Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Perry 'taken aback' by debate crowd reaction (on hypothetical case of young uninsured sick man)
MSNBC ^ | 09/13/2011 | Carrie Dann

Posted on 09/13/2011 1:53:07 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

TAMPA, FL -- The morning after a sometimes-rocky appearance in front of a Tea Party debate audience, Gov. Rick Perry said he was "taken aback" by cheers from some crowd members on a hypothetical question of whether a young man who decides not to buy health insurance should be refused care if he develops a life-threatening illness and be left to die.

"I was a bit taken aback by that myself," Perry told NBC News and the Miami Herald after appearing at a breakfast fundraiser in Tampa.

"We're the party of life. We ought to be coming up with ways to save lives."

Perry distinguished from that the issue of "justice," reiterating his strong support and "respect" for the death penalty on a state-by-state basis. "But the Republican party ought to be about life and protecting, particularly, innocent life," he added.

Perry also responded to the crowd's negative reaction to his support for allowing in-state tuition for illegal immigrants, saying his campaign has "the right message" on opportunities for children who were brought to the United States illegally "by no fault of their own."

"This issue is about education, it's not about immigration," he said.

"These kids showed up in our state by no fault of their own, some 2-3 years of age. And they've been in our schools, they've done their work, they've prepared themselves good, they want to be contributing members of society. So it would be I think the wrong message to say somehow or another that you can't go to our colleges, or we've going to punish you because of the sound of your last name."

"When people really think about it, I think they'll understand what we did in Texas was the right thing for Texas," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at firstread.msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: healthcare; healthinsurance; police; regulators; rickperry; socialists; teachers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-96 next last

1 posted on 09/13/2011 1:53:19 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

we REALLY have to control our people - if indeed they WERE “our people”.

ANYTHING like this, even a small number of audience participants will allow the Drive By Media to blast us - and our candidates and cause.


2 posted on 09/13/2011 1:55:36 PM PDT by ZULU (ANYBODY but Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I think more and more folks are getting sick and tired of being FORCED at the point of a government gun

to pay for the irresponsibility of others.


3 posted on 09/13/2011 1:55:56 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Nope to the first. Nope to the second. Two nopes is a double nope, also known as a dope.

Get it together, Perry. If you’re going to be our best or only chance not to end up with Romney as our candidate, you’re going to have to do MUCH beter than this!


4 posted on 09/13/2011 1:57:25 PM PDT by lonevoice (schizophrenic hostage taking hobbit terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“They’ve prepared themselves good”?


5 posted on 09/13/2011 1:57:54 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well this shows where the Perry haters stand on life.

I remember probably 10 years ago having a discussion with a Libertarian here at FR.

I asked him/her if they saw a person lying on the street:
1) Would you step over the person and walk on?
2)Would you call for help?

That person said step over and move on.

That attitude in the audience should make Floridians nervous, if O-Care get instituted. Between the Dummies and Libertarians Life doesn’t stand a chance.


6 posted on 09/13/2011 1:58:51 PM PDT by Marty62 (Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
or we've going to punish you because of the sound of your last name."

I am sympathetic to his argument, and yet it always bothers me when someone uses that phrase. We don't oppose illegals getting government services because we don't like the sound of their name, or the color of their skin, or their accent -- it's because they broke our laws.

I can sympathize with the children of illegals, because they didn't purposely break the laws. They were brought here without their own choice. And if they have been here for years, they may well be more tied to OUR culture than their nation of origin.

If we could solve ALL the other problems of illegal immigration, I wouldn't mind these few thousand kids being given student visas and green cards so they could go to college and then be productive members of society.

In texas, the total number of immigrants (legal AND illegal) who get in-state tuition appears to be around 11,000 or so. It's not a tidal wave. But so long as we have undefended borders and a government unwilling to send the people who DO choose to break our laws back home where they came from, it's hard to push for special treatment for the small number of children who are caught up in the mess.

7 posted on 09/13/2011 1:59:12 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Perry. Changing the way we spell “quisling”.


8 posted on 09/13/2011 1:59:52 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Freedom doesn’t only mean the freedom to make good choices. If someone chooses to be without insurance, they’ve made their choice.

If someone wants to ride a cycle without a helmet, who am I to stand in the way of their stupidity? And if an insurance company refuses to insure the helmetless rider, so be it. Personally I would insure them at a massive premium.


9 posted on 09/13/2011 2:00:43 PM PDT by cripplecreek (A vote for Amnesty is a vote for a Permenant Democrat majority. ..Choose well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Borders? We don't need no stinkin borders.

10 posted on 09/13/2011 2:02:35 PM PDT by McGruff (Why settle for second best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

RE: That person said step over and move on.

There are Christian Libertarians and Atheistic Libertarians. I would guess this person you talked to is the latter.


11 posted on 09/13/2011 2:02:35 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
""We're the party of life. We ought to be coming up with ways..."

goddamitNO~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"We" [The GOVERNMENT] should not do anything of the sort

Ron Paul was 100% CORRECT

People were not turned away from hospitals before government control- people took care of them other ways.

Now that government is involved people go to emergency rooms for every minor scratch.

the person in the audience who said "YES" was reacting to THE IDIOCY OF THE QUESTION.

12 posted on 09/13/2011 2:02:58 PM PDT by Mr. K (Palin/Bachman 2012- unbeatable ticket~!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I think the doctors and hospital should treat the patient if they choose, at their own expense, if they wish, or they should bill the person.

The govt. should not be involved in healthcare.


13 posted on 09/13/2011 2:05:14 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I can accept his viewpoint and in the general election these comments should help defuse the Obama hispanic vote.

But a HUGE however, I am really pissed he said “because some people dont like the sound of their last name”.

That has nothing to do with it and he should know better. Why play the race card on good Americans who hate illegal immigration?


14 posted on 09/13/2011 2:07:03 PM PDT by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I agree with Perry here. The question was BS, but I was a little surprised by the audience cheering for this answer. It is a serious matter and though Paul made sense on it and followed up with charities to help the needy and lowering medical costs, the cheering crowd on it looked bad and made we wonder if it was a cadre of Paulites getting excited. Poor taste overall.


15 posted on 09/13/2011 2:07:43 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

True, but that kind of reaction is NOT helping the Repub chances of winning in 2012.

The Dummies are already working on a tv ad.


16 posted on 09/13/2011 2:08:13 PM PDT by Marty62 (Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"This issue is about education, it's not about immigration," he said. That is the reason I do not like him.
17 posted on 09/13/2011 2:09:31 PM PDT by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Why play the race card on good Americans who hate illegal immigration?

Because it works to end discussion on an issue you know you can't defend.

18 posted on 09/13/2011 2:12:02 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The question was stupid, and designed to illicit a negative response that could be used against us.

It was an either/or false choice, and even Ron Paul knew better. We didn’t need government paying for health care to make people take care of sick people without insurance. We did it through charity.

Government became our charity in part because we WERE charitable, and moreso because politicians SAW that WE were charitable, and wanted to take CREDIT for that charity by giving our money away FOR us.

But seriously — this is the heart of the problem with our health care debate. Who among us would say that a person should be left to die on the sidewalk in front of a hospital, because they hadn’t bought insurance and didn’t have money to pay?

Sure, that’s the “Atlas Shrugged” answer, right? Take care of yourself, and if you don’t suffer the consequences? I believe that — until people are dying or I can help them. If somebody stupidly walks on the edge of a bridge, and falls over, I will jump in to save them, not let them drown because it was their own fault.

And I don’t want to leave people starving in the street, or dying on the sidewalk. But that means I can be taken advantage of, because people know we are charitable, and can take advantage of our charity.

I had a proposal once I thought had merit. We DON’T do Obamacare, or have government mandate health insurance. AND we treat everybody, no matter whether they have insurance or not.

