Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palestinian ambassador reiterates call for a Jew-free Palestinian state
The Daily Caller ^ | 09/13/2011 | Jamie Weinstein

Posted on 09/13/2011 8:23:11 AM PDT by martosko

During a breakfast briefing hosted by the Christian Science Monitor on Tuesday, Palestinian Ambassador to the United States Maen Rashid Areikat reiterated his call to create a Jew-free Palestinian state.

“Well, I personally still believe that as a first step we need to be totally separated, and we can contemplate these issues in the future,” he said when asked by The Daily Caller if he could imagine a Jew being elected mayor of the Palestinian city of Ramallah in a future independent Palestinian state. “But after the experience of 44 years of military occupation and all the conflict and friction, I think it will be in the best interests of the two peoples to be separated first.”

Last year, Areikat made a similar statement during an interview with Tablet magazine. Asked whether it would be neccessary to transfer and remove “every Jew” from a future Palestinian state, Areikat responded “absolutely.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thedc.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ambassador; jews; maenrashidareikat; palestine; palestinianstatehood
Creative euphemisms. Is this d-bag channeling Borat now? I'm waiting for a chorus of "Throw the Jew down the well, so my people can be free."
1 posted on 09/13/2011 8:23:16 AM PDT by martosko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: martosko

“During a breakfast briefing hosted by the Christian Science Monitor”

The leftists have infiltrated a lot of mainstream Christian Churches.


2 posted on 09/13/2011 8:26:17 AM PDT by ZULU (ANYBODY but Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martosko

What would the world think if Israel decided to do this?


3 posted on 09/13/2011 8:31:21 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martosko

THEY ALREADY TRIED THAT IN EUROPE A FEW YEARS BACK........GOD WAS NOT HAPPY...........


4 posted on 09/13/2011 8:37:33 AM PDT by Red Badger ("Treason doth never prosper.... What's the reason? Why if it prosper, none dare call it treason.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The word was “Judenrein” and all they wanted was some “Leibenraum”.


5 posted on 09/13/2011 8:38:53 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The word was “Judenrein” and all they wanted was some “Leibenraum”.


6 posted on 09/13/2011 8:39:13 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: martosko
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

White House sources were unavailable for comment.

7 posted on 09/13/2011 8:44:28 AM PDT by newheart (When does policy become treason?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martosko
Why don't they just go live in the “Jew free states” that already exist?
Jordan
Iran
Iraq
Egypt
Syria
Lebanon
Kuwait
Saudi Arabia
Turkey
Lebanon
Libya
Pakistan
Afghanistan
Why do they have to have this tiny little spec also?
8 posted on 09/13/2011 9:11:00 AM PDT by BO Stinkss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
mainstream Christian Churches

The Church of Christs, Scientist is neither mainstream nor Christian.

9 posted on 09/13/2011 9:11:41 AM PDT by tbpiper (Sarah Palin is the antivenin for the Obama poison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: martosko

Historically, this was proposed some time ago in a more industrial fashion, by both the National Socialist’s Worker’s Party and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. It is no accident that the “Arab street” and the “Palestinians” supported this in the past and aligned themselves with National Socialists, and/or the USSR as long as it met this goal.

I would recommend all Freepers watch— for the elements of human nature (fictionalized history from the few records and testimony that exist)that most do not want to admit are possible. The techniques of manipulation are the same as in Cloward Piven and in communism/socialism- “Find the target, freeze it and eliminate it” You can see it in the day to day operation of the obamanation admin.

From “Conspiracy- Wansee Conference” (HBO):
“I have been asked to direct the release of Germany and all of Europe from the Jewish stranglehold , and I believe that together, we will. But, the brief remains clear: all of Europe, England, from Lapland to Libya, Vladivostok to Belfast—no Jews, not one.”
From pt.2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRtaoPr39WQ&feature=related
There are 10 minute segments viewable, Pt. 1 through Pt. 7.

The conference is well documented- it happened, and the mansion is still there on Wansee in Berlin. It wasn’t only Jews the pagans killed: gypsies, Catholics, Protestant underground, Lutherans... many more. Socialism’s ultimate method- the theft of property and rights, at the end of gun. Chilling. And this was 69 years ago, in 1942.

The attitudes and language here can be heard and observed in the current obamanation admin, particularly the obamacare systemic ordering of American lives. Obamacare must be destroyed, utterly. Or we will be.

The full version is available: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsn1x9ekEeE&feature=related

Deo Vindice.


10 posted on 09/13/2011 9:12:40 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper

Are those the ONLY Christian Churches involved in the Christian Science Monitor?

What are the Methodist Church, Episcopalian Church and Presbyterian Church stands on this subject? From what I can see THEY are infiltrated by leftists, at least at the higher ranks.


11 posted on 09/13/2011 9:20:56 AM PDT by ZULU (ANYBODY but Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

400K members of Christian Scientists worldwide. Not mainstream. Many more muslims, of course than most Christian denominations.


12 posted on 09/13/2011 9:21:43 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: martosko

You HAVE one!
It’s called Jordan!
Go HOME!


13 posted on 09/13/2011 9:30:07 AM PDT by G Larry (I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his character)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

United Council of Churches— totally infiltrated. And it started in the 50’s with the UN. World socialism continued under the aegis of the united nations of the world— a new world order.

Makes one think: “What was WWII fought over— it did not stop socialism?” Answer: it was fought for the purposes of progressivism, which was challenged by other powers, and eliminated an economic reality of the US depression while maintaining the power base of the socialist democrat machine of FDR and delaying the rise of a middle class conservative population in the US. A supportable opinion.


14 posted on 09/13/2011 9:31:05 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Well, the Jordanians don’t agree with this. Really, the Palestinians are treated, by the Arab powers as pawns in a game. And the Palestinians let them do it, because it pays them to do so— pays their political leaders anyway. What a situation.


15 posted on 09/13/2011 9:35:02 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: John S Mosby

What was WWII fought over?

My dad says that it was fought because Germany and Russia decided to split Poland - and the entire world went to war to make sure Russia got ALL of Poland.

All that aside....

If he can call for a Jew free Palestinian state, would it be acceptable for me to call for a Palestinian free Jewish state?


16 posted on 09/13/2011 9:43:13 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
Are those the ONLY Christian Churches involved in the Christian Science Monitor?

Its pricpallya news source that was founded by Mary Baker Eddy, also the founder of the Church of Christ, Scientist.

Of the three churches you mentioned, all have gone squishy on Islam, which is to be expected since they've all gone squishy on biblicaly authority.

Perhaps one of the saddest outcomes is that the Epicopalians are no longer capable of playing chess.

17 posted on 09/13/2011 10:02:24 AM PDT by tbpiper (Sarah Palin is the antivenin for the Obama poison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Your Dad has a point. Since the Russian revolution was financed by the Germans they had agents in place in Germany and nobody wanted the remaining Polish aristocracy or army in control of Poland. Though the Ribbentrop-Molotov deal had not yet been inked. WWII resulted from the Treaty of Versailles (you have the Germans at your feet or at your throat- and France found out which it had)

My thoughts are that after all that destruction we still have the progressive new world order socialists (now fully run by the clever stalinist spy network)running things with the UN and post WWII expansion of communism from behind the Iron Curtain right into Africa still today. And now, the obamanation and neo socialist obamacare.

My Dad, to his dying day said FDR willingly got the US into the war (thus solving the great depression for his continued reign and domestic control) and there is much evidence to support the collusion with Great Britain. His real world experience was war patrol in the Pacific that had “weapons free to fire” in October of 1941, against ANY Japanese shipping. He saved the orders.

Couple this with the now known British codebreaking, and thus advance knowledge of Jap fleet movements & targeting of Pearl Harbor- with the willful ignoring of this info by FDR et al in his admin— it was national policy and pure evil FDR.

Recommend highly: “In the Garden of the Beasts” Erik Larson— about Ambassador Dodd and family in Berlin up to 1933-1937. A good read, including the prevailing opinion of the elitist US State Dept, the German debt to US Bankers, and the human reality of the socialist agenda that was NOT stopped by WWII.
Deo Vindice

18 posted on 09/13/2011 10:37:15 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper
The Church of Christ s , Scientist is neither mainstream nor Christian.

Perhaps not mainstream, but definitely Christian.
19 posted on 09/13/2011 10:42:01 AM PDT by Jagermonster (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jagermonster
Perhaps not mainstream, but definitely Christian.

I beg to differ:

From Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures by Mary Baker Eddy P 333:3-15; p334:3

Jesus was not the Christ

From the New Testement

1 John 1:22 Who is the liar? It is the man who denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a man is the antichrist--he denies the Father and the Son.

Christian Science is purely a cult

20 posted on 09/13/2011 11:40:17 AM PDT by tbpiper (Sarah Palin is the antivenin for the Obama poison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jagermonster
Perhaps not mainstream, but definitely Christian.

I beg to differ:

From Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures by Mary Baker Eddy P 333:3-15; p334:3

Jesus was not the Christ

From the New Testement

1 John 1:22 Who is the liar? It is the man who denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a man is the antichrist--he denies the Father and the Son.

Christian Science is purely a cult

21 posted on 09/13/2011 11:40:17 AM PDT by tbpiper (Sarah Palin is the antivenin for the Obama poison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper
I've block excerpted the relavant pages of Science and Health below. There is no denial of the Christhood of Jesus therein. The citations you refer to comprise a discussion of the meaning of the term "Christ" applied to Jesus. Your paraphrase of 2 pages of discussion down to "Jesus was not the Christ," is simply incorrect. A much more accurate paraphrasing is that Christ is the job title that that Jesus, the son of God, filled.


332



            [    *    *    *    ]



9 IX. Jesus was born of Mary. Christ is the true idea
voicing good, the divine message from God to men speak-
ing to the human consciousness. The Christ
12 is incorporeal, spiritual,--yea, the divine
image and likeness, dispelling the illusions of the senses;
the Way, the Truth, and the Life, healing the sick and
15 casting out evils, destroying sin, disease, and death. As
Paul says: "There is one God, and one mediator between
God and men, the man Christ Jesus." The corporeal
18 man Jesus was human.
X. Jesus demonstrated Christ; he proved that Christ
is the divine idea of God--the Holy Ghost,
21 or Comforter, revealing the divine Principle,
Love, and leading into all truth.
XI. Jesus was the son of a virgin. He was appointed
24 to speak God's word and to appear to mortals in such
a form of humanity as they could understand
as well as perceive. Mary's conception of
27 him was spiritual, for only purity could reflect Truth
and Love, which were plainly incarnate in the good and
pure Christ Jesus. He expressed the highest type of
30 divinity, which a fleshly form could express in that age.
Into the real and ideal man the fleshly element cannot
enter. Thus it is that Christ illustrates the coincidence,


333


1 or spiritual agreement, between God and man in His
image.
3 XII. The word Christ is not properly a synonym for
Jesus, though it is commonly so used. Jesus was a human
name, which belonged to him in common with
6 other Hebrew boys and men, for it is identical
with the name Joshua, the renowned Hebrew leader. On
the other hand, Christ is not a name so much as the divine
9 title of Jesus. Christ expresses God's spiritual, eternal
nature. The name is synonymous with Messiah, and al-
ludes to the spirituality which is taught, illustrated, and
12 demonstrated in the life of which Christ Jesus was the
embodiment. The proper name of our Master in the
Greek was Jesus the Christ; but Christ Jesus better sig-
15 nifies the Godlike.
XIII. The advent of Jesus of Nazareth marked the
first century of the Christian era, but the Christ is
18 without beginning of years or end of days.
Throughout all generations both before and
after the Christian era, the Christ, as the spirit-
21 ual idea,--the reflection of God,--has come with some
measure of power and grace to all prepared to receive
Christ, Truth. Abraham, Jacob, Moses, and the prophets
24 caught glorious glimpses of the Messiah, or Christ, which
baptized these seers in the divine nature, the essence of
Love. The divine image, idea, or Christ was, is, and
27 ever will be inseparable from the divine Principle, God.
Jesus referred to this unity of his spiritual identity thus:
"Before Abraham was, I am;" "I and my Father are
30 one;" "My Father is greater than I." The one Spirit
includes all identities.
XIV. By these sayings Jesus meant, not that the hu-


334


1 man Jesus was or is eternal, but that the divine idea or
Christ was and is so and therefore antedated Abraham;
3 not that the corporeal Jesus was one with the
Father, but that the spiritual idea, Christ,
dwells forever in the bosom of the Father, God, from
6 which it illumines heaven and earth; not that the Father
is greater than Spirit, which is God, but greater, infinitely
greater, than the fleshly Jesus, whose earthly career was
9 brief.
XV. The invisible Christ was imperceptible to the
so-called personal senses, whereas Jesus appeared as a
12 bodily existence. This dual personality of the
unseen and the seen, the spiritual and mate-
rial, the eternal Christ and the corporeal Jesus manifest
15 in flesh, continued until the Master's ascension, when
the human, material concept, or Jesus, disappeared,
while the spiritual self, or Christ, continues to exist in
18 the eternal order of divine Science, taking away the sins
of the world, as the Christ has always done, even before
the human Jesus was incarnate to mortal eyes.

            [    *    *    *    ]


If it helps you, think about it by way of analogy - An explanation of all the reasons how George Washington was "The father of his country" does not equate to a denial the statement "George Washington is the father of his country."
22 posted on 09/13/2011 12:48:25 PM PDT by Jagermonster (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jagermonster
the Master's ascension, when the human, material concept, or Jesus, disappeared

This is not orthodox Christian doctrine. Jesus is still in His glorified body with the scars of the crucifixion. Everything you cited is the theological equivalent of psychobabble which is a consistent hallmark of a cult.

23 posted on 09/14/2011 5:59:31 AM PDT by tbpiper (Sarah Palin is the antivenin for the Obama poison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper
This is not orthodox Christian doctrine. Jesus is still in His glorified body with the scars of the crucifixion. Everything you cited is the theological equivalent of psychobabble which is a consistent hallmark of a cult.

Martin Luther was unorthodox, too. See, for example, Sola Fide. Disagreement between sects on points of faith does not negate the Christianity of one sect or another.

Consider also the unorthodoxy of Jesus' own teachings. For example, "Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you" (Matt 5:44) is a major departure from Mosaic law.

On it's face, this passage seems the sort of inane feel-good unreasonable tripe which would just invite more enemies, curses, despiteful use, and persecution. As you might say, psychobabble in light of common belief at the time; and yet, this is a core precept of Christianity. Is Christianity then a cult?
24 posted on 09/16/2011 7:55:50 AM PDT by Jagermonster (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jagermonster
Is Christianity then a cult?

Nice straw man.

Does Christian Science affirm* the fundamental truths expressed in both the Apostle's Creed and the Nicean Creed as do all orthodox Christians?

* This is without adding any qualifying explanations, i.e., it is a 'yes' or 'no' question.

25 posted on 09/16/2011 9:02:44 AM PDT by tbpiper (Sarah Palin is the antivenin for the Obama poison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson