Posted on 09/15/2011 5:29:15 AM PDT by bayouranger
The Palestine Liberation Organization's ambassador to the United States said Tuesday that any future Palestinian state it seeks with help from the United Nations and the United States should be free of Jews.
"After the experience of the last 44 years of military occupation and all the conflict and friction, I think it would be in the best interest of the two people to be separated," Maen Areikat, the PLO ambassador, said during a meeting with reporters sponsored by The Christian Science Monitor. He was responding to a question about the rights of minorities in a Palestine of the future.
Such a state would be the first to officially prohibit Jews or any other faith since Nazi Germany, which sought a country that was judenrein, or cleansed of Jews, said Elliott Abrams, a former U.S. National Security Council official.
Was he misquoted? Could he have really said "Israelis" or "Zionists"? Nope. Areikat was interviewed in Tablet last year and said this explicitly:
So, you think it would be necessary to first transfer and remove every Jew—
Absolutely. No, I’m not saying to transfer every Jew, I’m saying transfer Jews who, after an agreement with Israel, fall under the jurisdiction of a Palestinian state.
Any Jew who is inside the borders of Palestine will have to leave?
Absolutely. I think this is a very necessary step, before we can allow the two states to somehow develop their separate national identities, and then maybe open up the doors for all kinds of cultural, social, political, economic exchanges, that freedom of movement of both citizens of Israelis and Palestinians from one area to another. You know you have to think of the day after.
About two thirds of the nations of the world represented in the United Nations supports the establishment of a state that is, by definition, anti-semitic.
It would not just an "apartheid" state - it would be a state whose very basis would be the ethnic cleansing of every single Jewish man, woman and child.
We should be hearing the outraged condemnations from human rights groups any minute now. Of course.
Liberals will see this as a pragmatic solution. It could end the conflict for good. Sort of a Final Solution, if you will. The Left loves that stuff.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
“After the experience of the last 44 years of military occupation and all the conflict and friction, I think it would be in the best interest of the two people to be separated,” Maen Areikat, the PLO ambassador, said*******
OK, by this line of reasoning I assume this means that right of return is off the table wrt millions of Arabs flooding into a downsized Israel. And what about those Arabs presently living in Israel, they must be expelled as well?
I’ll bet Mr. Areikat has a different view of that issue.
Indeed, ethnic cleansing apartheid, is really exclusively on the Arab/Muslim side.
Mark
The insanity of this whole thing is that the UN is ready to go for it.
These people are not ready to assume a State.
Guess who’s supposed to pay for the new Palestine from nuts to bolts, education forever, infrastructure, army...including a standing US force to protect it from Israel forever. Guess.
Mark
We’ll know on the 22nd when all the koranimal nations, with Russia, vote for their statehood at the UN, right?
So, does this mean Israel can be Palestinian-free and Muslim-free and therefore all Muslims will leave?
Voting to give Palestine a State is like voting to give them a license to destroy Israel.
Of course they will try. If the UN wants to bring about a war, I cannot think of a better way.
Whay are we supporting the UN with US borrowed dollars anyway?
NO, for the Palestinians to kick every last Jew out, is merely the expression of an “Oppressed people striving to seek and find their own national identity.” Thus sayeth the left.
For Israel to act in the same way by expelling its Arab populations would be “an act of extreme prejudice, hatred, bigotry, nastiness and just plain being not a nice thing to do.”
The modern definition of an “HEINOUS ACT” totally depends on who commits it. Obscene, but factual.
If Israel even mentioned kicking out muzzies the whole muzzie world and UN would be condeming them and planning war. (While continuing to launch rockets into Israel and demanding more water, electricity, and medical aid from Israel. Murderous hypocrits.)
Makes me believe in G!D that much more. This is so bass -ackward but these are the last days. My daughter is caled up, or will be called up by shabbot as a reserve. I am so danged angry at the world community to allow this fiasco, this coming wanna be second holocaust if the haters can do it but darned near every COUNTRY is anti-Israel due to the propaganda GRRRRR!
I would gladly take her place if they let me.
My prayers are with you & yours.
Oh, how wonderful! It’ll be just like the Rhine? Oh, that’s not what it means? Oh. Those Haaretz reporters lied to me.
Sure. Just like in Ghaza. Once they moved all those Jooos! out, the Arabs became nice and pieceful.
Abrams is wrong, anyway. Jordan prohibits Jews, and so does Saudi Arabia. That’s the real issue behind the “settlements”. They are on land from which Jooos! were forcibly removed in ‘48.
´Hotsi-totsi, another Nazi.¨
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.