But if someone gets treatment and can’t pay for it, then they are OURs. Not a slave, but they now OWE all the money we gave them. We can force them to buy health insurance at that point, because they OWE us for treating them. We can garnish their wages. Maybe we’d have a service program they could participate in. We make them pay for being stupid enough to not provide for their own security.

I’m not sure that would be incentive enough for people to do the right thing. Really, people who take advantage need to get “less-then-gold-plated” care. I don’t want to say substandard, but there has to be a difference in the service people who provide for themselves get vs people who make us pay for them.

Here’s a plan nobody here will support. We actually implement a national health insurance, paid for by taxes. But this is just a catastrophic plan, which provides limited services. No extraordinary life-saving care. No end-of-life amenities like hip replacements. It might even have death panels. Sorry, we have to ration to keep the prices low. Nobody WANTS to use this plan, but if you don’t provide for yourself, it will treat your heart attack, get you back on your feet and on your way.

The problem is we don’t have it in ourselves to be uncompassionate. I don’t think government is the solution for that, but I don’t know how to get us back to where we were compassionate on our own, and I fear the american people won’t stand for going back. They may hate Obamacare, but I believe they are quite happy with government providing a health care safety net.


19 posted on 09/13/2011 2:12:18 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
I am also sympatico to the plight of these kids dragged into a foreign land illegally. They are like kids without a country.

But Perry's use of the catchphrase "because of the sound of your last name" is itself extreme prejudiced and a form of vile namecalling against any who disagree with his position on the issue, because it tars all who disagree with the inferred epithet of anti-Hispanic racism.

And Mr. Perry amped up his utter disrespect for all who do not share his opinion by that "take that!" toothy assertive and aggressive grin he would end it with.

It ties in with his utter disregard for fellow Texan adults who are the parents of kids upon whom he forced the wart vaccine gardasil.

20 posted on 09/13/2011 2:12:50 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Speaking to the insurance issue here.

What is wrong with multi-tiered insurance? If you are in a restaurant, you can order the more expensive dish, or the cheaper, or opt out and go somewhere else for a sub. On insurance, if you pay, you should get better service than someone who doesn’t. Ultimately, that might mean triage for the deadbeats.

This solves a lot of the problems of freeloading. For example, take motorcycle helmets. I can see the safety argument for them, and the freedom argument against them. But, if you’re riding without a helmet, and without some insurance payment, with the assumption that the goverment (i.e., the rest of us) are happily guaranteeing the same level of brain care as for someone with a helmet and insurance, I think it’s freeloading.

A friend of mine told me that in Austria, they’re explicit about this, and there’s a two-tiered level of care. So, if you get cancer, but you don’t pay for private insurance, you might be told there’s an opening in six weeks at a clinic 500 miles away. But, if you were paying the additional private insurance, there would be an opening immediately at a nearby clinic.

This is where the Obama mandate goes wrong. (One of many ways). Instead of recognizing that there’s a benefit to wealth and payment, it pretends that in the interest of fairness and social justice no such benefit exists. Instead, it mandates a co-erced payment. Wouldn’t it be better to say “If you pay, we’ll do this for you, but if you don’t we’ll do the best we can. Not nothing, but not top of the line care, either.”

I was on a cruise boat a couple of years ago, and one of my tablemates was an ICU nurse. She was generally liberal and hated insurance companies because they tried to deny care to minimize expenses. But, then she said, “Do you know who gets the best medical care? Illegal aliens, because there’s no gatekeeper.” How she could be liberal while observing that is another story.

It would be much better to have a vague link between payment and care than the current system.


21 posted on 09/13/2011 2:13:13 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Let’s not fall for the subtext of these articles, which are suddenly ramping up. Notice the highlighting that this was a Tea Party debate. The subliminal message is that those crazy, far-right, cruel, vicious Tea Party people LAUGHED at somebody dying. See - look how crazy and dangerous the Tea Party is.

The mainstream media knows that a whole lot of Americans think that Obama is in over his head. They now are starting to lay the groundwork to slander those of us who believe in limited government (i.e., those with a Tea Party state of mind) in order to try to convince enough voters (to get to 270 electoral votes by hook or crook) that Obama is better than any alternative.

Obama can’t run on any record of accomplishment, so they are laying the groundwork NOW to try to make a belief in limited government somehow “beyond the pale” and get enough guilty white voters to vote for Obama again.


22 posted on 09/13/2011 2:14:00 PM PDT by rockvillem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

the answer about this hypothetical person is, we already have medicaid.


23 posted on 09/13/2011 2:15:54 PM PDT by tobyhill (A Democrat that doesn't lie would be a lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
McCain and Lindsey Graham also played the race card when anyone was against THEIR butt kissing illegal aliens.

Made Perry look REAL liberal when he said that.

24 posted on 09/13/2011 2:17:57 PM PDT by Happy Rain ("Count to ten when dealing with fools--with liberals make it twenty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
we REALLY have to control our people

What are you? A policeman?

You think we should wave our flags when he praises lower tuition for illegals?

25 posted on 09/13/2011 2:18:22 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Why play the race card on good Americans who hate illegal immigration?

So the WSJ will print their letters?

26 posted on 09/13/2011 2:19:43 PM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (My mind is like a steel trap: rusty and illegal in 37 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Marty62
There is a massive distinction between what government should do and what private individuals should do. The crowd was absolutely correct in that the government should not help the individual who made such a choice. What private individuals and charities should or should not do is an entirely different matter.
27 posted on 09/13/2011 2:23:44 PM PDT by Blackandproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I have to admit, and I will get flamed for this, but I am reconsidering my position on in-state tuition for children of illegals brought here at a young young age. Some of these kids speak English better that Spanish and many can’t read or write Spanish. Are we going to send literate English speakers to a country where they are illiterate? I know these cases are few, but maybe they should be reviewed. What I am against is then trapping us into citizenship for the Parents because you “can’t separate the family”. Baloney, my 20 year old goes to a school 500 miles from home... happens all the time.


28 posted on 09/13/2011 2:24:02 PM PDT by 11th Commandment (http://www.thirty-thousand.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What does “step over and move on” have to do with the person’s political or religious belief’s? I know plenty of people all across the political and religious spectrum that would help that person and I know a few who would not. In general those that would refuse to get personally involved have no problem saying the government should help them.

The difference I see is that while a libertarian may help that person (or not) he would never force someone else to help that person.

I have strong libertarian leanings (the principles not the party) and I would say that the state should not help that person even though I would.


29 posted on 09/13/2011 2:24:02 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice
Perry's hanging on to his illegals.

Guy is SICK!

30 posted on 09/13/2011 2:24:20 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; Marty62
BINGO!!

Atheistic Libertarians believes in less gov. because there is no such thing as "good". In the absence of "good" there is never any reason for one person to force another to do anything.
On the other hand, Christian Libertarians see that God created Natural Laws and Natural Justice to govern man. Any attempts of men to force other men to bend to the will of God are all made in vain. Men living by virtue, shunning vice and following the word of God will most of the time be rewarded here and always in heaven. That is Natural Justice. No government regulation can protect you as well as living a clean life can.

31 posted on 09/13/2011 2:24:54 PM PDT by nitzy (A just law does not punish virtue nor reward vice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I think the patient and his family should be responsible for making such a healthcare decision and they should be responsible for paying the bill when it’s all over. Once their resources have been exhausted, the taxpayers may be able to cover the shortfall but the patient and his family should be required to pay the taxpayers back with interest even if it means wage garnishment, tax refund forfeitures, etc. The healthcare system is a shiity mess. It got that way because the US government laid its hands on it. We shouldn’t entertain the notion that the system will get better if we let the government have even more contact with it.


32 posted on 09/13/2011 2:25:02 PM PDT by RC one (Voting isn't a simple act of civic duty anymore, it's a complex act of civil war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"...whether a young man who decides not to buy health insurance should be refused care if he develops a life-threatening illness and be left to die."

