Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeronL

Not charged with any crime because “there was no victim”, since nobody saw it happen.

I’ll use that next time I get caught speeding on a desolate street. I’ll ask who the victim was, since there was nobody around to get endangered by my speed. They’ve got these cameras to catch people who are speeding, but I hope they have a wide-angle view because if the rationale of the police chief holds up, they’d have to prove that there was anybody within (what distance?) of the person speeding. At that rate we won’t need cops, we’ll need referees to call each play.

And it would have to be a victim other than the person committing the crime, using that rationale also, since the gal on the hood would be a victim of the cop’s indecent exposure and the cop would be a victim of the slut’s indecent exposure if participants in the crime were allowable as “victims”. So there could be no victim in a person’s failure to use a seat belt also.

The rationale used could call all law enforcement arrests into serious question.


18 posted on 09/03/2011 4:17:51 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

victim= taxpayers who paid him and trusted him with that job and anyone who watched that video. ick. Mental anguish should be millions.


22 posted on 09/03/2011 4:22:02 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson