of it is corporate, and the companies pay top dollar. My company considered it until the realization that the lack of shuttle access pushed the timeline way back.
There are two Soyuz spacecraft docked.
They are all in various states of disassembly as we speak.
So man is to stay on Earth forever?
It was the best of years and it was the worst of years.
Otherwise I have several locations where I’d like them to drop the station if it is at all possible for NASA to control its decent.
A ton of it is corporate. My company considered it at one time.
Hardly a Commie conspiracy.
Raise your hand if you were lucky enough to have one of the “retired” shuttles come to your home town museum? Oh boy, oh boy! Aren't you lucky!
You ought to have a tear in your eye like the indian from the ‘70s PSA commercial looking at cigarette butts in the river next to his canoe.
Never deal with the Russians. They’re corrupt through and through, and given the choice between being successful at something themselves, or preventing America from being successful at it, they’ll choose the latter every time. They’re like Arabs/Muslims in that regard.
It seems like every time a new, wet-behind-the-ears president comes along, we have to learn that lesson all over again from scratch, at great harm to our national defense and scientific progress, and at great expense to the taxpayer. Veeeery discouraging. Ronald Reagan is the only president in recent memory to have known it: Don’t enter into any “cooperative” deals with the Russians.
wonder what this will do to muslim self esteem, though.
What Reagan said was "Trust, but verify."
Hardly a Commie conspiracy.
I don’t understand that comment. Could you expand on it?