If he doesn't get a fat income directly or indirectly from government debt, like those bipartisan political folks who cheered, let him croak. That's the way of socialism shortly before it's corrected with a technocracy. Most currently politically active people are trying to shift more debt/inflation-generated government revenues from others to themselves.

Politics.


33 posted on 09/13/2011 2:25:16 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), Army NG, '89-' 96)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marty62
Between the Dummies and Libertarians Life doesn’t stand a chance.

Let me try to get the idea of what the "right to life" really means. I, too, am a libertarian conservative. At the core of any logical and reasoned based philosophy is that life is an a priori right. That means that MY life belongs to ME. Any arguments about that are between me and G_d. For earthly matters, it means I can do with MY life what I please as long as I perpetrate force nor fraud upon another (therin violating their right to life). To be clear this means that no person or government has the right to tell me how I should or should not act in any said situation. Forcing a person at the point of a gun (which is what government boils down to) to give up a portion of their life to do this or that is patently wrong. That means that my time and my money (a representation of my life) are mine to do with as I please. Anything outside of that is theft.

34 posted on 09/13/2011 2:25:19 PM PDT by numberonepal (Palin/Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
What are you? A policeman?

Hobbit control Ma'am. Kindly direct us to the offending hobbit and we'll get him under control.
35 posted on 09/13/2011 2:26:03 PM PDT by cripplecreek (A vote for Amnesty is a vote for a Permenant Democrat majority. ..Choose well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain
Yes, when Perry made the comment about the individual’s name I did not know whether it was Perry talking or Obama.

I have just about had enough of Perry. I will vote for him if he wins the nomination, but no way will I vote for him in a primary.

36 posted on 09/13/2011 2:26:16 PM PDT by Blackandproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I heard this repeated on Imus this morning. I don't know who Imus was speaking to but he reported on these "yahoos" in a hushed voice expressing shock and disbelief. Imus did his usual "ya, ya, ya."

Not buying it. I say they were plants. Perry's right. We're the party of life. We don't let innocents die. That's the other party.

37 posted on 09/13/2011 2:29:24 PM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Commandment

Hell yes they can go back to Mexico as English speaking only citizens. not one inch of ground will we cede to these invaders. Not one step backwards. This is war, there will be scorched earth and broken hearts.


38 posted on 09/13/2011 2:31:03 PM PDT by RC one (Voting isn't a simple act of civic duty anymore, it's a complex act of civil war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 11th Commandment

I fail to understand your point concerning in state tuition for illegals and sending English speaking children to Spanish speaking countries.

Is your belief that we should not deport the children? That is a different subject than in state tuition for illegals.


39 posted on 09/13/2011 2:34:30 PM PDT by Blackandproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Oratam

The man in the hypothetical question was not innocent. He made a deliberate and conscious choice. Are you saying he should not be responsible for his choice?


40 posted on 09/13/2011 2:37:48 PM PDT by Blackandproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Yep. Illegal means illegal. He also needs to stop with the pro life bit when he allows executions. I am for capital punishment, I just think he looks bad saying he is pro life and that is why he supported gardasil, yet he supports the death penalty. For me that is a minor irritant when compared to his pandering to the illegals. He made a big tadoo about the feds not helping with the border. I have a sinking feeling that he wouldn’t deport illegals even if the feds helped him to do it, that he would come up with some excuse not to deport them.

He isn’t getting my vote. He tried to make it about race instead of rule of law when he said it was because of their ‘last names’. He can stick it!


41 posted on 09/13/2011 2:41:36 PM PDT by Netizen (Path to citizenship = Scamnesty. If you give it away, more will come. Who's pilfering your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

There is a place for compassion but it is not via the force of government arms. Compassion belongs to individuals and their voluntary associations. There is no such thing as a compassionate government.

You would force all of the rest of us to support your compassion. How do you reconcile such a thing? You would cause the IRS to seize my personal property in order to help those you believe should be shown compassion.

There is nothing to stop you from spending ALL of your wealth to help someone. You even said you would risk your life so what is spending all you have compared to that? So go ahead and have at it but DO NOT force the rest of us to go along with it.

You mention if people do not pay they should get help but less than those who pay. I am curious where does your compassion end? After you have the government take our money to pay for getting the dying man off the street, will you also have us pay for his kidney transplant? You wouldn’t pay for it personally would you? Even though you would die helping him from getting run over buy a bus.


42 posted on 09/13/2011 2:42:53 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Blackandproud
Is your belief that we should not deport the children? That is a different subject than in state tuition for illegals

Good question, but let me ask you this, would the people against in-state tuition be happy if these kids were charge out of state tuition? If the answer is no, they want the families deported, then I would have a problem with deporting the young adult children. If the answer is YES, I would be happy if only the children paid out of state tuition. I could appreciate this position but this minuet difference of in-state vs. out of state tuition doesn't seem worthy of presidential debate.

So the real issue is, as you elluded too, are we going to give these children a path to citizenship. Here is where I am not so sure. My position was to deport but now I am not so sure.

43 posted on 09/13/2011 2:49:25 PM PDT by 11th Commandment (http://www.thirty-thousand.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Those were Ron Paul’s people. Did you see how many Paul signs were shown at the remote locations?


44 posted on 09/13/2011 2:52:15 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"But the Republican party ought to be about life and protecting, particularly, innocent life," he added.

Sorry mac, a man who is a hedonist, and thinks only of himself until he gets a terminal illness, is NOT an innocent life.

Goes double for perverts.

45 posted on 09/13/2011 2:52:19 PM PDT by Publius6961 (My world was lovely, until it was taken over by parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
If we could solve ALL the other problems of illegal immigration, I wouldn't mind these few thousand kids being given student visas and green cards so they could go to college and then be productive members of society.

This is the Dream Act, a rolling amnesty that would give up to 3 million legal status and eventual citizenship. And once they reach age 21 they can sponsor their siblings parents, cousins, uncles, aunts, etc. to enter the US thru chain migration, i.e., family reunification.

And where is the fairness to those "kids" who don't want to go to college? Shouldn't we be willing to help them so that they "can be productive members of our society?" We need electricians, carpenters, lawn maintenance personnel, etc. If you are going to be generous with other people's money, let's help them all.

46 posted on 09/13/2011 2:59:11 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
So it would be I think the wrong message to say somehow or another that you can't go to our colleges, or we've going to punish you because of the sound of your last name."

Playing the race card, albeit obliquely, is so lame.
I don't care what his last name sounds like, he is not entitled to the benefits of citizenship.

If he/she/it has caught the "American Spirit," he can dispense with the aztlan BS, diligently work to become a regularized immigrant, and then claim the rewards of citizenship.

Perry can run for office in Mexico,
No chance in hell that I would ever vote for him.

Public announcement : I will vote for a third party candidate or write-in candidate over Perry in a second. If that allows the great Bulls****er to win reelelection, I did not force it. Business-as-usual Republicans did.

47 posted on 09/13/2011 3:00:26 PM PDT by Publius6961 (My world was lovely, until it was taken over by parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

A rejoinder to Blitzer would be, “Who pays for the medical costs associated with the 12 to 20 million illegal aliens in this country?”


48 posted on 09/13/2011 3:01:50 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety

There are 60 million people on Medicaid, including the children in the CHIPS program. And there are 12 to 20 million illegals who use our ERs as free medical clinics. I guess Blitzer is more concerned about a few working American citizens getting on the socialist gravy train. We need more Americans paying so we can expand the freebies to others.


49 posted on 09/13/2011 3:06:02 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety

Easy solution, as I learned 30 years ago from one of the homeless town drunks. Every October he’d throw a brick through a jewelry store window and wait patiently until the police arrived to take him to jail. By spring he’d received better medical and dental than most Americans and he was out for the summer, all fixed up and rearing for six good months of Wild Irish Rose binges.


50 posted on 09/13/2011 3:07:13 PM PDT by GreyHoundSailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson