Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Ramsbotham
I suppose that's the price we pay for having vaccines. We sacrifice a small number of lives so that a large number of people might live. Now back to my Sir James Fraser.

It's probably worthwhile for contagious diseases spread by casual contact or by water or air, but a disease spread by sexual contact is different. Also the burden of the side effects is placed onto young people. The disease they want to prevent doesn't usually occur till the forties or fifties. Even then cervical cancer is highly treatable. Gardacil only protects against 4 strains of HPV, although Merck is testing its cross-strain efficacy against others. It's an expensive vaccine. The vaccine doesn't eliminate the need for regular pap smears due to the fact that it doesn't protect against all strains of HPV and future strains that may emerge. I was reading that a study didn't recommend it for mass vaccinations, because the cost of the vaccinations would be greater than the cost of treating the diseases it is supposed to prevent.

39 posted on 09/13/2011 8:31:17 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Paleo Conservative

Wait a minute! You’re not allowed to make sense on one of these Gardasil threads!!!


48 posted on 09/13/2011 8:34:12 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Happiness is a choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative

Are you in favor of removing hepatitis from the required vaccines?


50 posted on 09/13/2011 8:34:25 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative

[Gardacil only protects against 4 strains of HPV]

Gardasil provides immunity to 4 strains, 2 which are the high risk strains that causes 75% of all cervical cancers.


97 posted on 09/13/2011 8:52:47 AM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative

“I was reading that a study didn’t recommend it for mass vaccinations, because the cost of the vaccinations would be greater than the cost of treating the diseases it is supposed to prevent.”

This is the mentality of Obamacare. REALITY, is that a woman who gets this apparently safe vaccination, BEFORE she becomes sexually active, will avoid the most common provable cause of cervical cancer. Even if she waits till her wedding day to become active, there is nothing to argue against getting the vaccinations. Refusal to get this vaccine for a daughter, simply because it is a tacit admission that SOMEDAY, they will become a sexually active person is no better than a Jehovahs Witness refusing to get basic lifesaving treatments.

But i guess it makes better financial sense to wait till she gets cancer, then do a hysterectomy. Great for the collective,,kinda sucks for the INDIVIDUAL that our society is ordered around.
Refusing to recommend the vaccine because it’s cheaper to treat the women who get the cancer is PURE OBAMA. It’s *exactly* the same mentality of Obama saying “Maybe you should take the blue pain pill, instead of the expensive treatment.


267 posted on 09/13/2011 10:10:33 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson