(Will open in new window)
Posted on 09/06/2011 5:31:32 PM PDT by saganite
Nature Journal of Science, ranked as the world’s most cited scientific periodical, has just published the definitive study on Global Warming that proves the dominant controller of temperatures in the Earth’s atmosphere is due to galactic cosmic rays and the sun, rather than by man. One of the report’s authors, Professor Jyrki Kauppinen, summed up his conclusions regarding the potential for man-made Global Warming: “I think it is such a blatant falsification.”
The research was conducted by CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, which invented the World Wide Web, built the multi-billion dollar Large Hadron Collider, and now has constructed a pristinely clean stainless steel chamber that precisely recreates the Earth’s atmosphere. The climate study involved scientists representing 17 of Europe’s and America’s premiere research institutes. The results demonstrate that cosmic rays promote the formation of molecules that can grow and seed clouds in the Earth’s atmosphere; the temperatures then fall as the density of the clouds increase. Because the sun’s magnetic field controls how many cosmic rays reach Earth’s atmosphere; the sun determines the temperature on Earth.
Nature Journal has been the holy-grail of scientific research publication since it was established in England in 1869. Its original editors gave the title to their new scientific journal in celebration of a line by British poet William Wordsworth: “To the solid ground of nature trusts the Mind that builds for aye”. Because research scientists are the primary audience this most prestigious of journals, the magazine strives to retain its stamp of approval as the pinnacle of scientific credibility for original research. Nature first introduced its readers to X-rays, DNA double helix, wave nature of particles, pulsars, and more recently mapping of the human genome.
(Excerpt) Read more at biggovernment.com ...
(Will open in new window)
(Will open in new window)
What is “Nature Journal of Science”? Is that the name of the journal? or is it just “Nature”, which is indeed the highest cited and highly reputed journal? I didnt find any citation in the article listed that would take me to the original article (supposedly) published in Nature.
Not saying it is wrong or anything, just it seems sleazy and backhanded to me...
I doubt it was published anywhere..
Here’s the article link:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v476/n7361/full/nature10343.html
Another interesting link:
http://blogs.nature.com/news/2011/09/cool_climate_paper_sinks_journ.html
Gee, if global warming were really so well demonstrated by science, would they need to persecute non-believers?
See my post #46
No, the article that the OP’s link talks about is by Professor Jyrki Kauppinen, or rather has him as one of the authors, while the article you provide link to doesn’t.
TNX
Been doing battle tonight with the Obots on Twitter. Man they have a lot of them on the Obozo payroll. Many say they are in Canada. Don’t believe it, but they are foreign, possibly from another planet.
They are up to their old trick. Again I saw some of them remove my posts. Made them vanish without a trace. I love the smell of Obot brains exploding.
This thing is going to blow. hee hee hee
I second...
you might enjoy the humor of this:
What are Cosmic Rays?
http://www.scostep.ucar.edu/comics/books/cosmicrays_e.pdf
Heh, I remember the “global warming” scam.
Thank God that scheme got exposed before the United Nations was allowed to “redistribute” zillions of American energy-tax dollars around the globe forever, even as a handful of connected politicians here and abroad amassed “carbon trading” fortunes.
Whew! Those pigs came dangerously close to actually pulling it off!
What I thought he was talking about was this:
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/08/31/has-the-agw-argument-imploded/
And the reference I gave would have been pertinent to that.
But you are correct, the source he mentions is not one of the authors of the CERN article. I have no idea who Jyrki Kauppinen is or why Street quotes him. Street’s column is certainly botched work, not something anyone should hang their hat on.
No, I’m not talking about only one article; I’ve seen questioning about the peer review process for this Nature story in several sites.
This is not a legal case; there is no binding precedent in science.
btt
“I had one of these,”
I built a cloud chamber in the 9th grade. 1959. Plans were in Scientific Experimenter magazine. Got an A in Science Class.
I’ve only seen peer-review questioned in regards to the Remote Sensing article.
Could point me somewhere that talks about this in regards to the Nature article? Google didn’t come up with anything for me.
I will look, but my brain is full!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
