Skip to comments.NY-9: Stunning Repudiation of Chuck Schumer (Michael Barone)
Posted on 09/14/2011 6:33:40 PM PDT by neverdem
Republican Bob Turner has been declared the winner by the Associated Press in the New York 9th district special election. With 82% of precincts reporting, the latest returns show Turner with 53% of the vote and Democrat David Weprin with 46%. Weprin leads narrowly, 51%-48%, in Queens, where 90% of the precincts have reported; Turner leads 69%-31% in Brooklyn, where 66% of the precincts have reported. Thus if the remaining precincts in each borough match existing percentages there, Turner will win by a slightly larger margin than in current returns. This is a big reversal from the 2008 general election, when the 9th district voted 55%-44% for Barack Obama over John McCain.
This is a peculiarly shaped district, with the Brooklyn and Queens portions connected by little more than a strip of shoreline and several islands in Jamaica Bay. Many have written that the district has not been carried by a Republican since 1920. This needs a little qualification. The Brooklyn portion of the district is the descendant of districts held by Democrats Emanuel Celler (who won from 1922 to 1970), Elizabeth Holtzman (winner from 1972, when she upset Celler in the primary, to 1978), Charles Schumer (winner from 1980 to 1996) and Anthony Weiner (winner from 1998 to 2010). Cellers districts tended to run in a narrow corridor from Crown Heights and Brownsville, full of non-affluent Jewish immigrants from the 1910s to the early 1960s) down along Flatbush Boulevard and/or Ocean Parkway to Jamaica Bay. Now the district includes only part of that area. Essentially it includes heavily white (or Asian) neighborhoods deliberately excluded from the black-majority 10th and 11th districts.
To maintain the population standard, these mostly white portions of Brooklyn have been tied by redistricters to mostly white portions of Queens, including Forest Hills, the home base of Geraldine Ferraro when she was elected from 1978 to 1982, and neighborhoods running east to St. Johns University. These parts of Queens have, I believe, been parts of districts that have elected Republicans as recently as the 1960s (when liberal Republican Seymour Halpern represented much of Queens).
There are growing Orthodox Jewish neighborhoods in the district, especially in Brooklyn, and Turner seems to have carried Orthodox Jews by a wide margin over Weprin, who is an Orthodox Jew himself. Primary reason, it appears: to protest Barack Obamas policies and actions toward Israel. As others have pointed out, these relatively middle-scale (as opposed to upscale or downscale) Outer Borough Jews are not typical of affluent Jews in Manhattan or high-income suburbs, and so there is limited precedental value here for other districts.
Nevertheless, it is also notable that Weprin ran no better than even among other voters in the district. For nearly two decades it has been taken for granted that white residents or metro New York are heavily Democratic. Not so the white residents of the 9th congressional district today. They just issued what amounts to an emphatic thumbs down on the policies of the Obama Democrats.
This result is a rebuke to Barack Obama, but it is a rebuke as wella stinging one, perhaps more stingingto Senator Charles Schumer. He represented much of this district for 18 years. The now-disgraced Anthony Weiner was his staffer and pretty obviously Schumers chosen successor as congressman when he ran successfully for the Senate in 1998. In addition, Schumer has made it his special project to win back white middle class voters in places like metro New York for the Democratic Party.
In January 2007, just in time for the new Democratic majority in Congress, he published a book, Positively American: Winning Back the Middle-Class Majority One Family at a Time. It is a thoughtful essay on how Democrats can win the votes of the kind of voter Schumer himself has won over in his career as a congressman and senator, with specific policy recommendations as well as public relations advice. As one of the three Democratic leaders of the Democratic majority in the Senateand by common reckoning the one who outshines in intellect the other two put togetherSchumer has played an important role in fashioning Democratic policies, including but not limited to the 2009 stimulus package and Obamacare.
This vote is a startling repudiation of those policies by just the voters Schumer was hoping to win over. I write this without any rancor for Chuck Schumer. I admire his intellect, I admire his capacity for hard work and while I think he often acts to gain partisan advantage I think it must also be said that he tries to achieve good public policy results. He has risen from a modest background (he is a graduate of James Madison High School in Brooklyn, the alma mater also of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and former Senator Norm Coleman: a pretty impressive record for a non-selective high school serving a non-affluent neighborhood) and has not gotten where he is because of personal wealth (he has none) or overpowering personal charm.
Schumer will surely continue to serve as senator as long as he wants (since direct election of senators came in, no incumbent Democratic senator from New York has been defeated for reelection). But his project of forging a Democratic governing majority based on successful public policies took a severe beating in this special election.
Schumer went hunting with Dick Cheney?
Schumer: you exist as a senator ONLY becaue we allow it. You seem to act like you are entitled to your seat....you’re not.
Could the Jews finally be waking up?
UP CHUCK IS DOING JUST THAT, WAIT UNTIL 2012
Naw,Cheney would aim a bit higher.
“[Schumer] has not gotten where he is because of ... overpowering personal charm.”
If Barone was drinking anything when he typed that sentence, his keyboard is ruined.
“To maintain the population standard, these mostly white portions of Brooklyn have been tied by redistricters to mostly white portions of Queens, including Forest Hills, the home base of Geraldine Ferraro when she was elected from 1978 to 1982, and neighborhoods running east to St. Johns University. These parts of Queens have, I believe, been parts of districts that have elected Republicans as recently as the 1960s (when liberal Republican Seymour Halpern represented much of Queens).”
until someone gives them a nice big dose of white guilt..
I’ve seen numerous references to Geraldine Ferraro representing this district... but she NEVER did (unless it was for an insignificant sliver, for which I haven’t been able to confirm). They’ve been looking at Wikipedia for Dist. 9 and reporting it as such, but the lines and district numbers were changed for 1992 and 2002...
“Weprin leads narrowly, 51%-48%, in Queens, where 90% of the precincts have reported”
obviously I would have liked Turner to win Queens since I live there. But we did our job. Kept it close to 50% and let Brooklyn do their part.
I will say this very carefully and deliberately.
I am Jewish, although not religious.
If people mistakenly see Chuck Schumer as representative of what Jews are all about, then while it does not justify or excuse anti-Semitism, it certainly would help to explain some of it, even though it is misdirected.
Schumer is a despicable human being. Period. That has nothing to do with his religion or ethnicity, but everything to do with the rottenness that infects and infests his very soul. He has built his entire career based on telling disgusting lies and burying the truth, while thuggishly working to undermine human liberty and justice. In the Democratic Party, human filth rises to the top. No wonder Schumer is one of their leaders.
I saw several reports earlier today... stating the same thing. Nice tag!
Sir, you speak the truth.
Thanks. Last week I wrote up the history of this district from the 1910s onward...
So.. how is going to be the anti-Negro?
Last night there were 37 precincts from Queens and 37 precincts from Brooklyn that had not yet reported. I suspect it is a game of chicken, because the dimTurd RATs in Queens are waiting for Brooklyn to report, so that the dimTurd Queens demoRATs will know how many votes they need to dredge up & fabricate in order to STILL pull this election out. The fact that everyone will know it is a stolen election does not bother demoRAT bastards in the least. What is the hold-up? Last night there were 82% of the precincts reporting..... now 24 hours later it is still 82%. What is the hold-up? Any from NY-9 have any insight on this?
So.. Who is going to be the anti-Negro?
So.. Who is going to be the anti-Negro?
Usually Barone is pretty good, but anyone who could admire Schmucky Shumer for his “intellect” is sadly deluded (IMHO). Guy is nothing more than a rabid attack dog, which needs to be put out of its misery.
Worth repeating...and your post is ROFLMAO funny, 60's child. Thanks.
outshines in “intellect”....
stimulus package and Obamacare
What am I missing????
This isn’t someone who saw “NY-09” on Wikipedia; this is Michael Barone. Seems odd for the author of the Almanac of American Politics to make such a mistake. He specifically mentioned Forest Hills as her base, and he provided the whole laundry list of representatives from the Brooklyn portion of the current NY-09 starting with Cellar, so he gave this some thought. Could Ferraro’s NY-09 have included Forest Hills in 1978 and 1980?
I located an Almanac from 1980 (with the ‘72-’82 lines) which did have a map of her 9th area and tried to overlap it with a current map. According to it, it does appear that a small area overlaps in the Queens neck and part of the western edge above that (again in the Queens part). I was using a much smaller map from the Cong. Atlas to try to ascertain where the lines fell in my post from last week. I’d still maintain, however, this is not the seat she’d have run in today, but the districts have been so augmented and enlarged over the years (and, of course, one need not even reside in the district to win, as Weprin didn’t even live there, which I think was a big mark against him).
“We’re going to hammer guns on the anvil of relentless legislative strategy! We’re going to beat guns into submission!”
~Senator Charles Schumer, 1993
I’m surprised that the Examiner changed this title to NY-9. That’s why search didn’t catch it. Yours was New York 9. I was thinking maybe National Review’s version.
The NY Times had a story years ago that he maxxed the SAT.
This tectonic shift has yet to happen, but I will thank G_d if it does. Donkey socialists/Marxists are primal threats to the United States and to Israel.
You would hope. But NY Jews are idiots and fools.
I womder how hard it was for him to eat those words? There must have been a lot of cognitive dissonance. He was the head of the DSCC in 2006 recruiting candidates that were gun owners pledging fealty to the Second Amendment.
I am an “Upstater” and long time observant of Shumer’s demeanor. I couldn’t agree with you more. I hope the voters put him out to pasture. It is time.
Bookmarked for a later read... thanks!
Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.
I love it.
The left is imploding.
Thanks for the ping!