Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Postal Service Struggles to Stay Solvent, and Relevant (may shut down this winter)
NY Times ^ | Sept. 4, 2011

Posted on 09/04/2011 4:49:11 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

The United States Postal Service has long lived on the financial edge, but it has never been as close to the precipice as it is today: the agency is so low on cash that it will not be able to make a $5.5 billion payment due this month and may have to shut down entirely this winter unless Congress takes emergency action to stabilize its finances.

“Our situation is extremely serious,” the postmaster general, Patrick R. Donahoe, said in an interview. “If Congress doesn’t act, we will default.”

In recent weeks, Mr. Donahoe has been pushing a series of painful cost-cutting measures to erase the agency’s deficit, which will reach $9.2 billion this fiscal year. They include eliminating Saturday mail delivery, closing up to 3,700 postal locations and laying off 120,000 workers, nearly one-fifth of the agency’s work force.

The post office’s problems stem from one hard reality: it is getting squeezed on both revenue and costs.

As any computer user knows, the Internet revolution has led to people and businesses sending far less conventional mail.

At the same time, decades of contractual promises made to unionized workers, including no-layoff clauses, are increasing the post office’s costs. Labor represents 80 percent of the agency’s expenses, compared with 53 percent at United Parcel Service and 32 percent at FedEx, its two biggest private competitors. Postal workers also receive more generous health benefits than most other federal employees.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: postal; postalservice; postoffice; usps
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last
To: Ronin

Yes, some people do use the post office. We have an internet book business and our best shipping rates come through the USPS. We used to do a high volume through eBay and shipping was all through the post office. This would be terrible for us. I do some online bill paying, but not everything. I depend on the mail for quite a bit in our lives.


21 posted on 09/04/2011 5:00:50 PM PDT by indubitably
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Junk mail is the majority of the mail, largely because bulk mail shipping rates are effectively a government subsidy for direct mail marketers.


22 posted on 09/04/2011 5:01:13 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
"They include eliminating Saturday mail delivery, closing up to 3,700 postal locations and laying off 120,000 workers, nearly one-fifth of the agency’s work force."

If only we could get the rest of the Federal Government to follow in a similar manner.

23 posted on 09/04/2011 5:01:21 PM PDT by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
They should close down. These days they mostly subsidize advertisers by delivering 2 & 3 rd class mail to any address in the country for ridiculously low rates.

Let Fed Ex & UPS make a profit with those conditions imposed upon them.

24 posted on 09/04/2011 5:03:58 PM PDT by Radix ("..Democrats are holding a meeting today to decide whether to overturn the results of the election.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I live out in a rural area and a great number of poor folks and the elderly use the post office. Ours is in danger of closing, forcing residents to drive up to 15 miles to get to the nearest post office.

Not fair to them.


25 posted on 09/04/2011 5:04:17 PM PDT by Armedanddangerous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

UPS = USPS


26 posted on 09/04/2011 5:04:33 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Obama is the least qualified guy in whatever room he walks into.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Will we know the moment

“But it won’t survive the unions.”

That sums it up nicely, in a nutshell.


27 posted on 09/04/2011 5:04:54 PM PDT by Ernie Kaputnik ((It's a mad, mad, mad world.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Drastically raising the price of postage will likely decrease revenue to UPS.


28 posted on 09/04/2011 5:04:54 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: political1

That explains what happened to the one at my post office.

I can only guess as to when they get rid of the self-postage machine.


29 posted on 09/04/2011 5:06:11 PM PDT by VanDeKoik (1 million in stimulus dollars paid for this tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

agree. the PO is one of the things fedgov is supposed to do. Get rid of the depts of education and energy first.


30 posted on 09/04/2011 5:11:12 PM PDT by JPJones (Frodo Lives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
Does anyone still use the post office for anything important

You'd be surprised. Millions of eBay sellers, Amazon book sellers, and other small online sellers, use USPS First Class Parcel rates, Media Mail, and Priority Mail Flat Rate. They depend on these sales for much and, in many cases, all of their income. UPS and FedEx are much too expensive for parcels of 2 lb or less. Close the Post Office and you will add not only the postal workers, but also these sellers, to the growing list of unemployed.

31 posted on 09/04/2011 5:12:45 PM PDT by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

Are the people who sort the mail worth $90K/yr? Have you noticed how many Marcedes and BMWs in the post office worker lot?

Pray for America


32 posted on 09/04/2011 5:13:36 PM PDT by bray (Palin is hated by the establishment of both Parties. Winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

A serious question to you. If the public sector can’t afford to provide for pensions and benefits, how can the private sector? If the private sector doesn’t do this or provide for these functions in their wage base what is the alternate consequence?

Without some kind of health plan, disability plan and retirement savings program we end up with people for whom sickness resulting in a long or short term inability to work or old age is more-or-less a death sentence. Certainly all of these things can be provided by some kind of private insurance programs but it still has to be paid for.

Many people in the labor class are taking home a just adequate living wage. Others are more prosperous but still probably do not generate enough excess cash to provide the benefits they need.

Fedex manages much of their cost by an army of part-time workers who have no benefits.

For there to be any savings in labor cost as a result of privatization benefits have to be fewer or somehow less costly. So, the question is, by what means are labor costs cut and with what long term consequence to the general well being. If one does not care about this any solution is acceptable.


33 posted on 09/04/2011 5:15:17 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Half the people are below average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Start selling Green Stamps...


34 posted on 09/04/2011 5:16:53 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Like a parasite, unions will eventually always kill the host.

The postal workers have a choice. Allow their hours and benefits to be adjusted or join the ranks of the unemployed.

There are many things the post office can do, but if they do not control the cost of labor, then nothing else will work.


35 posted on 09/04/2011 5:17:05 PM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (California does not have a money problem, it has a spending problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

If they let it die, and let it go private, somebody will figure it out and make money off of it.

The country will go on without the postal service, after some time of adjustment.

Then they need to do the same thing with every other inefficient, union-bloated agency that the Fed Govt supports.


36 posted on 09/04/2011 5:17:05 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Still the New York Times continues to mail copies of it's newspaper at preferred rates (heavily cross subsidized by other mailers) all over the world.

Do you have any statistics about how many mail subscriptions the NYT still has or are you just blowing smoke again?

ML/NJ

37 posted on 09/04/2011 5:17:53 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

There are other issues at play here that are out of the control of the postal service. They can’t raise rates as needed plus the feds forced them to prefund retirement some 75 years ahead.

They’d be a lot better off if they could run it like a business but they’re in what used to be a unique position of being tied to the federal government in ways they shouldn’t be.

As far as their own fault is concerned, there are the unions, the fact that they seem to be overstaffed at the administrative levels and more service than is necessary which means excess staff.

If it were up to me I would cut Wednesday and Saturday delivery. I would allow them to set rates as needed. I would eliminate door to door service in the city and and rural delivery within a mile of the post office.

My local post office only has about 200 PO boxes and its in a rented building. Meanwhile, 25 yards away a brand new township owned building sits empty and I would make a deal with the township to move there and expand. There are another 1500 or more people within a mile of the post office on a rural route and I would move their delivery to the new PO.


38 posted on 09/04/2011 5:18:06 PM PDT by cripplecreek (A vote for Amnesty is a vote for a Permenant Democrat majority. ..Choose well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
I find it funny that their first thought is how to "raise revenue" instead of how to bust this fat, bloated union and the insane contract fluff in order to bring their operating expenses inline with reality.

Looks like the Dems are about to lose another chunk of their taxpayer subsidized voter base.

39 posted on 09/04/2011 5:18:18 PM PDT by FunkyZero ("It's not about duck hunting !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Their tv commercials say they’re self-sustaining and not part of government.

Then they have their same people say in Congress doesn’t save them they’re toast.

This is the kind of agency we’re dealing with here.

Is every freaking government agency just a bunch of lying shell-gamers? Damn.


40 posted on 09/04/2011 5:19:02 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson