Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Demand side economics debunked
Examiner ^ | 24 Aug 11 | Dan Poole

Posted on 09/03/2011 7:04:42 AM PDT by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: trailboss800
If supply side worked, garbage and criminals would be in great demand and would be considered valuable.

Oh wow, I'll bet the supply siders have never thought of this angle before. Their theory is clearly doomed.

21 posted on 09/03/2011 10:53:24 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: trailboss800

The Heritage Foundation paper linked to early in this article also says the Keynesian theory is based on demand.


22 posted on 09/03/2011 11:29:46 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: trailboss800
Demand theory states that if something is being demanded, a supplier will come forward and a mutual price will be agreed on. Supply side econ states that if you produce enough of something, it will eventually be demanded.

That's a unique definition, did you make it up yourself?

23 posted on 09/03/2011 11:38:31 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Demand side economics could work if the government were spending a surplus, but when it has to borrow in order to spend, it is destined to fail. Government borrowing sucks investment capital out of the economy in order to pour stimulus money into the economy. This is just as effective as dipping water out of the deep end of a swimming pool and pouring it into the shallow end in order to raise the overall level of water in the pool.


24 posted on 09/03/2011 11:40:53 AM PDT by csmusaret (The only borders Obama has closed is a bookstore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret

If they had a surplus then they were taking too much out of the private sector and simply should reduce taxes. That would do more than anything else they could do.


25 posted on 09/04/2011 12:21:38 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DB
If they had a surplus then they were taking too much out of the private sector and simply should reduce taxes. That would do more than anything else they could do.

Of course it would! But they don't get to do their social engineering that way!

26 posted on 09/04/2011 6:29:26 AM PDT by Bigun ("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson