Skip to comments.Nature Journal of Science Discredits Man-made Global Warming
Posted on 09/06/2011 5:31:32 PM PDT by saganite
Nature Journal of Science, ranked as the worlds most cited scientific periodical, has just published the definitive study on Global Warming that proves the dominant controller of temperatures in the Earths atmosphere is due to galactic cosmic rays and the sun, rather than by man. One of the reports authors, Professor Jyrki Kauppinen, summed up his conclusions regarding the potential for man-made Global Warming: I think it is such a blatant falsification.
The research was conducted by CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, which invented the World Wide Web, built the multi-billion dollar Large Hadron Collider, and now has constructed a pristinely clean stainless steel chamber that precisely recreates the Earths atmosphere. The climate study involved scientists representing 17 of Europes and Americas premiere research institutes. The results demonstrate that cosmic rays promote the formation of molecules that can grow and seed clouds in the Earths atmosphere; the temperatures then fall as the density of the clouds increase. Because the suns magnetic field controls how many cosmic rays reach Earths atmosphere; the sun determines the temperature on Earth.
Nature Journal has been the holy-grail of scientific research publication since it was established in England in 1869. Its original editors gave the title to their new scientific journal in celebration of a line by British poet William Wordsworth: To the solid ground of nature trusts the Mind that builds for aye. Because research scientists are the primary audience this most prestigious of journals, the magazine strives to retain its stamp of approval as the pinnacle of scientific credibility for original research. Nature first introduced its readers to X-rays, DNA double helix, wave nature of particles, pulsars, and more recently mapping of the human genome.
(Excerpt) Read more at biggovernment.com ...
BREAKING NEWS:cAl Bore Deeply Deepressed.
In other news.... Al Gore spontaneously combusted.
Time for the EPA TO END NOW.
They no ;onger can justify stealing taxpayer money for their lying BS hairbrain ideas.
Thank you Prof. Jyrki, for making a beefy case against the enviro-wieners.
Did he give back all the money he stole in his extortion scam?
If Congress can do what they’re doing to Roger Clemmens why not investigate AlGore.
I’m actually surprised. Nature has been solidly in the tank for the “global warming”, and then the rebranded “global climate change” scam since the beginning.
It’s interesting to note that - throughout all of this climate change malarky - no has noted that Gore has perhaps the weakest intellectual credentials of virtually anyone in the country.
The man is dumb. Check out all his attempts at getting a degree - in even marshmallow subjects.
He’s a blithering idiot.
This is not going to be the final study, any more than any other scientific paper is the final one. I know some scientists are questioning the peer review process on this paper, but if they really have questions, they can write better papers with more information.
“... that proves the dominant controller of temperatures in the Earths atmosphere is due to galactic cosmic rays and the sun, rather than by man.”
I have read summaries of the article. I think this overstates the conclusions in the article quite a bit.
So we do not need ethanol in gasoline anymore? Sounds good to me.
It would be interesting to read the article itslef instead of this summary.
I put Kerry in the same category.
Perry sounds a lot more reasonable on this topic now, doesn’t he.
Temperatures can change twenty degrees in a normal day. It's the sun.
Here is a more detailed explanation:
CERN experiment confirms cosmic ray action
(The global warmists dam breaks)
You know what this means. National Journal of Science = Raciss
Yes Yes ,But Al scammer Gore looks at his bank balance and says , “They are wrong”...
You can be sure that the editors of Nature forced the authors to word the article to minimize the "damage" to the AGW meme. There has already been a lot of talk on climate skeptics blogs (Watts Up With That, DrRoySpencer.com) about that. IOW, the article was deliberately written to UNDERSTATE those conclusions.
Who’d a thunk it. A fusion fireball with a mass ~330,000 the mass of Earth would be the controlling factor in the Earth’s temperature.
There are two prestigious journals: Nature, and then, far behind, Science. Science has sold its soul to the AGW cartel. Was this paper published in Nature?
Despise Ya... mean it!
I had one of these, and every time the aplha/beta source inside my cloud chamber emitted a particle, it nucleated a vivid streak of cloud along its track.
Don't tell me those AGWeenies are going to try to argue that CERN's results are bogus!
He drove a steak through Gore’s heart.
...I know some scientists are questioning the peer review process on this paper,...
Aren’t you talking about the Dr. Roy Spencer article in Remote Sensing?
I think this is a different article.
I can’t even find the link to the original article anywhere. It doesn’t seem to be on the Nature website. Can anyone else find the article? Or even a link to the real abstract?
How about the title of the article?
To expect the Warmists to give up now is to engage in wishful thinking. Revelations of facts have never discouraged leftists. They will dig in their heels and call the Cern scientists incompetents or in league with evil Big Oil.
(Will open in new window)
(Will open in new window)
What is “Nature Journal of Science”? Is that the name of the journal? or is it just “Nature”, which is indeed the highest cited and highly reputed journal? I didnt find any citation in the article listed that would take me to the original article (supposedly) published in Nature.
Not saying it is wrong or anything, just it seems sleazy and backhanded to me...
I doubt it was published anywhere..
Here’s the article link:
Another interesting link:
Gee, if global warming were really so well demonstrated by science, would they need to persecute non-believers?
See my post #46
No, the article that the OP’s link talks about is by Professor Jyrki Kauppinen, or rather has him as one of the authors, while the article you provide link to doesn’t.
Been doing battle tonight with the Obots on Twitter. Man they have a lot of them on the Obozo payroll. Many say they are in Canada. Don’t believe it, but they are foreign, possibly from another planet.
They are up to their old trick. Again I saw some of them remove my posts. Made them vanish without a trace. I love the smell of Obot brains exploding.
This thing is going to blow. hee hee hee